Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
    • Anotheruser0000 bear in mind that not all Judges are equally versed in the PoFA regulations. Fortunately now most of them are but sometimes a Judge from a higher Court sits in who is well experienced  in Law but not PoFA. and so they sometimes go "offkey" because their knowledge can raise a different set of arguments and solutions. It does seem particularly unfair  when the decision is so  bad . it can also be that in some situations the motorist being a lay person is not sufficiently know ledgeable to be able to counter a Judge's decisions in a way that a barrister could.
    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Do I have any claim to the job?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5981 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All

 

Hope you can help me with some advice. I took over someone's substantive post in November 2005 whilst they went on Secondment. Initially my contract was for until March 2006. It was then extended until March 2007 and then again until March 2008. Do I have have any claim on the job as I have been in post over 2 years. I have been told my contract will end in March 2008 or if the substantive post holder wishes to return. However based on past experience the contract may be extended again but it is not a very nice position to be in.

 

Can anyone help

Many Thanks

Chesham35

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly the employer may keep you on fixed term contracts for 4 years before he has to justify why your employment status cannot be deemed 'permanent'. You will therefore have to hope that you are offered a further extension until the end of 2009 at which point you are entitled to receive 'permanent' staff status or a statement from the employer as to why your employment should remain 'fixed term'.

 

You should however be receiving exactly the same treatment at work with regard to pension, pay and benefits (and redundancy in certain circumstances) as a permanent employee in the same role for as long as your employment lasts.

 

You say that your contract will end in March 2008 or if the substantive post holder returns - is it stated that you have employment until March 2008, until the post holder returns, or both? If you have a contract until March 2008 and the post holder returns early so you are forced to leave, then that would constitute a breach of contract, unless you have agreed to a condition where you will leave before the end of the term.

  • Haha 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sidewinder

Thank-you for the response. I did think that may be the case about 4 years but wasn't sure. I do get exactly the same treatment so that's not a problem.

The last letter I received says That my contract has been extended until March 2008 or until the substantive postholder wishes to return. So looks like they've covered their bases and I would get the standard 4 weeks notice.

Many Thanks for your help

Chesham5

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope for your sake that the other person decides not to return to work - it sounds as if you have a job which you don't mind doing, which is a rare thing!

 

All the best and fingers crossed.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Hope you don't mind me coming in on this, but I did a lot of research into this for a friend not so long back. Regluations for fixed term contracts changed in 2002. Under the Fixed Term Contract Regulations (prevention of less favourable Treatment) 2002, it i now unlawful for a fixed term contract to just come to an end. Where a contract is not renewed it is automatically classed as dismissal. There must be a legal reason for this dismissal. This also means that you would have the standard dimissal rights, such as the required notice, a statement of reasons for dismissal, and the right not to be unfairly dismissed. You would also have the right to appeaL. If you have been employed by the same company for over two years you also have full redundancy rights, including redundancy pay, and the right to be offerred alternative suitable employment where it exists. This is regardless of whether you have a fixed term contract or a permanent one.

 

You would have to look into the stake on your job, as it was to cover someone else, but in the worst instance you do have redundancy rights.

 

Please look at the Direct.gov.uk website and look into fixed term contracts. Also look at the ACAS website on the fixed term work section. All the above info is on there. You could speak to an adviser there about your situation, who can let you know where you stand.

 

Hope this helps,

Jo

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jo

That does help thank-you. I will definitely look at Direct.gov.uk and ACAS. It is good to know that if my contract is ended I may be able to do something about it. Looks like I'll be doing a bit more research into this afterall knowledge is power!!

Appreciate your comments

Many Thanks

Chesham5

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Hope you don't mind me coming in on this, but I did a lot of research into this for a friend not so long back. Regluations for fixed term contracts changed in 2002. Under the Fixed Term Contract Regulations (prevention of less favourable Treatment) 2002, it i now unlawful for a fixed term contract to just come to an end.

 

Not quite sure about that as the fixed term contract is still perfectly lawful providing that it gives the employee the opportunity to request an extension or to apply for a permanent position within the organisation - the 2002 Regulations merely ensured the equal treatment of fixed term workers compared to permanent employees. The salary and benefits package must for example be equal to or greater than that of a comparable member of permanent staff, and there must be an equality in terms of emloyment opportunity, progression and length of service considerations. Where the employee makes a formal request to extend the contract or to be given a permanent position, the fixed term may still lawfully come to an end providing that the employee receives a decision and statement of reasons within 21 days of making the request.

 

Where a contract is not renewed it is automatically classed as dismissal. There must be a legal reason for this dismissal. This also means that you would have the standard dimissal rights, such as the required notice, a statement of reasons for dismissal, and the right not to be unfairly dismissed. You would also have the right to appeaL.

 

Correct - in the same way that retirement (where the company is unwilling to accept an extension to a contract) is dismissal on the grounds of Retirement, this would be dismissal on the grounds of a fixed term contract expiring. There would indeed be the requirement to provide adequate notice of the contract not being extended and a right to appeal. Providing that the employer provides objective reasons for not extending the contract though, this would be a fair dismissal.

 

If you have been employed by the same company for over two years you also have full redundancy rights, including redundancy pay, and the right to be offerred alternative suitable employment where it exists. This is regardless of whether you have a fixed term contract or a permanent one.

You would have to look into the stake on your job, as it was to cover someone else, but in the worst instance you do have redundancy rights.

 

Again true, but the right to redundancy pay would only be effected if the dismissal was due to redundancy not dismissal due to the fixed term expiring. The OP could not walk out of the job at the end of March 2008 and expect redundancy pay as well as any other severence unless she was told that her position was being made redundant. If she were no longer required as the original post holder was returning then there is no redundancy entitlement. The OP would be entitled to be considered as an equal in the event of applying for any other suitable vacant position alongside permanent employees. If the company were to find it neccessary to make redundancies for economic or other reasons however, the fixed term employee cannot be selected solely for the reason that she is on a fixed term contract - she would have to enter a pool of possible staff and be assessed in accordance with the criteria applicable to other staff.

 

Please look at the Direct.gov.uk website and look into fixed term contracts. Also look at the ACAS website on the fixed term work section. All the above info is on there. You could speak to an adviser there about your situation, who can let you know where you stand.

 

Good advice - ACAS are an invaluable source of free help.

 

Hope this helps,

Jo

 

Sorry - just clarifying a few points

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I also have advice?

I to have worked for more than 6 years doing another job with my T&C'S staying the same as the day I started, my employer wants to drop my pay and T&C'S by 10k, I do have a letter stateing the job change 6 years ago and I do have proof of the job I have been doing for the last 6 years, can they just change my job when it suits?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying that you have been doing a different job to the one you did originally, but that you have been kept on your original T&Cs? I take it that this is not a 'fixed term' issue?

 

We could do with a few more details, but in essence, and if I have understood correctly then - No, you are entitled to believe that your current duties, pay and conditions are your regular terms - implied contract terms as the result of Custom and Practice. Consequently if they are trying to revert your role to your original one of 6 years ago with a resultant drop in salary, hours, benefits or any other material change then this must be negotiated and cannot be amended without your agreement.

 

It may be worth starting a new thread and copy your post above to it in order for more people to offer advice.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the original point I have to agree with Jomc here. You have full employment rights. Employers cannot keep extending fixed term contracts or if they do its makes no differance as you are now a permanent employee.

 

In reply to Toutvent, you haven't had a pay rise for 6 years??!!

 

No they can't unless you agree and who is going to agree to a pay cut of £10K??

 

As always, if you are a Union members they will be able to help you with these issues.

 

Regards,

 

Paul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...