Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair? Illegal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Are you sitting comfortably? Then I'll begin.

Once upon a time I was working for a flooring company after 2 years I left but then returned a month later after things didn't work out with another company. I then worked a further 20 months up until Jan 2008.

In October 2006 the company moved to bigger premises and I was asked to decorate the old and the new premises I agreed as I used to be a decorator in a former life. As time was tight and my partner was not working I asked would it be ok if she helped. No problem said the boss. Over the next couple of weeks the boss got to know my partner and offered her a full time position training on a 3 month trial basis. She would be paid £30 per day but the money would be paid on my wages as a bonus. Our working day was 9.5 hours.

We were grateful for the opportunity and she accepted.

 

Everything was going well, the boss was happy, there was even a magazine article about her being the first female fitter for the company.

We were working mainly on fairly large construction sites around west London so my partner was sent to take the HSE CSCS test also on a 3 day fitting course. Things were looking good........3 months passed......6 months passed......9 months passed.......September 2007 finally she was taken on the cards at the rate of £50 per day ....and they all lived happily ever after?...........not quite.

 

Had a great christmas. Returned to work on 3rd Jan 2008. On 7th Jan had a phone call at work and was told to go to the office at 5.30 for a "chat".

We met with the boss and the contracts manager and were told that we were being made redundant with 1 months notice from that date because the company could not afford to employ us as direct labour but they had plenty of work so we could buy our company van and work for them on a subcontract basis.This offer was an empty one as the contracts manager(also a director) had made it clear in the past that we didn't fit in so we knew work would not be offered to us. We left the office stunned.

 

Next day we went to site feeling pretty miserable when 2 other fitters turned up saying they had been sent to finish our work. We gave up and went home. The company did not contact us until 10th Jan when we were told we were in breach of contract and would not get our months pay.

 

We have since written to the company informing them we believe the way we were treated was unfair and they had paid less than minimum wage to my partner for over 10 months.

The reply we received was a denial it was unfair also they deny my partner worked for them until September 2007 although they did say "Prior to your full time employment in September 2007 the company did offer you experience on a part time basis" .

Sorry but I drove the van and I was contracted to work 9.5 hrs on site every day with 2 to 3 hrs travelling on top, her "experience" was never part time. The reply also contains blatent lies that we are hardly in a position to refute.

 

We feel we are dealing with some kind of monster who's word is law.

Any help we could get on which route to take next would be much appreciated. Thanks all.

 

THE END

 

Ps next novel War and peace 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does sound like Unfair Dismissal since there were no real grounds for dismissal. There was work to be done, you were doing your work, and they sent someone else to finish your work so money was not a problem for them.

 

It does seem a bit tricky with your partber being paid as a "bonus" on your wages however, if it can be substantiated that she was working from a certain time, be it witnesses, security footage etc then you should have a case for a claim there.

 

I suggest you contact a solicitor. You may have to provide more information regarding the working conditions and your employment contract but on the face of what you have said above, you do have a case for a claim for Unfair Dismissal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry to hear of your troubles. You could use the magazine article stating she was the first female fitter as evidance she was working for them.

 

The difficulty I believe you may have is you simply gave up and walked out. Did you not speak to anyone in the company during this time?

 

If you walk away from your job you are not fulfilling your contract and the company could argue you had left. Does the letter say you have been dismissed, if so you need to lodge an appeal against their decision. You will need to have shown to any tribunal that you made every effort to resolve this with the employer before proceeding to tribunal although you should still submit within the time limits even if you are still seeking remedy.

 

All the best,

 

Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, nice to have people out there.

 

dundeelaw

The company were employing sub-contractors on a full time basis when we were made redundant and they still are to this date.

We have managed to contact the company secretary who left Dec 2007 who delt with timesheets and pay. We had a very interesting chat.

 

Paul

I left messages but had no reply. I spoke to another employee on 9th Jan who had been told we had left the company. He knew nothing about redundancies. Humiliation and anger took over.

Any correspondance we have with the company now is by letter. We were told we were in breach of contract from 9th Jan and would not receive any pay or benifits from that date. We were made redundant.

 

Update- I have found out that my partner, when she was taken on the cards was getting paid £5.26 ph (minimum wage £5.52)

 

They did not follow the 3 step procedure.

 

We have an appointment with CAB tomorrow to complete the Tribunal forms still a long way to go but they were wrong.

 

Thanks again for your interest we will keep you informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks for the offer dcdkpug but we can't afford a solicitor at the mo. We are still waiting for a response from them until 30/4.

 

We now have witness statements and site evidence (daily signing in register from building contractors)

 

Question for anybody. If an offer is made what should we be looking for?

 

Thanks to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...