Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have you asked for advice from your students union people? HB
    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hello help needed charging order threat


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5894 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. I have been reading various posts and there seems to be alot of info and helpfull people on this site.

I was hoping someone could help me.

The problem I have have is in 2004 I took out an unsecured Natwest personal loan over 4 years. After paying for 2 years we moved house and got into financial difficulty. I contacted Natwest and they agreed to defer interest and I paid £70 per month to them. I then reclaimed bank charges of them and was awarded £1060. This was put onto the balance of the loan. I asked on telephone if I could temp stop installments as charges covered them so I could get back on my feet with other creditors and then hopefully increase my payments to Natwest. this was agreed over telephone with Natwest in June 07. I have now received a solicitors letter saying they are taking me to court and getting a charging order on property. Can they do this? I have no CCj recorded from Natwest. I would like to know if they get a CCJ, can they then go and get a charging order right away or would I just need to keep up the payments set out in court agreement? Should I pay the payments missed which are about £500.00. I could do this as I have sold my car.

Any advice would be a help. I have been trying to contact CAB for over week but cant get through and I cant afford to see a solicitor.

Thank you and sorry its a long post.:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they defaulted you regarding the loan?

A loan is not usually repayable on demand, and if you are not in default, catching up the arrears would certainly help.

If you are in default, they would be able to begin the court process. If you are able to come to an agreement to repay the arrears and stick to a repayment program they are unlikey to go down that route, unless you have had a history of problems with them before.

How much is actually outstanding on the loan. You have paid for half the term and had your reclaimed chgs put into it also- it can't be a vast sum. It would be very unusal for a court to agree to a charging order for a small sum, especially when you are happy to continue with repayments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. Yes the loan was defaulted. It was originally for 18000 over 4 years at 466 per month. When we had financial difficuly they also cancelled our account with a 2k overdraft. with charges and everything the total we owe is 14500. We where paying this off at 70 per month and they where happy.

Can we do anything to stop charging order. Will court give us CCJ and as long as we stick to agreed payment will they not be able to get charging order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot get a charging order if you are willing to pay instalments. It sounds as if they are being a bit heavy handed. If they do issue proceedings and you get the judge to accept that you can pay £70 a month it will mean you have a CCJ but it will also mean that they cannot pester you any more.

 

There is a lot of bad behaviour going on with people threatening charging orders - a way of changing an unsecured debt into a secured one.

 

I suspect that if you renew your offer of £70 a month and confirm in writing to them that you were allowed a 'payment holiday' due to the charges refund they might back off - as they will no doubt realise that they will not get anything more by taking you to court. And a charging order is 'in their dreams' if you can make payments.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they frozen future interest etc by the way? I would hate to think of you paying £70 a month and them charging you £150 a month in interest and late payment charges. It happens.... Another advantage (:mad:) of it going to court.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for that. We are not sure about interest. We have sent Natwest's solicitors our income and expenditure along with offer of payment for 80 per month. They advised that they will forward the details to Natwest with our offer and in the meantime the court have sent us an allocations questionaire and moved the court to our local one.

We have no proof that we could take a payment holiday. It was agreed on telephone. However this was in June 07 and we have never received a reminder to say we should still be paying.

Please can you advise what we can do.

 

s for that. We are not sure about interest. We have sent Natwest's solicitors our income and expenditure along with offer of paymHi

Thank

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you say you would be defending the claim fully? I presume that's why it has been transferred to local court. It sounds as if the solicitors have misled you slightly as I don't think they can go for a charging order at the same time as a CCJ.

 

I am going to seek advice from more knowledgeable people who should be able to help you better than I can. Watch this space;)

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have now received a letter from the solicitors to advise Natwest will agrre to 80 per month as long as I sign a consent form to agree to a judgement against us and that they may apply for a charging order. Also that the agreement will be reviewed in 6 months.

I am unsure what to do. I dont mind about the judgement but really do not agree with a charging order. It doesnt seem fair and If I ever need to sell my property as we have a large mortgage I wont have very much equity to buy another and we are a family with 2 children.

Should we sign or say we agree to everything except charging order. Or should we go to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am not sure where you stand here as they have already issued a court claim. I think if it was me I would be tempted to refuse their kind offer and insist on going to court in person. I would perhaps say that I agree in principle to their acceptance of the £80 per month but that I would prefer to have this clarified by the court. What worries me is that if you sign the agreement they can then go to court, without you present, and get a charging order without your consent. I think that now the court is involved you would benefit from the court's protection rather than playing into their hands.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...