Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CL Finance Claimform - Old HSBC Managed Loan **WON CASE STRUCK OUT**


master woody
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Mine is due by the 31st but as yet not enough paperwork to do a full defence either.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok Time for my defence I’ve had a go at making one my self from other posts. Any guidance would be much appreciated, I need to get my defence in by Thursday but planning on doing it on Wednesday, due to family commitments.

One of the things I’d like to ask is why have CL not used the Loan reference? They have used my bank account and sort code, is this OK? The referenced account has a 3.5K negative balance and HSBC has sold it to another DCA,

its Currently stayed (OFT) as I’m claiming 3.2K bank charges back! Is this relevant?

I’m currently paying £15X pounds a moth through payplan to this debt

Thanks for your support and help

 

 

IN THE XXXXXXXX COUNTY COURT CLAIM NUMBER XXXXXXXX

BETWEEN:

CL FINANCE LIMITED

Claimant

And

Woody

Defendant

 

DEFENCE

 

 

1. On 7 January 2008 CL FINANCE LIMITED commenced proceedings against the defendant for £XXXX plus interest, a debt allegedly incurred under a credit agreement between the defendant and HSBC Bank PLC 2. The Claimant states the debt was assigned them by a deed of assignment dated 28 September 2007.

3. The defendant does not admit or deny the debt, but puts the claimant to strict proof thereof.

4. The defendant has not received a valid notice of assignment for the alleged debt from the original creditor and therefore put the claimant to strict proof that privity of contract exists between the claimant and Defendant.

6. The claimant’s solicitors were requested by letter dated 17 January 2008 to produce the following various documents under Part 18.1 of the Civil Procedure Rules viz., a copy of the executed credit agreement, a true copy of the alleged assignment and any default notice from the original creditor together with some form of proof of postage that this notice was sent to the correct address and was served with the proper notice before this claim was submitted.

7. To date, the claimant’s solicitors have not acknowledged the request, nor responded in any way nor supplied the requested documentation.

8. The defendant has not received a copy of any default notice from the claimant, and asks that the claimant provides the court with a true copy of such a notice, and with some form of proof of postage that this notice was sent to the correct address and was served with the proper notice before this claim was submitted.

AND the defendant

9. seeks an order that the claimant’s action is struck out or otherwise is dismissed on the grounds that any claim cannot be enforced following the claimant’s default in failing to supply a true copy of the executed credit agreement as required by S78 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

10. In the alternative, the defendant respectfully asks the court to order the disclosure of the credit agreement, notice of default in the form required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and notice of assignment in the form required by the Law of Property Act 1925. The defendant also requests that the court order the claimant to disclose a list of all charges made to the account and a list of the costs associated with each charge for the last 6 years in order for them to prove that the debt amounts to the amount claimed.

11. The defendant also respectfully asks the permission of the court to amend this defence when the above documents are provided by the claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Starting to worry now, only one day left and rereading my defence I have very little knowledge, even if this is the right stage to summit my full defence?

Definitely starting to lose the plot a bit

Do you have a set amount of charters on money claim web site , I remember this from my bank claim days…will my defence fit?

Any help or pointer to threads most welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woody, looks good for the moment.

You have put the ball firmly in CL's hands and they either comply or risk having the claim struck out.

After all without the agreement they are relying on there is NO case to answer.

  • Haha 1

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woody I think your defence is fine. I have sent a letter to the court saying I can't submit a defence as they haven't sent me the information I requested, but wish I had done something like your defence instead. I think you should go with it.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I’ve had a reply from CL saying we don’t have to give you any information the information in the claim should be enough to file a defence.

All they have sent is the paper work from HSBC regarding the sale of the debt to them (with the incorrect account number).

No Statements

No copy of the Consumer credit agreement

No list of changes ect

No complaints procedure

No deeds of assignments

I’d like to send the court a complaints letter. Saying CL are try to frustrate my defence. ( I remember seeing a template for this, anyone got it to hand?)

Any thoughts…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woody I couldn't find anything when I needed to tell the court that they had not supplied the information for me to supply a full defence. In the end I just sent a brief note to the court telling them so. You could do the same and enclose a copy of the letter they sent saying they are not obliged to give you any information.

 

Incidentally I do think that your charges claim is highly relevant if you have not brought that into the proceedings yet. Hopefully someone will come along and point you in the direction of the letter - I know I have seen it somewhere too:confused:

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just to give you some support, I also am dealing with this lot for a second time

 

Last year their claim was succesfully struck out, when they didn't submit any documents and didn't turn up in court

 

I am now dealing with another claim of their's for my wife and have recieved the same response as you so far, saying they are not obliged to supply documents under CPR rules

 

I have done the defence accordingly

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I have done the defence accordingly

 

Do you mean, the same defence as mine? I think i have a very strong case as they have used the incorrect account number ie they have used my current account not the loan account number.

 

could you please tell me what happens next? Am I waiting for court papers or a court date or some directions from the court...

 

Storm are you still paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/108467-basic-introduction-consumer-credit.html

 

Its answered my questions!!! top thread a must read for all in my boat!

 

CAG helps agian, defo going to give CAG a donation when i can afford it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, Just had a phone call from Cohen.

Their now receiving payments from my DMP and look like there backing down.

Conversation when like this:

HC “would You consent to us stopping action as you have defended”

Woody ” you’re the ones taking me to court if you wish to stop that’s up to you but I will as, I have also done continue to make payments.”

HC “so will you consent? “

Woody “consent to what?”

HC “To us stopping any further legal action”

Woody “Ye Ok you send me what you want me to sign and I’ll take a look”

HC “Ok Thanks Mr woody bye bye”

BTW she was a really nice

Has anyone got any comments……

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had a reply from CL saying we don’t have to give you any information the information in the claim should be enough to file a defence.

 

All they have sent is the paper work from HSBC regarding the sale of the debt to them (with the incorrect account number).

 

No Statements

No copy of the Consumer credit agreement

No list of changes ect

No complaints procedure

No deeds of assignments

 

I’d like to send the court a complaints letter. Saying CL are try to frustrate my defence. ( I remember seeing a template for this, anyone got it to hand?)

 

Any thoughts…

 

I requested information under the CPR rules & today I have received a similar response from CL saying-

 

We have been in contact with our solicitors HC who have advised that we are not obligded to provide this information and would advise that the particulars of claim detailed om the cc form should be sufficent to allow you to respond accordingly.

 

Having said that we have been in contact with opur predecessors GE money & have been able to obtain certain information which is enclosed herewith.

 

They have sent a copy of the credit agreement CC act 1974 page 1 of 3

Which is signed by me, however no date against my signature,

A signature for GE money which you can't tell whose signed and again no date.

 

A copy of the deed of assignment 5 pages dated on the front the 16th May 2007 a scribbled signature on the back. This is the first time I have ever seen one of these...

Also a set of copy statements ranging from Mar 02 to May 07 however not complete as there are some statements missing...

 

How would you proceed from here as CL have not complied fully with my request under CPR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha - missing statements - they have failed to provide a mere 26 months worth of statements for our account:o. Seems they had a computer cock up. I think you need to post up the alleged agreement for the experts to look at.

 

On our case I sent the court a letter saying GE had not complied with our CPR request as the aforementioned statements were missing. We have had an order from the court today saying that we have to do our best at submitting a defence in spite of the missing information.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks goldlady

 

Sorry to burst in on someone else thread but if you look at my post cohen & my property it will give you some background to my case...

 

however I haven't paid anyone & didn't pay on the court order as I didn't believe that CL muppets have any claim to the debt... obviously I now know different ....although I am going to get slapped I am not taking the first slap easily..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve got my letter from Cohen:

 

They want me to sign a document Called a “Consent order” the deal is I Keep paying them at XXXX a month. I'm not sure what this is ....co

 

 

In their letter they state:

 

A Consent Order is an agreement WITHOUT a County court Judgment being made between the Claimant and Yourself, therefore, there will be no public information registered against you upon the county court judgment register in respect of this claim”

 

The consent Isn’t a court document. Looks like something knocked up in word. They want be to sign three copies of this:

 

In the court of XXXXXXX

Claim number

Between CL finance Claimant

And Woody Defendant

 

It states By consent:

 

  • the parties having agreed terms of statement the schedule attached hereto, all further proceedings in this action by stayed save for the purpose of carrying into effect the terms in schedule hereto

  • there be no order as to costs

 

  • Liberty to apply

Schedule

 

The defendat do pay the claimant the sum of £XXXX.XX per month by instalments of £xxx.xx commencing one month from the date of this order

 

Signed: Claimment

 

Signed: Dedendent

 

Date: xx February 2008

 

 

 

Not sure what to do, do you think I should sign. I always had full intention of paying all my debts in full. And this looks like a return to the status quo

 

What are the implications of me signing this??? willing to fight on put would like some advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would not sign this - they have not got a leg to stand on - I would take it all the way - I have won three times with these and you can do the same - why commit to this when it is them that have not got the information required - if you refuse they have to provide the info for it to go to court and they cannot therefore it will be struck out and your monthly payment will be in your pocket not theirs

 

Good luck:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...