Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA problem,help needed


gemini123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5900 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a new user of the forum,read many posts which are alredy posted ,some of them are similar of my problem but none is same so thought to start new thread,My problem is as under

I had a car which was crashed in a road accident,immidiatly after crash car was taken to a garage,(in scotland),3 days later i contacted the yard owner and told him that i want to scrap this car and requested him (scrap yard owner)to send me the tax disk so i can claim back my road tax.

He posted me the tax disk and asked for a covering letter or consent letter to scrap the car along with log book(v5).I sent him both covering letter and log book,

Took a v14 form filled that up and sent to the dvla for tax refund posted on 5th Sep07(car was taxed until 30/11/07),got a cheque from DVLA few days after for the amount £19.17,(two months tax)

A month after i got apenalty letter from DVLA that you were the registered keeper on 05/09/07 of the car and you did not declaire SORN (its clearly stated on their website if u have sold or scrap the car you dont need to declaire sorn)

Press release 16: DVLA reminds motorists to ensure vehicle tax or SORN is up to date )

 

I've written them a letter and told all the story about car but they sent me a letter stating that THANK YOU FOR TELLING US ABOUT NEW OWNER but you still have to pay penalty

 

Today got the final notice

So what to do now pls help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gemini and welcome to CAG :)

 

DVLA are a nightmare at the best of times. Although I can't help you with your enquiry, I've asked a MOD to move your thread to our DVLA forum (see link below) where you will get more specific advice on your situation.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dvla/

 

Good Luck!

 

Bo :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey no worries Gemini. You have posted on the right forum to start with as it gives us the opportunity to say hello to you!

 

One of our nice MODs will come and move your thread to the DVLA forum. In the meantime, click on the link I gave you and have a read through :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to take you glory away gemini, but your problem is exactly like all the other. That problem is the DVLA are not a tax issuing office or records keeping office, they are a government money making office, and no matter what you think the problem, they will send you a penalty notice.

 

Yes it does say that on their website, but what it means is that you need to send them the section of the log book signed that it has been scrapped and that will negate any need for tax or sorn.

 

Until they receive some notice that the car has been scrapped, they cannot amend the record and accordingly the car is still out there somewhere untaxed.

 

I am assuming that you gave the whole log book to the scrappy and never sent your part to DVLA.

You will need to ring or visit the scrappy and get the bit you need to send off from him or get him to send his notification.

 

Unfortunately until DVLA receive either of these you will remain the registered keeper and liable for payments due.

 

There is a chance the car could be put back on the road and if it gets caught in speeding cameras or issued with parking tickets, you will also be liable for payment of those as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff is right - you should never have surrendered the whole V5.

 

You should have completed the yellow section (S.9) and sent that separately to the DVLA.

 

I'm afraid that you are liable. You are still the RK because a) you have failed to notify the DVLA, and b) the scrapper has not notified them of scrapping the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx for help first of all

but as I mensioned that a V14 form has been sent as well (when i sent V14 then car was taxed) and they have recieved that because they sent me the tax refund.And according to DVLA website IF YOU CLAIM REFUND THEN SEND A V14 INSTED OF SORN

Is it considerable ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx for help first of all

but as I mensioned that a V14 form has been sent as well (when i sent V14 then car was taxed) and they have recieved that because they sent me the tax refund.And according to DVLA website IF YOU CLAIM REFUND THEN SEND A V14 INSTED OF SORN

Is it considerable ?

 

The V14 has a space for declaring SORN - did you complete this part fo the form? I would suspect not as you believed that the car was to be scrapped. But the form also states that you must inform the DVLA that you have passed it onto a trader (you oly declare scrapping if you do it yourself)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...