Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No Cashback Redemption with Mobile Outlet


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am writing to request you for acting as a consumer representative to take action on the following company which had failed to honor in making the cashback payment of the mobile phone contract. I had attached the terms and conditions, original dispatch note and 4 emails and the current mobile phone bill

 

The Mobile Outlet

 

Address: Website:

Telephone

(Sales):(Care):

Email

(Sales):(Customer Services): (Cash Back Enquiries):

 

My order number is 2003XXXX and the mobile number of the mobile phone contract is 0797XXXXXXX . I had enter a mobile phone contract with the company on the company website on 23 May 2007

 

Referring the terms and conditions of the contract, as well as the additional literature that relates to this offer, I am entitled to a total cashback payment of £480.00 and this are spread equally to 5 stages claiming process which are £96.00 in month 4, 7, 9, 11 and 12 of the contract.

 

According to the contract, once the company is receipt of the original documentation, the delivery of cheque will be made within 28 days. I received 2 emails on 1 October 2007 which are about the confirmation of receipt of documentation and successful of application, and a cheque will be delivered after 45 days (payment made after 28 days and additional 14 days of delay). But no any cheque was received. I called the company on 25 October 2007 and the company representative confirmed that a cheque will be delivered to my bank account by end of October 2007. But no any transaction made by the company. I send 2 emails to the company email, and received the confirmation of receipt on 12 November 2007. I called again on 19 November 2007, the representative confirmed again that a cheque will be delivered by end of November 2007, but when I further my queries, he ignored my question and hang up my call. Once again, this is in accordance with the terms and conditions. The representative’s response to my call was unsatisfactory.

 

I had forwarded with the original bills 1 through to 4 and original dispatch note on 17 September 2007 which is within 21 days of the issue date on bill number 4 (on 3 September 2007).

 

I had sent a letter on 21 November 2007 with the title of Request for Payment of Cashback and attached the terms and conditions, original dispatch note and 4 emails. I had gave the company 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting the company know a date by which I will receive payment. If the company does not respond, or do not respond positively within this time period, I shall send the company a letter before action giving the company a further 14 days in which to reflect.

 

I had sent another information letter on 12 December 2007 to let the company know the action will be taken and giving a further 14 days in which to reflect. In addition, I had attached an email and original bills 5 through to 7 which regarding the application for cashback of month 7. I did receive an email from the company but this replied email is for my previous enquiry which I sent on 12 November 2007. I am not satisfies with apologize since no any time frame given. I called again after 21 November 2007, but the company contact number is changed and the number is not available to call. And up to now, the call problem still remains the same.

 

I hope that, on consideration of my request, you will be persuaded to take an action to prevent the incident happen again. My contact number is mentioned above. I can be available for interview at any time and look forward to hearing from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Who are they.

My son had the same problem and got some very good advice from members of this forum. If you search on Express mobiles you will find the threads.

He telephoned them every day and eventually threatened them after advic from members with court action on the phone and surprisingly the cheque turned up next day

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the Mobile Outlet is now in Receivership (as of last week). It said there were too many redemptions and that affected their financial stability. They had budgeted for a 40% redemption and got over 85%....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...