Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Getting stressed can my CCA help


clowders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5901 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:???: Hi all,

 

Brief history, try to get MBNA to reduce interest and reclaim back charges.

 

I've finally received my CCA from MBNA and would like to know whether it it is valid. I'm am trying to get MBNA to reduce my rate of interest due to financial difficultly. I am not trying to walk away from my debt, but they are making it very difficult for me and my family at the moment with letters and phone calls and i'm trying to gain a bit of power back. Anyway if someone could spare some time to help me with this I would appreciate it very much. CCA on links below.

 

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0001-1.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0001.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0002.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0003.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0004.jpg

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg48/clowders/scan0009.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS badger says, this is just an application form and, as such, is unenforceable by virtue of s59 of the CCA 1974. To be an enforceable agreement it must have, on the same sheet of paper:

 

1) your signature (s61 CCA1974)

2) prescribed terms - your credit limit, APR, how minimum payments are determined (scedule 6 Consumer Credit (Agrement) Regulations 1983)

 

(the terms in 2 are for a credit card - loans have different prescribedterms)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses so far, I am in the process of drafting a letter to send, but I can clarify two things.

 

The prescribed terms - your credit limit, APR, how minimum payments are determined etc, should this be on the actual signed application form or in the small print pages for the CCA to be valid.

 

Also they have £12 for charges on the small print, does anyone know when this came into effect as the application form was signed in 1998 and i thought the £12 was introduced at a later date.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

The prescribed terms have to be on the same sheet as your signature (because you are signing to say you accept them).

 

I don't know when the £12 charge was introduced but I suspect after April last year. THey have sent you recent T&Cs rather than the ones in force when the agreement was signed.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, i'm after some further advice as I'm not quite sure what do to next.

 

I sent a letter to MBNA, mainly borrowed from Alphageek basically stating that I have only received a copy of my application form (links in above post) and not the CCA. That the account was now in dispute and I will make no further payments until I receive the CCA.

 

I also stated that they have not complied with my SAR request which was set on 26th November 2007.

 

I have received the following letter from them and I need some help responding.

 

Dear Clowders,

 

Thank you for your recent letter, the contents of which have been noted.

 

We disagree that MBNA has not sent you what you have asked for, in fact we are confident that MBNA has provided you with all the necessary information which is required by law. we have set you a true copy of your agreement containing all necessary material terms and conditions. This is what we have to send you.

 

we would like confirm that MBNA does not regard this account balance or your obligation to repay as being in dispute, and would like to point out and clairfy that your credit agreement is valid and your abligation to repay is remains intact. We would also like to confirm whislt your account remains in arrears, your account will continue to register negaive information at the credit reference agencies.

 

As stipulated in your terms and conditions we may, when an account falls into arrears use external collection agencies to collect the debt. In addiion, there may come a time in the future when, if you have failed to make proper repayments against the credit card, MBNA may sell/assign the debt to a third pary.

 

We have considered the other points whch you have raised in your letter and can confirm there are no further documents we are required to provide you with, to confirm that you have entered into and owe money under a valid and enforceable credit card agreement.

 

Please note no further correspondence will be entered into regarding this matter.

 

yours sincerely

 

Rachael Hopely

 

Customer Assistance Manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try something along the lines of

Thank you for your letter of DATE which I duly note.

 

Although you may have complied with your obligations undert s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 as amended by the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983, what you have sent me is not a copy of an executable agreement.

 

Under s172 of the Act, since what you have sent me is in response to a request under s78(1), you are bound by your reply and I will seek an order to that effect should the case come to court.

 

Further, since the documents you have sent do not contain the terms prescribed under Schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 and is thereby improperly executed, I will cite s127(3) of the Act in defence of any request by you for a court to enforce the agreement under s65(1) of the Act.

If you want to look up the sections quoted, you can find the whole Act here

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clowders

 

Just wanted to add some support.

 

I dealt with MBNA for OH and they were a pain in the proverbial but we got there in the end - just don't give up.

 

I would also send a seperate letter re non compliance with the SAR. Are you sending off for this to reclaim charges?

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steven, Will read through Act and then get a letter drafted.

 

 

Thanks for the support Hopeful, Yes I'm trying to claim my charges back as this will substantially reduce the amount I owe.

 

Initally all i wanted was the interest reduced, so I could honour my commitments then they start applying even more charges and completely ignoring my letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

MBNA have now gone from pretty pink envelopes with 'we care' letters to hard line letters stating that they will no longer discuss the fact I am stating my CCA is unenforceable.

 

They have also stated that they will not discuss the matter of my CCA being unenforceable any further and refuse to correspond on the subject.

 

This is making me very concerned that the CCA is infact valid as I have not seen MBNA take this stance on any other post.

 

Steven or anyone else out there, have you come across this before? is it scare tactics or do you think it the CCA could infact be valid.....?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had another look at what you posted in post 1. What you have is:

 

scan1-1 is an application form. As a CC Agreement it is void under s59 of the Act

scan1 is part of standard T&Cs. It has two out of the 3 prescribed terms but they could belong to any agreement as it doesn't have your signature

scan2, scan3, scan4 and scan9 are all bits of the same T&Cs

 

What they have sent is completely unenforceable - it has your signature, name and address but not theirs, it doesn't have the prescribed terms ( that is, terms prescribed under schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983) and it doesn't have a statement about your right to cancel.

 

If they should take you to court, a court would not be able to issue an enforcement order by virtue of s127 of the Act. It is signed before April 2007 when the rules changed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...