Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next Directory and Blank CCA


cheddar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well i am ignoring studio cards demand for money and have made a formal complaint to TS and the OFT.

 

I am currently preparing my file for the FSO but before that i am making a F+F offer advising them this is the most they will get out of me and if they dont take the offer they will be have a complaint filed against them with the FSO.

 

They wont want the charge as it is more than i actually owe them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Well my neighbour came round the other day and mentioned that Cabot have been writing to her regarding this which she was amazed at. I asked her to bring over the paperwork and currently have a load of threatograms from the past 2-3 weeks. She sent them the embarrassed letter like I told her to 2 years ago to another DCA and they have come back saying we have been in touch with Next and here's your valid CCA - black application form and terms again, no date or anyones signature anywhere. Reading back on Next's replies they really are amazing saying that the ICO agree with them about not even needing a signature to enforce a debt etc

 

She actually brought a few letters from 2008 from DCA's Debt Managers Ltd, Russel & Aitken Solicitors as usual mainly threatening court but also offering 25% discounts etc, pretty much proof they know they don't have a leg to stand on. She says no one has rang or come round fortunately.

 

Next move for her? I am suggesting something along the lines of telling Cabot and Next they are breaking collection guidelines and complaining to the OFT etc?

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scott, can anyone advise my neighbours next move? I had dealings with Next and with Cabot but they went quiet, seeing as 3 different DCAs have popped up in as many weeks for me and Cabot again for my neighbour it wouldn't surprise me if I start getting ones about my old account as well! Why do they all seem to act at the same time? I've had nothing for ages! Anyway blank CCA so is the next step to send a letter, ignore or make a complaint to the OFT, TS etc?

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I printed out a letter giving Next/Crapbot another 21 days as they haven't complied with the CCA and gave it to my neighbour who sent it the same day via recorded. I have told her not to worry on this as they obviously don't have a leg to stand on. I've done the same for myself as Next/Cabot have started on me as well and did the same to me many years ago!! SO I just sent the 21 day later right away. Let's see what they come up with ;)

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so they have ignored my neighbour for now but have sent me the following, can anyone advise?

 

"....you have received our response to your request under section 78 of the CCA 1974. However you state that your agreement is unenforceable as it does not conform to section 60(1) and 61(1) of the CCA.

 

The information that Cabot have provided (a blank Next CCA with no signatures on it at all) in response to your request satisfies the definition of a 'true copy' in that we have provided a reconstituted copy of your credit agreement and accompanying T&C's. The definition of a true copy as prescribed in regulation 3 of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 states what information can be omitted therein. Furthermore case law shows that a 'true copy' does not mean an exact copy.

 

We would also like to highlight that the sole purpose of the CCA is for consumer protection, not to provide a method for the avoidance of debt, which we believe you are attempting in this matter."

 

They then go on to threaten me saying I have to ring or they will escalate this blah blah blah. I assume this is their usual stance? Ignore from here? This has been rumbling on now for over 3 years for around £150 which is now nearer to £200 when they slapped charges on. I doubt they will be taking me to court lol

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...