Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Imminent Security Threat - Capital 1 Card Holders


revolting peasant
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've had a call tonight from the fraud department at Capital One.

 

They have identified repeated attempted use of counterfeit Capital One credit cards in ATMs in Thailand over the last 12 hours or so.

 

I have confirmed that the call is genuine by refusing to confirm any details with them and then calling them back. My account has now been suspended for my own security.

 

If you have a Capital One card and recieve a call telling you that they need to suspend your account I would suggest that you do the same and don't confirm any "security" details but call them back so you are sure that it is them you are speaking to. The call I had was definitely genuine. I know this because I called them back on two different numbers - the one they gave me and the one on my statement and I got the same story.

 

Admin - please feel free to move this to somewhere more appropriate but where it will be seen

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi RP,

thanks for the info, and just to second what you're saying, DONT GIVE ANY INFO OVER THE PHONE. IF ITS GENUINE THEN THEY'LL GIVE YOU THE SAME ANSWER WHEN YOU PHONE THEM BACK ON THE NUMBER THAT YOU KNOW TO BE GENUINE. dont accept the number that they give you, but do as RP did and ring them on the number THAT YOU ARE SURE OF.

 

 

Cheers RP.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a problem, I NEVER accept to discuss my account -any account- with people who phone me, as I always hold that they could be anyone and if THEY're phoning ME at my home, I expect them to know who I am. (Besides, most of the time, it's either to chase up a bill or to try and sell me something, and I don't see the benefit in making life easy for these people :razz:) Annoys the hell out of them. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I genuinely received a call from Nat West security whilst in Thailand recently.

They didnt ask any personal details, but explained that fraud in severe there, so would i confirm use of my card.

All they wanted me to do was confirm my location.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't been in 5 long years, but the rule of thumb then was - don't let your credit card out of sight.

 

I realise that we're dealing with a totally different issue, but the Thai's are sods for this. As beautiful a race they truely are, as a poorer country, they seem to leave thier normally good values at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't been in 5 long years, but the rule of thumb then was - don't let your credit card out of sight..

 

Im going back for the whole of May...Yipppeeeeee

 

We also had £535 cash stolen from our safety deposit box in the hotel.

So watch your cash to.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lucky sod! I lost my safe deposit key once, and the Thai police/locksmiths were on thier way. In my panic I went for a nervous number two, and there it was, stashed behind the door!

 

(I then flew to Bangkok armed with 600 Baht, my mates were non too pleased!)

 

Apologies OP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

bw - my point is this is a genuine threat. I agree with what you are saying about not confirming details but if you have a C1 card check this one out
I perfectly understand what you say, my point was that if you refuse to confirm your details to a perfect stranger on the phone at all times, you can't get caught, whether the threat is genuine or not.

 

Don't EVER confirm your security details to someone who phones you, you never know who's at the other end. Simple as that. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going back for the whole of May...Yipppeeeeee

 

We also had £535 cash stolen from our safety deposit box in the hotel.

So watch your cash to.

 

 

I've never been to Thailand. If you take me with you Tontcee I'll guard your cash and cards for you:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a security message pop up from Halifax this morning when i used my debit card on the internet,looks like things are really tightening up, i could not proceed until i registered with them

 

Dear MrSETMEFREE

 

You have successfully registered your Halifax card for Halifax Secure. As part of the global Verified by Visa programme, Halifax Secure helps prevent fraudulent use of your card from online stores by offering you password protection on transactions with all member stores.

 

When you enrolled you chose a password, which you will need to use when you make purchases with any merchants who participate in the scheme. By doing this you are protecting yourself and your Halifax card against Online Fraud.

 

What you need to do now

 

All the information you need to set up and use your card with Halifax Secure can be found on our website by clicking on this link Frequently Asked Questions.

 

When you registered, you will have received a pre-assigned log-in name, which is MR SETMEFREE You should now personalise your account to make your log-in name more memorable by visiting Frequently Asked Questions and clicking on Update Visa Details on the left-hand side. You will be required to supply a 'personal message' (a memorable word or phrase) as an additional security measure.

 

Your 'personal message' will be displayed to you whenever you make a Halifax Secure purchase. Whenever you see this 'personal message' displayed as you are about to make a transaction, you can be sure that you are connected directly to Halifax and that your transaction is secure. You can then proceed with confidence in making your online purchase.

 

If you have any questions regarding the scheme or which merchants are members then you can visit our website on Frequently Asked Questions, which will answer any queries you have.

 

This is an outbound only message, any queries sent to this email address cannot be answered.

 

Kind regards,

Halifax Secure

 

Activation Details:

Activation date: 19/12/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...