Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AOL playing silly games again


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5862 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok,

 

Here we go, we signed up for AOl to provide our internet, OK all well and fine up untill Wednesday, when it went off line, no broadband what so ever tried everything to fix it on the desktop and on Julie's laptop, nothing, so called Helpline, told us to ring Netgear who the router is made by. Netgear told us nothing that they could do, to go back to AOL.

 

So yesterday we spent 6hours on the phone and via live help, to finally be told by a supervisor to re downlaod config software for the router, we did now it took over an hour as we have had to go back to DIAL UP, so back to using one computer, with the wife unable to go wireless, because the router has packed up.

 

So one bod told us that we could either purchase a new router from them or take out a new 18month contract(not a chance, because of their crap service, we won't be staying with them).

 

So in the end the supervisor, told us that she would put a note on the account saying all that we had done durring the 6hours spent on help with them.

 

So finally at 9 last Julie goes back on live help and tells them to bring up details for our number, which the bod does(or should have done) he then tells Julie he can give her the number to Netgear, she tells bod that he hasn't looked at screen and read what sup has put on the note, as he would have seen that we had already done that and everything else, that they had tried.

 

Julie this morning has rung the MAC code department to tell them that we want to cancel due to them being unable to fix the problem, so MAC code bod says you are in a contract term, to which Julie replys, you might think we are but seeing as you have never met your T&C's, as when we took out the internet with them, they were supossed to give us a wireless router, we have had countless routers sent by them, that don't work and that have been returned we have also spent over a £100 on phone calls trying to get this sorted. We have used our own Nertgear router, AOL have never suplied us with a router, to get their service. Bod also said we would have to buy out the rest of suposed contract(no chance)

 

Where do we stand have AOL broken the T&C's???

 

Let us know.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont trust dogs bodies on the phone when they say "heres my supervisor" or "hold on im talking to a supervisor" THEY LIE! I caught one out sitting silently when apparently discussing my case with a supervisor because she forgot to MUTE her headset(I have worked in call centres and know all the tricks) the one before must have passed me to the person sitting next to them and said heres my supervisor. I know this because another normal compalints advisor was able to overide the decision an apparent supervisor gave me about being bound to a contract we knew nothing about!

 

Try Consumer Direct Id stick to your guns dont take another 18 month contract and be tied to them, if you also dont know how or why you are in contract now with them then id fight with them about that too. It seems that the call centre staff from other countries are good at putting you on new contracts without your knowlege or consent but it seems you hit a brick wall proving it and finding out who to complain to about it apart from AOL where its probably filed in the bin! An upgrade or downgrade of package can give them cause to restart a new 18 month contract apparently but still they should not do it without telling you it will 1st and giving you the option to go ahead or not. Basically anytime you call for anything they will try finding a way to restart a new 18 month contract so you are tied to them, they need investigating bigtime. It seems the online complaints form has dissapeared(no surprises there) so it looks like you will have to do it via the excallation process and send it via recorded snail mail Step-by-Step Escalation Process - AOL Help the links etc are on that page. In the end I threatened them with legal action and considering we didnt use aol software so could not possible have clicked to accept any new contract which is meant to happen then they didnt have a leg to stand on, they also couldnt supply a transcript of the apparent conversation over the phone where we were made aware of and accepted the new contract, funny that!

 

I was an AOL customer for a long time with no problems, carphone warehouse buys them over and they go to pot! Would never reccomend them ever bunch of lying cowboys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gary

 

No more phone calls, you have already seen that they cost the earth and solve nothing.

You don't say how long you have been with them, but yes they have terminated the contract. I have said this before, contracts are 'two' way and they cannot break their side and expect you to continue with yours.

 

You must now write to them terminating the contract because they have broken it by non supply or resolution.

 

Did you get your mac code?

 

Remember to do this with recorded delivery, as with all disputes, you need a paper trail. They can deny all that has been said on the phone up to now and you can't prove anything.

 

If they give you any grief then I would sar them and make sure you highlight that you want the phone call records.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

been off line due the fact, that AOL did as we asked and ended our contract in the afternoon.

 

With no get out fee(like I was really going to pay that, I told them to take me to court for it)

 

So we had to wait, we have moved back to Sky, which started yesterday, so we are back online(thank god)

 

SO AOL can goto hell, their is no way we are ever going back to them.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep I agree with Jon. Id still send them a strongly worded recorded delivery letter and keep copies outlining their failure to provide you with a service you paid for, keep the thumb screws on and eventually they will sod off for good and leave you alone. Doing this will also give you ammo for disputes if they decide to send a DCA ****** after you, Id complain to anyone who will listen, offcom, TS, consumer direct etc.

 

Not sure if I put it before but also fill in a complaint to their trade body CISAS: Communications & Internet Services Adjudication Scheme basically get their nuts in a vice and keep tightening till they appologize and leave you alone for good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...