Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

midge61 v argos card ***WON***


midge61
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

 

I sent off my s.a.r and recieved my info. Got my application form and lots of printouts.

 

After reading other threads i did my spreadsheet asking for everything that came under the heading "other debits", totalling just over £600.

 

I sent my pre lim and today recieved a reply. They claim I can only claim back late payment fees and that according to their calculations they amount to £247 (they sent another printout for this) and have offered £80 as gesture of goodwill.

 

Does anyone know whether I have to accept their calcs for £247 or do I continue for the £600?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi midge

 

The answer to your question is "it depends". I like the idea that they say you can only claim back late payment fees - makes it sound like they agree with us :D. On a credit card or store card you can claim back late payment fees and and fees for exceeding your credit limit. Anything else under 'oter debits' you probably can't reclaim.

Does anyone know whether I have to accept their calcs for £247 or do I continue for the £600?
You don't have to do anything they say at all - its your claim. Check the charges along the lines of what I wriote above and claim that. It might be that £247 is all you can claim if the only unlawful charges are late payment charges. Do the maths and tell us what you find.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for reply. The trouble is the printouts that came with the sar don't state what the other debits are.

 

There is a column for outstanding balance, interest charged and then other debits.

 

Nowhere does it state late payment fee or over the limit fee and as they have not sent actual copies of my statements I can not check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way forward then is to go for the whole £600 and, if it comes to court (which it won't) you can request full disclosure including what each charge actually is for. Send the LBA for the full £600. If you want, you could answer their letter and say that, as they don't distinguish between the 'other debits' you are going to assume they are all unlawful penalties until they prove otherwise. You can amend you claim at any time until you issue in court. (After that, you can still amend the claim but it costs money).

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Reply recieved today. It contains some gobbledygook about cheques not being honoured and the amount being added back to the account.

 

This I can understand but it still doesn't explain why such large amounts in the other db section because the balance is in a seperate column.

 

they have upped their offer to £120 though...........still short of the £600 so no deal.

 

Does anyone one have a POC template for store cards?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one for credit cards would be fine. What I am planning on doing should it get to court (and Argos are still playing their faces) is invite the judge to look at the figures and decide what should be refunded (along with the interest) as this makes it more flexible INMO. Just a suggestion.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I Argos another letter stating that I have tried to make their figures tally but have been unable to so will continue to claim £600 plus their interest rate of 27.9% make a total of 1k.

 

Didn't get a reply so filed my claim on 29/5/2008.

 

today I got a letter from them again stating that £262 of the amount claimed is from a bounced cheque being re added to the account.

 

I have sent them another letter stating that they did not send any statements in reply to my S.A.R and that I have had to go on their appaling printouts. Have also stated that the copy of the application form they sent me does not contain prescribed terms and claim has now been filed so I will take my chances. Have also offered to settle for £700 so will see what happens now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Teir letter also said if i procede down the court route they will apply to have the claim struck out because it is inaccurate.

 

Well if they don't supply the correct info that's their fault as far as I can see.

 

Will sit and twiddle my thumbs for a bit. Good luck with yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have been trying to contact the court as I have not heard anything and cheque not cashed.

I will have to re-do it over the weekend and take it in myself on Wed when I'm off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i am just re doing my claim for court and confusing myself (which doesn't take much lol).

 

I have decided to adjust the amount and take off the amount that they say was for a bounced cheque.

 

How do i calculate the court cost..........is it on the sum of charges + interest + the 8% interest or is it just charges + interest?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say 'bounced cheque' is that a chareg for bouncing a cheque - if it is, you should claim it back.

 

yes, it's charges + interest on the charges + 8%

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you changed your mind about contractual then or are you going to put 8% as an alternative. Have a look at Steven's goldfish thread which you can find below his posting. I ended up with everything I went for despite their playing their faces. All the best.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've used stevens poc posted for animal-lover and claimed contractual and the 8% I just took off an amount that was for a bounced cheque.

 

It all adds up to just over the amount I offered to settle for in my last offer.

 

Hopefully it will come through in time for my son's 18th in Sept.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Phoned the court this morning. I had my dates all wrong. They had until 21/7/2008 to reply and court have not recieved anything so I have sent off a request for judgement today.

 

So will still have to wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...