Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank Charges -Stay Lifted Court Date...HELP!!!


redjax
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5390 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I've been a member for some months but this is my first post. I have carefully followed all the instructions for reclaiming bank charges for my 2 sons. The son who was with the Woolwich was paid out after the first letter but he was only charged £400 so a success there. The youngest son banks with the Nationwide BS and they strung it out until it became subject to the stay order. I have successfully applied to have the stay lifted. My court date is next Thursday 29 November. I wasn't requested to send in a court bundle but I did it anyway and now I am cacking myself because the date is getting nearer and nearer. I was hoping for an offer before the date but if it doesn't come and I end up in court I don't have any idea of what to say, what to ask or anything. This claim involves over £4000 so I don't want to mess it up after coming so far. Can anyone help me with some advice on what to say, how to argue my case etc....please....!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, it is so nice to know there are people out there waiting to help...an boy do I need help! I only got it lifted because of the advice and templates on this site. The main reason it was lifted I think is they have taken over £4000 from my sons account in charges and now have debt collectors hassling him for a £1200 overdraft - all made up of bank charges!

 

I am so hoping you can help me to successful conclusion, but I must admit to being more than a little bit jittery now.

 

It is being heard at Bromley (in Kent) County Court. Keep thinking how for Christmas all I want is a friendly sympathetic barrister who wanted to stand in for me....but if that doesn't happen, please advise me how to act in court. I don't think shaking for 5 minutes and then throwing up for another 5 will impress the judge but that's my only options at the moment!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be suprised if you didnt get a phone call and letter offering settlement in the next few days- they really, really dont like courtrooms!

 

If you do find youself in court, do not worry- as a litigant in person you will be given every chance to make your case by the judge, who will make allowances for your position.

 

Firstly, you and Nationwide's representative will most likely be told to go out and try to sort it out between yourselves, only if they are so silly not to offer settlement will you need to make your case before the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were still hassling until I sent them a letter telling them to go ahead with the court action and that I would do what their client had done to us, i.e. apply for a stay on their case until our case against their client had been heard. I sent them a copy of all the paperwork regarding the court case including the stay lifting and they sent back saying they would discuss this with thier client and get back to us. Haven't heard anything since, but they did hassle us for weeks despite being told previously that we were involved in court action for the amount claimed as we disputed it. They sent letters offering a reduced amount in full settlement if we settled within 7 days which we refused. We have always stated that should the case be found against us we will immediately make arrangements to repay this overdraft.

The thing is, if I do end up in court, what do I say, I know I can't just say I think they charged us too much, do I quote anything from this website or what. Sorry to be so clueless but I can't help it, I am blonde afterall. If you can give me some direct questions, facts to quotes, answers or anything like that it would be great. With our luck I know we will end up in front of the Judge and if I wreck it for him after all this I will be so mad with myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, it would help to have an insight as to what arguments Nationwide have put forward in their defence then we can look at your arguements

 

you need to do some reading......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/641-case-guidance-notes-going.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/637-case-guidance-notes-bringing.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html

 

these threads are very informative,

 

the main thing is dont panic and dont be lead by what the barrister says to you out side of the court, some are known to try and suggest that you dont have a case and you should give up, just remember how many banks have paid out and how much money they have paid back, ultimatley if hte banks were so right they wouldnt hand over millions would they

regards

 

paul

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you use the CAG Particulars of Claim?

Yes

 

Did you calculate the charges from his bank statements?

Yes

 

Did you present the charges as a readily understandable table?

Yes

 

Did NW respond to your claim and file a defence?

Yes - sort of

 

If so, what did the defence say?

No details of actual defence were shown, we just received a copy of the bottom bit of the Acknowledgement of Service with the box 1, 'I intend to defend all of this claim' ticked.

This was of course issued to us after the initial claim was filed, we haven't heard anything since the stay was lifted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

okey dokey,

 

well no defence really does make it had to deal with, first thing in the morning i would suggest you get on the phone to the court and ask if there is a defence on file, they may have filed one they may not, they probably gambled on the case being stayed. in this instance, if there is no defence on file at the court then i would be filing for judgment in your favour

 

i would most definatley contact the court though and ask if there is a defence because you have not received it, ask if it has been sent you as it may be lost in the post

 

regards

paul

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did keep trying to post earlier but couldn't seem to get the system to accept me. Still at least I'm not on my own any more. Your advice has been very helpful and much appreciated. I will do the contacting the court thing and then I'll do my best if it comes to it. Keep your fingers crossed for me and I'll let you know the outcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, well dont forget many of us have been there, in the same position as yourself, its very daunting the thought of court

 

but its not as bad as you may think,

 

the judge will take into account that you are a litigant in person so the judge will most probably be helpful in explaining things to you

 

dont worry, if you need any help ask and we will do our best to help you

 

regards

paul

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you include in your application the info that the bank was attempting to enforce the debt by passing it to a DCA for collection? If so then this is why the stay was lifted.

 

The banks have been told by the Mercantile Court they can continue to have a stay but if they attempt to enforce any debt comprising bank penalty charges pre OFT case the stay will be lifted upon application by the debtor/claimant & the matter allowed to proceed to trial

Link to post
Share on other sites

& this is the case I refer to

In the High Court of Justice

Queens Bench Division

Leeds Mercantile Court

 

Before his Honour Judge Behrens

 

Claim No 7LS40812

 

Andrew Carlisle (Claimant) & Others

 

Clydesdale Bank (Trading as Yorkshire Bank) Defendant & Others

 

Date: 29th August 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

am i totally out of touch? or missing the point? (think Children of Men...if any of you saw it?) IS this the FIRST lifted stay and court case going ahead that i have seen so far on CAG!! (since waiver and stay became the 'norm') i have enquired on a few threads but found nothing else like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...