Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Medical records sent to me contained some notes of another person.


cedartree
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5890 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

When I recieved the GP medical records I requested they contained some notes of another persons medical records.

Who do I make a complaint to as this puts me at risk of seeing anothers patients records that has an address written on.

They are old notes from the old paper notes era called LLoyd George paper notes. Also I think taht the patient is supposed to by law be informed of the breech of security.

Can anyone give advise on this.

 

Regards cedartree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

If they are supposed to be informed, contact whoever sent the forms, unless of course, you want to just shred them?

 

Do you really want to open pandoras box?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't this a problem for the information commisioner?

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since information has been disclosed unlawfully i.e this is not your information There has been a breach the Data Protection act.

 

You can advise the surgery of this mistake and return them to the Managing Director of the practice your registered with.

 

You can claim either two things your post and package back or brownie point's.

 

Having worked in A doctors surgery before I would imagine someone is wetting themselves around about now.

 

This is the best course of action and I'd advise you to do it sharp ish.

 

Send this......

 

Dear (insert

 

I can kindly confirm receipt of my medical files which i requested on (insert date here)

 

However there seems to have been a clerical error.

 

You have disclosed copies of another patients records.

 

I Have enclosed the records that you sent and await your further instructions.

 

Yours

 

(insert your name and sign the letter)

 

=

 

 

 

Please note this could have been a doctor who might have had a lot of patients that day and he could of filled the notes incorrectly.

 

Hope this helps

 

Josh

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only thought the DPA applied to electronic forms of media, not handwritten items.

All opinions & information are the personal view of the poster, and are not that of any organisation, company or employer. Any information disclosed by the poster is for personal use only. Permission to process this data under the Data Protection act is NOT GIVEN to any company, only personal readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data protection act Applies on all forms of Data.

 

With out sounding horrible this is not my intention, what lead you to this conclusion?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing new for medical records, a hospital pulled mine out for my sister when she was in labour unexpectedly because we both have the same initials. You could imagine her face when they started going on about an op I had just had so she shouldnt be pregnant, fortunatly she saw the funny side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, having thought that people aren't quite giving the right answer, I looked it up on the Data Comissionaers website.

 

Low and behold - If they are handwritten, then there is no requirement to notify.

 

EDIT: And before anyone mentions it, yes I know it still means that they have to comply with DPA legislation - but it makes prosecution near on impossible when there is no named person as a data controller.

 

The ICO website is very informative though - including a lot of press releases on prosecutions, including a solicitor for not notifying.

All opinions & information are the personal view of the poster, and are not that of any organisation, company or employer. Any information disclosed by the poster is for personal use only. Permission to process this data under the Data Protection act is NOT GIVEN to any company, only personal readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But thats manual intervention

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If you feel strongly about it and want to take it further, you should write to the responsible PCT giving full details. They should have someone there who will take it up with the surgery concerned as it is something that should not have happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...