Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. Pro-bono means 'free'
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help With A Repossession From Blemein Finance


webbscatering
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ANY late payment charge of a fixed rate

whereby the creditor cannot or will not give you or the authorities

a full breakdown of WHY being late costs them £XX each time is unlawful.

 

go read the OFT guidance on PENALTY charges.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi web

 

I asked how much your loan was for and when you took out this loan so I could see whether it was a regulated agreement, the answers you gave would make your agreement unregulated.

 

A regulated agreement is one that has a specific set of rules on what must be done.

 

Consumer credit act 1974 covers some loans, so lenders have to follow the rules set by the CCA 1974.

 

MCOB usually apply to first charge mortgages (a standard mortgageto buy your home) so lenders have to follow the rules in MCOB.

 

As your loan is not regulated then there is no specific set of rules that apply to your loan,that doesn’t mean there is no rules that the lender has to follow.

 

A few rules and regulations that do apply to your loan agreement are listed below.

 

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

 

Unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations 1999

 

s.140a consumer credit act 1974

 

What I read a lot about is that people are saying that their lenders are adding charges to their accounts and that they think this is unfair,(but why is it unfair ) something is only unfair if a specific rule or regulation say it is unfair.

 

So to understand unfairness then you first have to know the rules and regulations that make something unfair, I have posted three regulations above and each one will answer the question as to why it is unfair to charge £35 for a phone call (example)

 

Web if you (or anyone else) read the above regulations and post up why it is unfair to add charges to an account then hopefully others will join in and we get a debate going, then anyone reading this post in future will understand unfairness in consumer contracts.

 

As for blemain being a member of ConsumerCredit Trade Association, this is just to help blemain it will doyou no good at all, blemain being a member is like someone joining a union inwork it just helps them.

 

wp3

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for this Welshperson3,

 

I agree with everything you have written

 

but with my case which I hope sets it apart from others is I have not missed a payment

 

but did not pay on the exact day it was due which was the 12th of every month

 

but made all payments at the end of every month.

 

Having contacted them to try change the date

 

they would not do it without a Variation Order,

 

this order appears to apply to have a CCJ changed

 

but having looked into it this could be done without the need of a variation order especially moving a date by two weeks.

 

This is what I see as unfair is their inability to help with changing a date and by doing so earns them money for late payments

 

also we have been notified that the money does not reach their account some 2 to three days later

 

therefore allowing them to apply more late payment fees.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Web you asked about a template letter for claiming charges back from blemain, this company isn’t that easy,

 

You need to consider your options on how to deal with this,but most importantly don’t rush, research and understand then decide what to do.

wp3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok let’s look at your options (there is no easy one)

 

1 you carry on exactly as you are and blemain carry on adding charges, you get to the end of your agreement and realistically blemain will say you still owe us over £20,000 but we are wiling for you to carry on paying us monthly until you pay us what we want.

 

2 you carry on exactly as you are and blemain carry on adding charges, you get to the end of your agreement and realistically blemain will say you still owe us over £20,000 you say no I don’t, blemain then start court proceedings and you defend against this.

 

3 you take out another loan to pay blemain off now (including the charges already added to your account)

 

4 sell your house, blemain have a charge so will get repaid along with all their unfair charges.

 

5 ask blemain to stop adding charges, you have already tried this but there is a possibility you may be able to get them to stop,

 

6 you can start court proceedings now to stop them adding charges and remove the ones already added to your account.

 

7 you can start court proceedings sometime in the future to stop them adding charges and remove the ones already added to your account.

 

There may be other options but the only ones I can think of where you don’t pay blemain more that they are entitled to are options 2 6 7 above and they all involve the court.

 

Personally I think you should use option 5 above, and stop asking them to change a payment date, and start telling them that it is unfair not to change a payment date. ( something is unfair because a rule or regulation or the OFT/FSA or FCA say it is unfair not because you don’t like it)

 

While you are trying option 5 research, learn and prepare yourself for option 2 or 7 I would like to say there is an easy option, but as your loan is un regulated then the reality is pay them or go to court. ( prepare yourself first )

 

Wp3

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you wp3 for you exceptionally good work on my issue, I might firstly make things easier by reverting back to paying the loan on the due date that should settle that argument then persue the charges, or secondly fight to change the date and fight for the charges, I think my first option sounds better

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is it you are dealing with at Blemain?

Are you speaking to them on the phone or is everything in writing? Send an email to the collections email address and put it for the attention of Steve Allott, Customer Support Manager. A few people have done that and got somewhere. Worth a shot while considering the above options!

 

Also I'd request an up to date statement. I received a letter a few days ago advising of the new charge for going into arrears, when my original complaint was about £30 phone calls. Have a look to see if you've got old charges on your account you could claim back as it looks like they've changed it (maybe to do with the fine?)

 

Good luck. CO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth a shot like you've said also I have been dealing with Julia France who has a more aggressive approach to dealing with customer complaints. Will pen an email later requesting a full set of statements for the last 7 years

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im starting to get the picture now having read various threads and sites,

this one in particular took my interest which I posted on too

 

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2012/09/arrears-warrants-and-abuse-of-process/

 

My plan is to ascertain the magnitude of the charges applied to the account

 

so an SAR is going off today personally I dont think they will obligate this.

 

I have just figured out that we have made the monthly contractual payments

plus an additional payment off the arrears

 

but due to the charges the additional payments have been swallowed up with charges

therefore the arrears are not going down.

 

What I am trying to say is they could not take us to court for repossession

due to the fact the payment we make off the arrears is made as a seperate payment

from the contractual payment

 

so any laymen looking at our account will clearly see they are taking that particular payment just for charges.

 

Not riveting stuff but adds weight to my argument :wink:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im starting to get the picture now havingread various threads and sites,

this one in particular took my interestclip_image002.png whichI posted on too

 

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2012/0...se-of-process/

 

The above case is a perfect example of how blemain operate, and shows that you should never trust anything they say.

 

My plan is to ascertain the magnitude of the charges applied to the account

 

so an SARclip_image003.png isgoing off today personally I dont think they will obligate this.

 

A good start and you are right they won’t comply, but the court is there to make them comply, threaten them with it and then use it if you have to.

 

I have just figured out that we have made the monthly contractual payments

plus an additional payment off the arrears

 

but due to the charges the additional payments have been swallowed up withcharges

therefore the arrears are not going down.

 

If what you are saying is correct then this wouldn’tbe allowed, wait for a response to your SAR and you can deal with this when you have the proof.

 

What I am trying to say is they could not take us to court for repossession

due to the fact the payment we make off the arrears is made as a seperatepayment

from the contractual payment

 

so any laymen looking at our account will clearly see they are taking thatparticular payment just for charges.

 

Not riveting stuff but adds weight to my argument clip_image005.png

 

They can and do change payment dates after a judgment,

 

The truth is if they changed your payment dates then they will lose £50 a month arrears fee from you, and then they would have to do the same for everyone, and the poor buggers have just been forced to stop adding all the other unfair charges, (give them a brake will you )

 

 

 

It took me 2 years of asking, begging and pleading but then for some unknown reason they did change my payment date. (and there was a court order on my agreement)

 

 

 

When you have proof that they are taking your arrears payments and using them to pay charges then make a decision on how to deal with it.

 

 

 

Something for everyone to think about, if blemain are charging you unfair fees and you intend on challenging them in court, then why rush one years’ worth of charges, or five years’worth of charges removed from your account means the same =£0 in charges you have to pay so don’t rush in know what you are doing first.

 

 

 

For me five years of charges and interest = approximately £10,000, amount I did pay in charges and interest =£0,00

 

Wp3

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

fixed sum fees

 

 

ie letter debt management late arrears

£20 £25 sums like that

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

at their mortgage rate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno ask my stupid spell checker

 

Compound at their rate

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno ask my stupid spell checker

 

Compound at their rate

Okay, My arrears was about 3k and I agreed to pay it off at £50 per month which is coming to an end soon but during the five period they applied £490 back on the account in interest on arrears. Not only that they charged us £45 late payment fee per month for being 14days late paying our mortgage which seems a bit unfair to me do you agree?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can reclaim any penalty arrears letter debt advisor fees

no matter what their reason for charging it

they are a penalty- thus unlawful - end of

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

doesn't matter its interest it doesn't go on the sheet.

 

only fixed sum penalty charges like £40 letter, visit fee etc.

 

if its int as a result of those charges that what the sheet works out and thus refunds it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

interest on arrears is that legal as I believe thats what "Actuarial Interest" is

 

so for example I make the monthly payment of £545 plus £50 off the arrears

they then apply back to my account £524 in "Actuarial Interest" and £45 late payment charge, therefore £16 is paid off my monthly charge

 

cheers DX its all clear now thanks,

 

just one more question

 

we are about to clear the arrears off this account

 

how do we get the possession order cancelled

 

as I have read stories where Blemein have said the order has been cancelled but in reality it has not.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...