Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Double Glazing Sales Issues


hirsty2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Before I start, I would like to point out that I am well aware of my naivite in this matter, but the salesman was so convincing that I totally trusted him.

 

I recently purchased UPVC double glazing for a front door and side window for by basement flat. Aware that we lived in a conservation area, I specifically asked the question of the salesman whether planning permission would be required and received the response "Yes normally you would, but because you are below ground level and out of normal eye view the normal rules do not appy and you can install what you like. Even if you had required planning permission we would certainly take care of that for you and have a great relationship with all of the local officers". I know - NAIVE!!

 

Anyway we wnt ahead on the basis that a surveyor was booked to come round and that the company were FENSA approved (and that they would take care of any planning permission issues).

 

6 weeks after the windows were fitted we received a letter from the local planning office detailing that we were in contravention of local permission regulations and needed to replace the window and door.

 

I have spoken to the company director and he is adamant that the salesman never made the statement and that it was not their problem to resolve.

 

I maintain that at best they lied to get my business and at worst are negligent in not seeking proof of planning permission before going ahead with the works.

 

Any comments or help appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hirsty

 

You shouldn't think of yourself as naive, there is no reason at all why you shouldn't believe that a company doing this for a living wouldn't have a good working relationship with the planning office, they must be in contact with them almost daily.

 

I would write to the planning office first, explain all what you have said above and ask if there is a chance of retrospective planning permission. If they say no, ask if you can have time to sort it out with the company, and how much time they will let you have. They wont be demanding that you pull it down immediately.

Make sure you let the planning office know the name of the company, and you might even get some help from them.

 

As glazing sales usually ask that two of you are present, were you accompanied or by yourself when the salesman called?

 

It would make things easier if there was two of you.

 

Assuming that the planning office say no to retrospective permission, write to the glazing company, don't do telephone any more, and ask for a face to face meeting with the boss and the salesman so you can put it to him personally, don't accept the salesman calling around to your home.

 

Any further action will depend on what the glazing company have to say.

 

With the reputation that double glazing salesmen have, if this went all the way to court and the judge had the choice of who to believe, you or the salesman, I know who he would give the benefit of the doubt to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DEFINITELY! There may be other complaints also. May also be worth trying your own mystery shop. Have a friend invite these people round and ask the same question (record it). It will not prove that it was said to you, but DOES prove that they are saying it, which adds credence to your own claim, which may assist matters.

 

It is worth mentioning that, in future, ALWAYS ask for anything said to you to be pointed out in the contract. If they cannot do so, then it is either a lie or a [problem]. Verbal comments are difficult if not impossible to prove. Written contracts are a lot easier!

 

I'm sorry that this ha happened to you, but I do hope that you will in future take time to make sure of everything said to you. Legitimate organisations will be happy to let you check things or mull over the details. Conment and dodgy persons in general will want your signature there and then (the sooner that commission sales is criminalised the better).

 

In future:

Always read the terms before signing - a legitimate company will happily let you do this (and indeed should encourage it)

Always check what is said to you. Is it in the contract? Does the seller have the knowledge or expertise to say what they are saying? Even if it appears so, there is nothing wrong in checking it out before signing.

 

Hope that helps and good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...