Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sacked 4 Yrs Ago-should I Have Had Legal Help/offer From Union?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I certainly agree with union representation, and believe it should be a right of ALL employees if they wish it. On the whole my experience of unions has been good, but at the time of my problems, I felt employment law at that time had been tilted in favour of employers.

 

But nobody seems to be disputing the fact employees should be represented.

 

Your experience has been good, mine bad. No great surprise here-it happens.

 

My point is that I would prefer to ask somebody who has expert knowledge of employment matters, a lawyer, rather than asking a postman, as my last union was the CWU.

 

It's a no brainer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...Again, why would I want to ask an opinion of a postman (CWU) about an employment matter when I could get expert legal advice for free?:confused:
Any solicitor who was any good would be a Barrister, who would then prefer to be a Judge no doubt.

Not ALL solicitors know their stuff!

...Just think about the zillions of person litigants who have faced 'professionals' in court re: Bank Penalty Charges + WON!!!...;)

Please DON'T judge a person by their occupation!...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

But nobody seems to be disputing the fact employees should be represented.

 

Your experience has been good, mine bad. No great surprise here-it happens.

 

My point is that I would prefer to ask somebody who has expert knowledge of employment matters, a lawyer, rather than asking a postman, as my last union was the CWU.

 

It's a no brainer.

 

I must admit that my gut reaction is the same. Some years ago I was bullied at work by my boss to the extent that I was signed off with occupational stress for 3 months, and I didn't get paid, but I couldn't face going back. IMO it was constructive dismissal and I found my union made no difference to the situation at all.

 

I couldn't face the thought of carrying on the fight at tribunal. I spoke to an employment lawyer sometime later (maybe 3 or 4 years) and it was too late for me to take action. Ironically my ex-boss was sacked a few years later for bullying, as it seems I was the first of her many victims.

 

I feel the union were ineffective, and that the company let me down too, but my rep took lots of advice from more qualified people in her genuine effort to help me. I've moved on now, and no-one will ever bully me again. I gained a lot of strength from that experience, but I'm sure had I gone to a tribunal in time I'd have won a lot of money. I've just moved on, and I think you should do the same.

 

Please note the remarks in red. I have said that my experience was not good on that occasion. This was UNISON, and while I could afford union subs, I couldn't afford an employment lawyer when my pay was being withheld. I was pleased that the rep tried her best for me. She worked for the same company and in the same kind of environment as me so had a good understanding of my situation. She (and I) had the training and resources of the biggest union in the country at our disposal.

 

Some you win, some you lose as we well know on CAG. We fight to improve things for consumers, and are not experts, but at least we can all support each other in a similar way to unions. We don't ask people their jobs before deciding whether their advice is good or not. We just look at the advice freely on offer, postman or lawyer.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to hear of your personal experiences, mine were the total opposite. After I had an accident in the factory I was working in I was being harassed and bullied by a senior manager who was phoneing me everyday asking when I was coming back to work and threatening to stop my pay. He didnt once ask how I was!!

 

We didnt have a Rep on our shift so the warehouse Rep got involved and to cut a long story short he sorted out all the problems I was having and helped me make my claim because as it was proved the company were negligent. After that I was so grateful for the help I received that I became the Union Rep for my shift (elected unopposed) and although I left school at 15 with no qualifications instead of 16 no one could ever acuse me (or indeed ever has) of being useless, except a couple of employers who wanted to get rid of me for my Union work! I went through a whole programme of training and education, including legal with the Union and although not now in that workplace continue as a Union Rep having helped hundreds of people over the years.

 

Unions are not perfect and most employers I have dealt with are far from perfect, hence this forum and the existence of Trade Unions themselves.

 

You have to remember that without the Unions there would be no minimum wage or minimum holiday entitlement or health and safety legislation etc etc. Infact if we had never had any Unions we would all probably still be forced to work 16 hour days, 6 days a week for next to nothing and be lucky if we got paid in cash rather than goods.

 

Whilst your personal experiences may be bad, I don't believe they are common.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in unions and workers rights.

 

However, when I had a problem the union, more so the union reps, were usleless and advised me incorrectly.

 

So much so that my eventual ET was dismissed (as out of time) simply due to the wrong advice I was given but, alas, the ET also dismissed the fact that I was incorrectly advised by the union as they said I could/should have received expert advice considering what I was complaining of!

 

I had done but the damage had already been done.

 

Therefore, I would always suggest getting expert advice rather than relying on laymen where, it transpired, they had had absolutely no employment law training whatsoever.

 

It's like having a pool attendant who cannot swim!

 

It's a scandal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...It's like having a pool attendant who cannot swim!

 

It's a scandal.

FWIW Pool Attendants do NOT have to be able to swim...;)

 

The vast majority of swimming pools in the UK have a depth of less than 6ft + overall dimensions of less than 25m X 50m.

There are also various flotation devices + long poles to hand, which should be used in the event of an emergency.

 

It is extremely dangerous to approach someone who is struggling to keep afloat.

It has been known for them to grab hold of their would be rescuer + cause them to also struggle to keep themselves afloat as the potential rescue develops into a desperate melee.

 

Unions have fought hard + long to get employers to acknowledge their Health & Safety obligations to their workforce + to end blatant discrimination.

...U seem to condone their abusive total disregard of these matters by suggesting that a Pool Attendant SHOULD place themselves in a position of danger as a matter of course + for it to be a precondition of their employment??...:confused:

...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I wouldn't mind being represented by a fellow postal worker if I was employed in that industry. I've had some cr*p jobs in my time and all the Union Rep's I have come across from different Union's have been genuine in their desire to help their colleagues.

 

Lets not forget that Alan Johnson was a postie in Slough and is now not only a member of Parliament but a Government minister.

 

Don't knock people in lower paid jobs or with lack of qualifications until you have been there yourself.

 

I have nothing but respect for people prepared to scratch a living by any means they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd like to know which solicitors are good for suing unions too

 

loads of stuff on my web site about union problems

John at employees dot org dot uk

 

I'm no expert but think most unions only have an implied contract and a very vague little rule book to say what you should expect for your money. Even if the rep is great, the central office can still let you down and get away with it. One person did manage to sue for her subscriptions back, taking the NUJ to court , but she had started working for the court service after leaving teaching and was confident enough to take the case herself. She also had a bit of legal insurance thrown in with her home contents that she had used to win a case against the employer, so it was easier for her to show the court how useless the union had been.

 

I guess a four-years-ex-union would say that they had shredded the records and anyway that you had a weak case. Just a guess.

 

I had an experience like Wierd el Yankvitc's, above. The union lawyer had clearly not been to a tribunal for a long time and had no intention of reading any papers. He was just funded enough to talk to a member for an hour and settle with the other side. Because of union delays I went over my three month time limit and lost nearly all my case.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

PS to save going to my website, this is the link to Sherry v NUT from the Coventry News & Star newspaper. It wasn't an appeal case and didn't get logged on the official web sites. Oh and a photo.

 

Sherry v NUT 2006215112614303.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this not just a Union bashing website?

 

It's easy to highlight a few disgruntled ex Union members but it should be remembered that most of these people have been treated far worse by their former employers and are often looking for a scapegoat.

 

Unions are not perfect but who is?

 

There are 2 sides to every story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They needn't be perfect, but the paid-for part of the service should usually be as good as the employer's legal insurance and human resources advice. And there should be a clear contract. I don't think that's much to ask.

 

When a union pays next to nothing from its legal budget on employment law their typical, average service isn't going to be as good as what the employer gets off a legal insurance scheme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unions have very little power nowadays that was done away with when Maggie was in power.

 

It was mentioned that people should get insurance for free advice included in there household insurance, this is good advice. Regarding no win cases, I was under the impression that would be an insurance based as well, as if you loose therefore you would be responsible for the other side costs and that is where the insurance come in. I could be wrong but I am sure some will let me know if this is the case.

 

Best thing to do when in a union is to asked them for a professional opinion your case as they will have to look at it and give you an answer. Also it is wise to make a written record of dates and times when anything untoward happens in the work place as you are bound to forget it after the event so as soon as possible make a record. Also look at your contract and if there is a staff hand book get a copy of that as well.:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any solicitor who was any good would be a Barrister, who would then prefer to be a Judge no doubt. I don't get this. 'Any solicitor who was any good' would surley be a solicitor who was good!? Not all solicitors wish to advance to a barrister or judge.

 

Not ALL solicitors know their stuff! I disagree. Any employment solicitor I have had business with has specialised in employment law and have been quite competent.

...Just think about the zillions of person litigants who have faced 'professionals' in court re: Bank Penalty Charges + WON!!!...;) Hardly 'zillions!' In fact, I gather only one person has challenged this issue in court and he lost. He also happened to be a barrister!! (Is there not a test case underway!!??)

 

Please DON'T judge a person by their occupation!...:) I haven't. A postman is good at posting letters. I have stated that a postman is not an employment law expert.

Would I ask a postman to diagnose any medical condition I may have? No, I would see a doctor.

...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Craigten

Does anyone have contact details of any no win-no fee solicitors that might specialise in these sort of matters?

What would anyone recommend is my first course of action as regards to the Union? Shall i send them a letter?

 

About the first course of action: it's cheap to ask the union if they have any organised files about you. The data protection commissioner's advice about how to phrase the letter is here

http://tinyurl.com/2yyqlxand once you have their response, you have something to take to a solicitor - maybe one who specialises in professional negligence. The same links on my web site work for professional negligence lawyers as much as for employment lawyers. Scroll down to the bit that says "

To find an employment lawyer near your post code

 

I wrote earlier that the union might say the case was weak, they have lost the evidence etc but maybe you can claim that they should at least have done some work assessing how strong your case was and given you the option to check with a proper lawyer - one who is a law society member.

I dunno. Would be very interested to hear if you have any luck

John at employees dot org dot uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...