Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A & L Trying Court second time


bach
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all especially PriorytyOne who has given so much help, I thought I would start a thread of my own now.

 

Basically got into trouble with A&L they put it in the hands of Global (Priorty helped sort that one out) sent the CCA.

In between waiting for CCA , I was issued with Judgement etc and now at the stage with Shoosmiths Solicitors. Northampton Count Court have sent a Variation Order to the wrong court, 100's miles away requesting payment in full by 30th March, received the actual Order on the 3oth March. Got homeThursday evening to find letter from Alliance & Leicester in response to my request for CCA saying

 

"with regret they were not able to acknowledge or replie to this as it was because they were unable to supply a copy of the agreement."

 

"In respect of legal action I have requested that the current action be discontinued."

 

Do I now contact them, to continue making a token payment,

Eventually it will probably will go back to the Court as they are trying to make a Charge on the Propery, and it would perhaps look as if I am trying to pay a bit. Or leave it a lone and wait and seen next move from them.

 

Oh yes, and should I speake to the Court to double check that it has been discontinued.

 

All advise greatly appreciated

 

Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 274
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bach, I am so pleased for you :D .... the letter is fantastic news, but I am unclear as to whether it means that they are also not going to enforce the CCJ...

 

They're not going to risk court action for a property charge now though.... probably becaue the date that the CCA was received would come out in court. You need to look into getting that CCJ set aside now, if possible.

 

:)

 

After reading it again... I am inclined to think that they will not enforce the CCJ either. Any thoughts from anyone else ?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bach, I am so pleased for you :D .... the letter is fantastic news, but I am unclear as to whether it means that they are also not going to enforce the CCJ...

 

They're not going to risk court action for a property charge now though.... probably becaue the date that the CCA was received would come out in court. You need to look into getting that CCJ set aside now, if possible.

 

:)

 

After reading it again... I am inclined to think that they will not enforce the CCJ either. Any thoughts from anyone else ?

 

How can they enforce a CCJ given that there is no CC Agreement?

 

Wondering how they got a CCJ in the 1st place given no agreement???

 

Maybe a Judgement here that needs setting aside...?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can they enforce a CCJ given that there is no CC Agreement?

 

Wondering how they got a CCJ in the 1st place given no agreement???

 

Maybe a Judgement here that needs setting aside...?

 

 

 

 

Court papers were issued before the CCA request was sent off.... so a CCJ was obtained without being challenged in court (by default). As it stands, a CCJ overrides a CCA request... and payments have to be made because they have been authorised by the court.... but I wondered if the CCA was received before Judgement was entered. Going by the tone of the letter, I am enclined to think that it was....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, take a look at this site, might be of interest

(EDIT)I saw it advertised on credit expert.com

New Consumer Credit act regulatoins come into force tomorrow, making it easier to challenge the consumer credit act. Plus a website's been set up promising to allow people to check whether their loan/credit card agreement is enforceable:D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Court papers were issued before the CCA request was sent off.... so a CCJ was obtained without being challenged in court (by default). As it stands, a CCJ overrides a CCA request... and payments have to be made because they have been authorised by the court.... but I wondered if the CCA was received before Judgement was entered. Going by the tone of the letter, I am enclined to think that it was....

 

Yes, an uncontested Summons will result in a judgment and that CCJ will overrule any CCA as you state.

 

In fact A&L don't need to produce a CCA to enforce the debt because the debt has been "proven".

 

However, what you can do is ask for the judgment to be set aside on the basis of wanting to enter a defence and that may be why A&L are backing down, especially if the CCA was received before judgment because they know that you will be successful.

 

In fact I would be inclined do this anyway, even though it costs money.

 

Although they have said that they won't pursue it, a CCJ still exists and can be enforced at any point in the future (no 6 year limitation) - and it you wait ten years you may not be able to get it set aside because A&L could justifiably state that any CCA that did exist would have been destroyed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to one and all, Just read all your responses, whew where do I start. going to have to read and digest all you very welcolm comments. Unfortunatly got to put on hold just for this morning. Saturday. Im sure there's a lot of other questions now, as I really don't understand the law very much on this.

 

Get back to you all soon. and many thanks to all

Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, can you still send a CCA after a CCJ has been issued and are the DCA obliged to answer it or can they refuse on the grounds the debt has been proven?

Might need to utilise this one myself shortly.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, can you still send a CCA after a CCJ has been issued and are the DCA obliged to answer it or can they refuse on the grounds the debt has been proven?

Might need to utilise this one myself shortly.

I dont think they can refuse to send you one. But as said previously the CCJ still stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on the timing, and as this the CCJ was issued in default whilst the documentation for the defence was requested, then there is very good grounds for it to be set aside.

Apply to the court for a set aside hearing and atteh same time write to A&L and ask them to agree to the set aside, rather then defend at the hearing.

As someone mentions above it is important ot get thsi CCJ quashed as it could come back at any time in the future to haunt you.

  • Haha 1

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on the timing, and as this the CCJ was issued in default whilst the documentation for the defence was requested, then there is very good grounds for it to be set aside.

Apply to the court for a set aside hearing and atteh same time write to A&L and ask them to agree to the set aside, rather then defend at the hearing.

As someone mentions above it is important ot get thsi CCJ quashed as it could come back at any time in the future to haunt you.

 

Another very good reason for getting it set aside is that it will be removed from your credit file, whereas a judgment that the creditor has decided not to enforce will remain on for six years.

 

I completely agree with the above that if you do apply to get it set aside, copy in A&L explaining why and ask them to simply agree to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can A&L having been granted the CCJ go back to the court and ask for it to be struck off

 

They might be able to, but why would they.

 

At the end of the day, a debt is still owing, but A&L don't have the correct paperwork to be able to enforce it all the way.

 

Allowing the debtor to seek the judgment to be set aside without contesting it is one thing, but why would they take the effort to do this themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have requested that the current action be discontinued

 

It may be an idea to get A & L to elaborate on that statement.... so that you have something in writing, Bach. You will then know what action still needs to be taken re. the CCJ.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to all, Thanks so much for everyone's imput.

Iv just finished a letter to A L asking them to

 

 

Thank you for your letter dated 04/04/07 reference.............., ”.

I have noted your comments but seek clarification with regards to the statement

 

“in respect of legal action I have requested that the current action be discontinued"

 

Upon receiving your expanded explanation and if I then, fully understand the position I will be in contact with you further.

 

I will also ring the Court tomorrow and see what I can get from them in the way of info etc

Thanks again, if anyone thinks of anything else I can do at the moment please let me know,

Lynn

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi to all,

Letter recieved back from A & L. (12th April)

"As I had sort clarification in respect of legal action they can confirm that the legal action has been stopped."

 

Also recieved a letter from the Courts saying (17th April,) "

they have spoken to the solicitor and they confirm that this action is to be discontinued." the letter then goes on to say that

"we are informed that an application to set aside the Judgement is going to be made." No further payments are required and any further correspondence should be directed to A & L rather that Global

 

Letter recived from Solicitor (17th April) enclosed by way of service on you Notice of Discontinuance which today has been lodged with the County Court

 

Can any one help please what should I do now.

 

Thanks Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to all,

Letter recieved back from A & L. (12th April)

"As I had sort clarification in respect of legal action they can confirm that the legal action has been stopped."

 

Also recieved a letter from the Courts saying (17th April,) "

they have spoken to the solicitor and they confirm that this action is to be discontinued." the letter then goes on to say that

"we are informed that an application to set aside the Judgement is going to be made." No further payments are required and any further correspondence should be directed to A & L rather that Global

 

Letter recived from Solicitor (17th April) enclosed by way of service on you Notice of Discontinuance which today has been lodged with the County Court

 

Can any one help please what should I do now.

 

Thanks Lynn

 

What I would do is just go ahead with the application to set aside and take it from there.

 

However an expert might read something different into the exact wording they have used.

 

As I see it, they are basically saying is that the debt still exists, but because of a lack of documentation, they can't enforce it, or defend a set-aside, so they're going to put into the big "pending" tray for now.

 

In all likelihood, they probably won't ever find the documentation, but until 6 years go by and the Limitation Act kicks in, it will always be a possibility.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Court letter tells me that "an application to set aside the judgement is going to be made," what does it mean should I be doing this, if not who is?? sorry but not at all sure on all this Law

thanks lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bach,

 

Fantastic !! :D

 

I would read the letter as... A & L are going to make an appication for the judgement to be set aside.... because it was A & L who went for the CCJ regardless of your CCA request. You can now write and ask for confirmation of when this has been done.

 

You've done it Girlie !! Well done !! One more poke in the eye for A & L :p

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...