Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I only joined last year but I've found this site invaluable. I have been helped with good advice for myself and have been given good advice in order to help other people. :)

 

I think this site deserves some sort of award for the help and support it gives people when they need it.

 

I'm sorry you don't feel the same way or am I missing something?

 

In what direction was the site supose to take? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

SatNav????

 

I still use the tried and tested way of 'Asking Directions' a new invention us 'birds' have not taught to you 'blokes' :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many many years ago....

My Dad was tring to find his way out of a very foggy Blackpool. He needed to head towards Liverpool so he followed a car that had Liverpool stickers all over that back window thinking it would go in that direction. He ended up in a farm yard in the Lake District!! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol well at least he was out of blackpool

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't understand what is wrong with this site. Surely Dave alias Bankfodder could explain or is it just aktives opinion as he suggests? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing wrong with the site or its direction, Wino, or at least nothing that I am aware of, and I think this can be understood to be purely MTAR's personal opinion.

 

(If you start seeing banners for "get a bank loan" or "click here for a credit card", I was wrong in the above sentence! :razz:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read THIS thread, and imagine what was edited from link 10

( wrongly in my opinion)

You will see why this might be the outcome.

 

In fact from memory, i would suggest that whole permalinks have been removed.

 

Im sorry to see anybody go, but if people dont like the reply they might get, they shouldnt comment at all.

 

Its just my opinion of course.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what was edited from post #10, however, I imagine it was expletives or a personal attack. Both are against forum rules.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Whatever was deleted, I've looked at the links, and I still haven't got a clue.

 

If he wants to go, then so be it, everyone knows members can come and go as they please.

 

louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not taking sides.

 

The question was asked why ?

 

I have given my opinion why.

 

Thats all.

  • Haha 1

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post prior to post 10 were presumptious- the reply was that the person making comments was presumptious, arrogant, unhelpful, unsupportive, and If people take a closer look, post 10 is not the only message edited, perhaps this was what has caused some upset?

 

If anyone would like to know, I'm sure if you mail Bigmac Versus you will get a response, as they edited the comments, fair enough, but they were not hurtful comments that would persuade someone to leave, just a bit personal maybe, and maybe I did go overboard, but people want support, prior to the post mentioned, I received the opposite,

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best directions were getting out of Calais but not using the motorway as it was blockaded.... "Follow that bus---- now don't follow that one but follow the other one instead when it comes off the roundabout at the other side..." Took us straight to the hotel we needed!

 

I think the OP thought the site would stick to bank claims only, but there is a lot of very useful allied information here and it is a shame to loose a good poster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they were not hurtful comments that would persuade someone to leave,
Which is why i said unfairly edited. IMO.

 

but people want support, prior to the post mentioned, I received the opposite,

 

Im glad to see you decided to stay, and i hope MTAR comes back soon too.

 

Is there anything you need help with that i can support you on. ?

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...