Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Getting rid of my default. Have I got a case?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a HFC (Marbles) Credit Card. I didn't exceed my credit limit until banks started charging me.

 

However I also didn't pay anything for a few months due to being out of work. I did communicate this with them but they didn't offer me any help or advice. They just sold the debt to Westcott Credit Services. I eventually found work and started paying £20 per month over the phone with Westcott until I was in a position to settle the amount in full (when they offered me a settlement figure).

 

I am in the process of claiming the charges back. However can I get rid of the default too?

 

:-|

Data Protection Act Letter

Sent 30th June 2006 - waiting for response..... :shock: Received 01 August but incomplete!!! :rolleyes:

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance letter

Sent 30 August 2006 - 7 days to respond.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will only be able to attempt to get rid of the default if it was mainly due to charges - it doesn't sound like the case here though, as you were probably defaulted for not making payments. However, you can still claim back the payments - see the FAQs for more guidance. :)

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've looked through the FAQs and what I can gather is that if the amount owed was mostly charges I would have a case. However I did call the bank on numerous occasions to say that I was out of work. I said that I could afford to pay £20 per month but they didn't explain anything about defaults. If I'd have paid a token amount I would have been in a better situation. But the impression they gave me was that I had to pay the amount on the statement and that was all they could take. They hassled me over and over about payments. I ended up on anti depressants. I couldnt pay them any more than what I'd said. Eventually I ignored them because I couldnt take their hassle anymore. A little while later I started getting letters from the debt collection agency. I never received a default letter. As soon as I was swapped over to the debt collection agency I started to pay £20 per month immediately until I settled on a settlement figure as they explained that I just needed to offer something.

Data Protection Act Letter

Sent 30th June 2006 - waiting for response..... :shock: Received 01 August but incomplete!!! :rolleyes:

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance letter

Sent 30 August 2006 - 7 days to respond.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice :)

Data Protection Act Letter

Sent 30th June 2006 - waiting for response..... :shock: Received 01 August but incomplete!!! :rolleyes:

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance letter

Sent 30 August 2006 - 7 days to respond.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

There may be a case if you weren't notified of the default, and especially if it was mainly down to charges. It would have been better at the time (isn't hindsight wonderful! ;)) to have put the balance in dispute and pay a token amount but there's not much you can do about that now...

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent off my data protection letter. Will that show whether I'd received a default letter or is it my word against theirs?

 

And yes hindsight is great! I wish this site had been around when all my troubles started. I just used to believe that these people are honest and trustworthy and it was all my fault. How wrong could I have been! Also when you're young and naive taking on the banks is a scary thing to do. I suppose that's what they want though! And that's why they make these procedures so hard and drawn out.

 

:rolleyes:

Data Protection Act Letter

Sent 30th June 2006 - waiting for response..... :shock: Received 01 August but incomplete!!! :rolleyes:

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance letter

Sent 30 August 2006 - 7 days to respond.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...