Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
    • Regarding a driver, that HAS paid for parking but input an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number.   This is an easy mistake to make, especially if a driver has access to more than one vehicle. First of all, upon receiving an NTK/PCN it is important to check that the Notice fully complies with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 before deciding how to respond of course. The general advice is NOT to appeal to the Private Parking Company as, for example, you may identify yourself as driver and in certain circumstances that could harm your defence at a later stage. However, after following a recent thread on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that, in the case of inputting an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number, which is covered by “de minimis” it may actually HARM your defence at a later stage if you have not appealed to the PPC at the first appeal stage and explained that you DID pay for parking and CAN provide proof of parking, it was just that an incorrect VRN was input in error. Now, we all know that the BPA Code of Practice are guidelines from one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans to follow, but my thoughts are that there could be problems in court if a judge decides that a motorist has not followed these guidelines and has not made an appeal at the first appeal stage, therefore attempting to resolve the situation before it reaches court. From BPA Code of Practice: Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant). It is appreciated that in issuing a PCN in these instances, the operator will have incurred charges including but not limited to the DVLA fee and other processing costs therefore we believe that it is reasonable to seek to recover some of these costs by making a modest charge to the motorist of no more than £20 for a 14-day period from when the keying error was identified before reverting to the charge amount at the point of appeal. Now, we know that the "modest charge" is unenforceable in law, however, it would be up to the individual if they wanted to pay and make the problem go away or in fact if they wanted to contest the issue in court. If the motorist DOES appeal to the PPC explaining the error and the PPC rejects the appeal and the appeal fails, the motorist can use that in his favour at court.   Defence: "I entered the wrong VRN by mistake Judge, I explained this and I also submitted proof of payment for the relevant parking period in my appeal but the PPC wouldn't accept that"   If the motorist DOES NOT appeal to the PPC in the first instance the judge may well use that as a reason to dismiss the case in the claimant's favour because they may decide that they had the opportunity to resolve the matter at a much earlier stage in the proceedings. It is my humble opinion that a motorist, having paid and having proof of payment but entering the wrong VRN, should make an appeal at the first appeal stage in order to prevent problems at a later stage. In this instance, I think there is nothing to be gained by concealing the identity of the driver, especially if at a later stage, perhaps in court, it is said: “I (the driver) entered the wrong VRN.” Whether you agree or not, it is up to the individual to decide …. but worth thinking about. Any feedback, especially if you can prove to the contrary, gratefully received.
    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • The music streaming service reports record profits of over €1bn (£860m) after laying off 1500 staff.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Date from DCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have received a court date for Robinson Way who are chasing me for a debt from Capital One. I had written to them directly when they first contacted me requesting the CCA. They failed to cokmply with this, despite a second letter, all of which were sent recorded delivery.

 

On receiving the court documents, i filed a partial defence, and have requested information from their solicitors under the civil proceedings rule, they have written back refusing saying they have no need to comply with this request, and that as i have filed a defence the information I am requesting is not covered by the civil procedings rules, and is covered under disclosure. Although they did suggest that I could get the information under the DPA sending £10.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Was it the letter from this site requesting further info?

No you don't have to pay anything as it's now a court matter and you are asking under the CPR.

Some of the helpers will undoubtedly be by later, it may help if you type the particulars of claim on the court document.

It's unusual I have to say for RW to sue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

they are suing for approximately £1500-1600. My concern is that I was infront of a judge not so long ago who said there is already agreement about how much a credit card can charge! anyone know what he was on about?

 

Secondly, I need to know how to get the solicitors to comply with the requests I already made under the CCA, and CPR?

 

If anyone could answer these questions I would be grateful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm... show the letter to the court, with DCA's response. can you post your defence? and their POC?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've sent off your £1 for the CCA and they haven't provided one then

 

"he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;"

 

Which sort of stops things when they get before a Judge....

 

CPR 18 - A formal request for more information about a party’s claims or documents. Asking if they have the executed CCA with your signature is quite reasonable. Pointing out that they will have to provide the CCA at some point but them saying they won't until ordered to by disclosure is just delaying things and adding to costs.

 

Post up the full POC and your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry for the delay inreplying to these posts, but things happened and i need to get a new laptop. Anyway down to buisness.

 

Their claim,

 

"the claimaintclaims outstanding monies due and payable by the defendant under a credit agreement whereby the defendant agreed to repay with interest the value of the credit obtained". The claimed is for 934.09 plus costs.

 

My defence is that I have requested information namely the Credit agreement, which the claimaints have failed to comply with.

 

Any info you could give me would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have just compiled a letter to the court requesting they order the claimaints to comply as follows;

 

Having written to the claimants Solicitors on the 29th January 2008, under the Civil Procedure Rules, in order for me to be able to present to the court an adequate defence this information should have been furnished to me by the 8th February 2008. The claimants replied stating that this information could be obtained using a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act.

Having previously requesting information from the claimants i.e. a copy of the Credit agreement referred to in their claim, and deed of assignment under s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 with the appropriate fee of £1.00 on the 29th May 2007, this request was sent to the claimants by recorded delivery, a proof of delivery being obtained. The claimants failed to reply to any correspondence which included a further letter sent to them on the 6th of August 2007, which directed the claimants to their failure under the Consumer Credit Act to supply the requested information within the timescales laid down within the act of 12 days of supplying the information requested, and after 30 calendar day the company commit an offence.

It is my understanding that under Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act states;

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) - is not entitled, while the default continues to enforce the agreement; and, if the default continues for one month be commits an offence.

I would therefore be grateful for the courts help in obtaining the information I have requested from the Claimants under the Consumer Credit Act and the Civil Procedure Rules in order for me to provide the court with an appropriate defence.

 

Any comments of help with wording would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would cut the first bit short.

 

You wrote on xx May 2007 and xx august 2007 asking for a copy of he CCA under S78 and they failed to provide one.

 

You wrote asking for information under CPR 18 on 29 January 2008 after the comencement of Court proceedings. The claimant has failed to comply.

 

Because of the Claimants lack of dillegence the claimant is aware that the proceedings are now caught by Section 78 (6) of the CCA 2004 and that the claimant is not entitled to enforce the alleged agreement .

 

Because of this I'd ask the Court to consider (under its case mangament powers) making an "unless" order that strikes out the claim unless they comply with your CPR 18 request and supply a copy of the executed Credit Agreement containing the precribed terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have updated the letter, any ideas would be useful

 

Thanks

 

I wrote to the claimants on 27th May 2007 and 6th August 2007 asking for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement under S78 and they failed to provide one.

 

I also wrote asking for information under Civil Proceedings Rule 18 on 29 January 2008 after the commencement of Court proceedings. The claimant has failed to comply.

 

Because of the Claimants lack of diligence the claimant is aware that the proceedings are now caught by Section 78 (6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and that the claimant is not entitled to enforce the alleged agreement.

 

Because of this I ask the Court to consider (under its case management powers) making an "unless" order that strikes out the claim unless the claimants comply with the Civil Proceedings Rule 18 request and supply a copy of the executed Credit Agreement containing the prescribed terms, Notice of assignment with proof of delivery, and a transcript of all transaction including charges, fees, interest, and repayments .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I still have not received a reply from the court, and the hearing is scheduled for the 17th March, The solicitors do not want to play ball nor do the courts by the look of it.

 

Any ideas?:idea: :idea:

 

I have also completed a skeleton defence as follows;

 

  • The defendant does not admit or deny the debt, and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.
     
    2. On 29TH xxxxx 2007 the defendant sent a request under the consumer credit act for a true copy of the executed Credit Agreement, and a statement of account detailing the principal, and all charges and fees made in respect of the debt, the claimant received the request on the 31st xxxxxx 2007 by recorded delivery and the claimant has so far failed to send the defendant the required information.
     
    I would respectfully submit the debt is unenforceable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 until such time as the claimant provides the necessary information.
     
    3. The claimant states the alleged debt was purchased from Capital One. I have not received a notice of assignment for the alleged debt from the original creditor. I therefore put the claimant to strict proof that privity of contract exists between the claimant and Defendant.
     
    4. I have not received a copy of any default notice from the claimant, and ask that the claimant provides the court with a true copy of such a notice, together with proof of postage that this notice was sent to the correct address and was served with the proper notice before this claim was submitted.
     
    5. In addition to asking the court to order the disclosure of the credit agreement, notice of default in the form required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and notice of assignment in the form required by the Law of Property Act 1925, the defendant also requests that the court order the claimant to disclose a list of all charges made to the account and a list of the costs associated with each charge in order for them to prove that the debt amounts to the amount claimed.
     
    6. The defendant respectfully asks the permission of the court to amend this defence when the claimant provides the above documents.

Does this sound good enough, do I need to send copies of the letters I have sent to the claimants?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bracknellboy:

Try not to worry about this court appearance - you are not on trial or anything, its much more informal than that.

All that will happen is that the judge will ask if you admit the debt - if so, that will be that - you'll then go into an office type room and all sit round a table to work out how much you can repay per month.

So its best to have your £1 per month worked out in advance ;)

The whole thing is a total waste of the courts time, your time & the DCA's time quite frankly :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your guns. You've done the right thing by asking them to prove that an enforcable debt exists, and they've manifestly failed to do so. It's not looking good for them, is it?

 

I'd be asking the court to strike the case out, or at least make the "Unless" order referred to above.

 

The absolute worst that can happen is that it gets to court and they pull an agreement out of their hat, in which case you either pick it apart and show it to be unenforcable (any missing prescribed terms, for example) or ask for more time to amend your defence.

 

The text of the Act is well and truly on your side.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just received in the post their case, which has the credit agreement, statements etc in , well how can they do that. I also note that there as payment protection charged on the account. Now what do I do, anyone got any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just looked at the documents they have sent along with the statements supplied, there is over 660.00 in charges on the statement plues payment protection insurance. the total being claimed is £950.

 

Any ideas how to defend this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

What did you file as your defence with the court.

 

when is the hearing and what have they provided as documents they are going to rely upon if this goes to trial

 

 

have you filed an AQ yet? it would either have been a Form N150 or N149

 

i had a read through this thread yesterday and im sorry to say but i struggled to make head nor tail of what was happening at this moment in time

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pt,

 

Ok let me try to explain what has happened. I received letters from a DCA demanding monines from a credit card company, I CCA'd them, enclsoing the appropriate fee, they did not reply, so I sent the default letter. Later I got a summons in the post from their solicitors, I filed a defences stating that I had requested information under the CCA and this had not been forthcoming so was to my understaning unenforceable. I then sent a Civil proceedings letter to their solicitors requesting the information, which they refused saying this would be disclosed prior to the hearing. I then wrote to the court to ask them to enforce my civil proceedings request or strike out the claim due to it being unenforceable.

 

Yesterday, I received a nice little parcel with all of the information that I had requested back in May, but the statements show overlimit fee's of £20.00 and late fee's which total approx £680.00. There is also payment protection insurance on the statements as well. There total claim is £960.00

 

My question what shall i do now? I dont know about forms that have been completed etc, although I do most probably need to amend my defence.

 

Any help with this I would apprecite.

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...