Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Kingshill and duplicate defaults


kill bill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year i received a letter from cabot stating that they had "brought" the debt from monument credit card.

 

i have never responded to the requests for payment etc.

 

i have just looked on my credit report and have noticed that as well as the default being on my report from monument that kingshill which i now know to be another trading name of cabot have registered a default as well as monument.

 

i have never received a notice of default from cabot/kingshill.

 

so are they entitiled to duplicate a default on someones credit file when the default was never with them in the first place and if they have never issued a default letter can they legally/correctly put that on my file.

 

at the end of the day do i raise a dispute with equifax and the others creit reference companies or take it up with cabot.

 

i dont particulary want to deal with cabot in the fact that they will continually harrass - like they do with alot of people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry, I've just noticed that you haven't had a reply yet. This isn't my area of expertise............. but hopefully somebody will be along soon to advise you further/point you in the right direction.

 

Best of luck :-)

 

Saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the day do i raise a dispute with equifax and the others creit reference companies or take it up with cabot.

 

You can take it up with Equifax.
Last year i received a letter from cabot stating that they had "brought" the debt from monument credit card.

The Notice of Assignment should have come from Monument not Cabot. If I had your details I could send you a letter stating I had bought your Monument account. Would you pay me?

 

Have you sent Cabot a CCA request and a harassment by telephone letter yet?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok First things first You could put a Notice of Correction on to your credit file, but as pointed out to myself from others in the cabot fan club this is a waste of time as potential creditors do not read that section.

 

having two registered defaults for the same account is not allowed.

 

Under the Data Protection Act 1999 Schedule 1 Part 1(The principles)

 

“3. Personal data shall be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purpose or purposes for which they are processed.
4. Personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.
Also get a CCA off to Cabot/Kingshill to make sure they have a legal right to be demanding monies from you also you should have received a notice of assignment.

 

Further to CCA make sure your first line in the letter is "I do not acknowledge this debt to you or anyone you represent."

 

Send a £1 postal order also just print your name on the letter don't sign it.

 

Sending the CCA will at the very least in my experience get them to suspend the account so they will stop adding interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See my thread here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/126290-monument-cabot-default-mysteries.html

 

Monument are pi$$takers and seem to think that both they and Cabot can record the default with the CRA's.

 

Technically, as Cabot have bought the debt,it should be them continuing to record the default.

 

Write to the CRA's and point this out to them. They will then contact Barclaycard directly (who own Monument), and Barclaycard will instruct the CRA to remove the default under their name, leaving the Cabot default.

 

You can then start to deal with the issues with Cabot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In relation to Cabot (don't know about other DCA's) the sales agreement between the lender and Cabot specifies that the responsibility of reporting of the Default will pass to Cabot following assignment.

 

 

You need to contact the CRA's quoting the reference of your credit file and detailing the problem. They will contact both companies and finally correct your credit file

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

update - i did speak to experian by phone who stated that it is incorrect that barblaycard have not marked my account as satisfied when they "sold" the debt on and they are going to file a dispute on my behalf.

 

funny though i have not received any letter from caboot for the past 3 months - lets hope it stays that way

 

when they first called me i twigged on and told them they had the wrong number- they tried a few more times till i just hung up when i recgonsided the number - lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I had this problem 2 years ago - and all the b*****ds did was stick there head in the sand. The only thing that will clear it is the ICO (Information Comissioners Office). They are wonderful, friendly and the b*****ds are afraid of them

 

They are the only ones who will force them to do anything - and they get a nice big fine if they don't do as they are told

 

Del

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...