Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG - claim they do not have a copy default


Matt5791
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been pestering Egg for a copy of a default notice - they have told me that they do not keep copies and so are not liable to give me one, but assure me it was issued.

 

Can anyone tell me the true score on this - firstly does anyone know if there is an obligation under the Consumer C.A to produce a copy?

 

Note: the debt is settled.

 

Thanks

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses - can anyone point me in the direction of the relevent section of the Act, regulation or court decision which stipulates they must keep the paperwork?? (the default was issued in 2004) Thanks.

 

....yes I did get a good deal on the settlement.

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reproduced courtesy of Tomterm8

 

For example according to sections 221 and 222 of the Companies Act 1985, a public company is required to maintain records for a period of six years (section 222(5)(b). As a loan agreement is active until the agreement is terminated, I would suggest that all the payment records (and other documents making up the file - including the agreement/application etc) would be "live" until the account is paid, or terminated - thus, the full file should be retained for at least six years after that.

 

This interpretation fits in with Inland Revenue legislation that requires prime documents to be retained for a period of six years - AFTER THE END OF THE RELEVANT ACCOUNTING PERIOD. That would mean some files need to be retained for up to seven years. The relevant legislation is found in Schedule 18 of the Finance Act 1998 (paragraph 21) - of particular significance is sub-paragraph (6).

 

Finally, key documents/application forms etc must be kept until 5 years after that business relationship has ended. This is a requirement of The Money Laundering Regulations 1993, 2003 and 2007. I am considering reporting the matter to the financial crimes division of the treasury

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting

 

Dealing with something on my wife's behalf for Egg

 

We asked for the default notice but they didn't send it, and we have since found it

 

The default notice is very vague, doesn't mention the amount outstanding on the alleged debt, and just says that instalments of £275 are required to remedy the breach, without saying how many instalments and dates to pay it by (add to that the monthly payment on the original agreement was different to the £275 instalments asked for on the default)

 

Wonder how many of there other default notices are like this, as they just seem like figures plucked from nowhere

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I too have asked for my CCA (out of interest really, just to see if they have it) and they told me the same thing..."please refer to the one you signed when you opened the account. We are an internet based bank and, as a result, do not keep paper copies".....er....ok.....!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MR2Phil

 

Under the 2004 legislation they do not have to have paper copies or signed docuements if the whole trasnaction was done on-line and after April 2004. However, they must be able to produce the equivalent - a printout of the form you filled in on line including the prescribed terms and a ticked box indicating that you agree to them.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks. Mine was before then though. I can't remember now if I did the whole application online or not, guess I must have. Anyway, I'm not too bothered, I just mentioned it in an email to them in the hope that it'd gee them up with getting my statements to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...