Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - Charging Order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5811 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there -- first post on here and why didn't I know about you guys a couple of years ago.

 

Lots of issues with debts the biggest one is a charging order over my house for about £13500 with Cabot. First question is do I have any real chance of this being overturned. Original debt goes back to 1992 with an ex partner for £4000.

I wont go into to much detail just yet but any thoughts please ??

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that I now know that it may have been statute barred at the time of granting. Although Cabot were trying to catch up with me no payments agreed payment plans were put in place---- they just tracked me down.

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest, what is your equity? If you have owned it for 15 years it must be rather impressive!

 

I dont think thats relevant is it

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only been in my current property since 2002 and taken out further mortgage and loans etc so basically no equity. Your saying that if I don't agree a payment plan that a sale could be forced anyway if they wanted to.

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is why I think I have nothing to loose by looking at the possibility of the order being rescinded. I appreciate that it would need to be looked at in depth, but if you still think not then thats fair enough.

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,Beau-don't mean to hijack your thread but would just like to say a HUGE thanks. Have learnt quite a bit about charging orders from you & Theo in the last hour or so & although it's not something I'm ecstatic about, it doesn't seem as bad as I first thought. When I found out yesterday my son had one of these from Eversheds I promptly burst into tears:o (Sorry its a mum thing-he may be 26 but he still worries me). Until then I'd never even heard of a charging order-interim or otherwise. Now I realise that as long as he keeps his payments up to date he should be OK-I think:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem moggieb I am a complete novice when it comes to this sort of thing and had to ask. Still this is a very serious matter and your son cannot sell the asset that the order is against without telling these leeches I would love to be able to wriggle out of this because they have me in line for another debt but I will make it alot harder for them to get this far next time.

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Charging Order is a creditors way of protecting their interests i.e. money.

 

If you go to the Official Land Registry website there will be publications on Charging Orders.

 

Its unlikely it will be removed from your title deeds as when the Land Registry receive the application to register the Order its already signed and sealed by the court. Though you should of been served notice of any court action and thats when you should of objected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh thanks BTB as I said when I started this thread I wish I had known about this forum 18 months - 2 years ago I perhaps would not have allowed it to get this far.

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still this is a very serious matter and your son cannot sell the asset that the order is against without telling these leeches.

 

hi again-he doesn't want to sell in fact he's trying his best to keep it. Like you if I'd known about this sooner I would have tried to help him. I've read somewhere that we could maybe have objected on the gounds that they weren't his biggest creditors and it would have been unfair to grant the charge to Eversheds. Still I guess its too late to cry over spilt milk as they say:) He has no equity yet so hopefully as Theo said a Judge would not order the sale if Evershed applied. (Fingers crossed!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Re-activating this thread due to some interest expressed by andrew1,

 

Original second charge on a property taken out with "Nationwide Credit Corporation Ltd" of London SE1 in March 1990 for £4k, the paperwork that I have even has the original T&C's.

I have statements for the account from inception to April 1995. From then onwards until May 2002 I have nothing. May 2002 Cabot served a default notice for in excess of 2k arrears. Then I have nothing until Dec 2005, during this period I was making Nominal payments per month.

 

December 2005 letter from Hodsons Solicitors having been instructed by Cabot Financial Europe Ltd who were administering the account on behalf of "Morley Ltd" explaining that although I was making payments that this was not enough to prevent their client issuing procedings.

 

Later that month procedings issued (head in sand time), I have still got original POC.

Not until May 2006 did I receive a Judgement notice asking for payment "Forthwith".

 

Sept 2006 Hodsons inform me that on xx August 2006 a charging order was granted and that on xx November 2006 this order will be made final.

 

No further contact until March 07 when Cabot start asking for payments against the account.

 

April 07 I receive a "Notice of Transfer of Procedings" to my local court for enforcement.

 

May 07 an AEO was asked for by "Morley Ltd" which I managed to fight off as I am self employed.

 

Feb 08 agree to start making nominal payments again which I now pay by SO.

 

So there it is I can probably fill in any gaps from memory but the main point I tried to raise in post 1 still applies today. I dont want false hope.

 

It would appear to me that unless I have missed something really dramatic that Cabot did illegaly then there is not much I can do.

 

BB

 

 

 

 

 

F

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...