Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wrong data on experian, how can I get it removed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, hope that someone can help. I originally applied for credit for £500, when I was refused I thought that it was just my bad luck with the credit crunch and all.

 

I went for a mortgage and was also refused so I applied for my credit report and instead of £500 that I had previously asked for the finance company had applied for £45,000. I have asked the finance company to remove the amount from my credit file but up until now they haven't done this.

I am at present sending them another letter this time by recorded delivery and giving them 7 days to comply with my request, if this doesn't work can anyone else advise me what to do.

I am also sending experian all the paperwork from the finance company to let them see that I only requested £500 not £45,000, and see what they're reply is.

Is there anything in the DPA that I can use to get this amount of my credit report, and can I threaten the finance company with court proceedings because of their negligence I am finding it difficult to get a mortgage.

Hope someone can help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incorrect information

There are three steps you can take if you have incorrect information on your file:

 

1. Write to the agency asking them either to remove or change any entry which you think is wrong. Explain why you think the information is wrong and send any evidence you have which proves the information is incorrect. The agency has to tell you within 28 days of receiving your letter if the information has been corrected, removed or if they have done nothing. If the information has been corrected, you will get a copy of the new entry.

 

2. If the agency does not reply, or tells you they have done nothing or makes a correction which you do not think is satisfactory, you can, within 28 days, send them a ‘notice of correction’ to be added to your file. A notice of correction is a statement of up to 200 words written by you. It should explain clearly why you think the information is wrong or misleading.

 

3. If the agency does not reply to your letter enclosing your notice of correction within 28 days of receiving it, or the agency has refused to add it to your file, you can appeal to the commissioner.

 

When you write to the commissioner include the following details:

  • Say you are writing under section 159(5) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Give your full first names and surname and address
  • Give the name and address of the agency
  • Give details of the disputed entry in the file. Say why you think it is wrong, and why you think you are likely to suffer because it is wrong. It will help if you enclose any evidence you have which shows that the information is incorrect
  • Give the dates you sent the notice of correction to the agency; if you cannot remember, give an approximate date
  • It will help if you enclose any correspondence between you and the agency, as well as a copy of your notice of correction.

The commissioner may ask the agency for their side of the story, as well as sending them a copy of your letter. In return you will be sent the agency’s reply.

 

When the commissioner has considered your application he will decide how the matter should be resolved.

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...