Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Return of PPI from Cap 1


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I opened c/card account in sept 2004 and was only aware in march 2006 that i was paying ppi monthly on any outstanding balance at a rate of 79 pence per £100. I then cancelled the ppi. At no time did i sign for this and aswell as this i was self employed. I got a copy of all my statements and totalled the ppi up and requested a refund of the money (£360.00).

They have replied by telling me that i was sold the ppi over the phone, and said they told me it was optional and that i agreed to it.They also said that they sent me the terms and conditions which is also untrue. Should i ask them to send me another copy of the agreement or just go on to the LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I opened c/card account in sept 2004 and was only aware in march 2006 that i was paying ppi monthly on any outstanding balance at a rate of 79 pence per £100. I then cancelled the ppi. At no time did i sign for this and aswell as this i was self employed. I got a copy of all my statements and totalled the ppi up and requested a refund of the money (£360.00).

They have replied by telling me that i was sold the ppi over the phone, and said they told me it was optional and that i agreed to it.They also said that they sent me the terms and conditions which is also untrue. Should i ask them to send me another copy of the agreement or just go on to the LBA stage.

 

Hello Carl,

 

The onus will be on them to prove that you agreed to it, I would ask them for a copy of your credit agreement and a copy of the telephone recording that you agreed to it.

 

Continue on your course of action at your timescales:grin:

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello.

 

Did you do a SAR

 

It costs £10 and they have 40days to comply under the data protection act. You will find it in the ppi sticky. Full SAR for ppi. Make sure you ask for all telephone recordings as well.

 

For your credit agreement you need to send a request under section 77/78 of the consumer credit act. If you go to the main page of the forum go to the general debt forum click on the creditor/debtors template letter, copy and paste letter N. Add your details and post it recorded delivery, they have 12 working days + 2 days postage, before defaulting and if after a further 30days they do not supply it they have committed a criminal offence.

 

I would personally make sure I had all of the information that you require to make a successful claim before sending your lba

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had already sent a S.A.R. when claiming back my charges but only asked for the statements and wasnt aware at the time that you could claim the ppi fees back. Should I send a new separate one for the telephone conversations and one for section 77/78 for a copy of the credit agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

hello carl,

 

when you submit your complaint to the FOS you will need to send copies of all the letters to and from Cap 1 up to date, ie your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), their response and any other follow up letters. This allows the Ombudsman to look at both sides and then make a decision. It will take a while but if the FOS does not uphold your complaint you still have the option of going to Court.

 

hope this helps

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello carl,

 

I did not bother to tell them initially. My first complaint is about the failure of the bank to comply fully with my SAR. They made the going hard so I made a complaint to the ICO with copies to the FOS, FSA, OFT and British Bankers Association.

My letter reclaiming PPI goes tomorrow. check out my thread...

alanalana PPI claim against RBS (looking for some help) please

and you will get the general idea posts 23, 40, 47 and 96 may be helpful to you. You can see how I have approached it.

 

Good luck

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried this and went throught to the FOS but was turned down as they said they had prove i had ticked a box on my internet aplication requesting infomation/cover on PPI so i lost as the FOS said i had been sold iy corectly even though i had proveided evidance that i was told on the phone by one of there customer sales team tyhat i would be refused a card unless i took out a PPI

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi lenny, i find the fos to be very long winded way of getting a result.

i am in court with cap1 in 9 days as i dispute the box thats been ticked on the application form.

have you done the sar and requested all the details regarding ppi.

then take them to court, they might pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...