Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

!!!HI FOLKS!!! CForum virgin needs advice re DSG extended warranty


summers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone!

 

I have a small problem and wonder if anyone else had similar experiences...

 

 

I purchase a top of the range laptop for around 4yrs ago from pc world, and bought a 5 yr extended warranty which is held by DSG retail.

 

At the time of purchase I was told that if anything went wrong with the laptop they'd repair or replace for a new one. It sounded like the sensible thing to do considering I was paying one and a half grand for the system alone!

 

Well over the years, it has needed repairs which have been carried out, but this time they were unable to patch it up any more than it already had been so sent me replacement product vouchers. the only problem is that the replacement vouchers only amount to just less than 1/3 of the original price. They tell me in their letter that this is the amount for an equivalent replacement. the insurance has also been refunded pro rata but i can ONLY spend it on another warranty with them!

 

Anyway, I've searched high and low for an equivalent and cant see how they concluded this. I can find systems with general spec that is faster and better such but they lack the hardware and additional facilities of my laptop.

 

Anyone know what to do??? I'm really annoyed. :-x

 

Thanks folks !! :smile::smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that is what the warranty does - allows you to replace the product with an equivalent specification.

 

If you are disputing this you need to write to Coverplan in Sheffield (?) explaining why you think the value is inferior (which parts of the spec?) and asking if they could cover the difference.

 

I'd imagine the spec they would cover would be things like CPU, RAM, gfx, HDD, etc etc etc. There's not much else on a laptop anyway.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure if its the same now, but when i worked there just under a year ago you could go into a branch and fine an equivalent spec laptop. i.e pick a particular feature on your laptop that is only a more expensive laptop, then a helpful member of staff can call and request a voucher upgrade, wich is done straight away over the phone and a special code was given to write on the voucher.

 

for example buy tv a few years ago with say, a component input. 4 years later its still not a standard feature but it's something that you need and the only tv that has it cost £300 more, 9 times out of te i used to get the vouchers upgraded

:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks v much for this info guys.

 

At least i now have somewhere tangible to start!

 

Well my laptop had harmon kardon speakers and nvidia graphics card plus power saver function. may be nothing 2 some, but these additions were something to me, especially since i was coming from a mac background. if it was going 2 slum it with a pc-it had 2 b the best! lol! :wink:

 

but on a serious note... do you think these types of things are justifiable for a voucher upgrade??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say yes to both, but especially if you cannot get an equivalent video chip. A downgrade in video will be a significant performance hit, and make the system useless for a range of tasks that your older model was perfectly capable of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah. thats exactly my argument.

 

oh well, looks like i'll be going to pc world in the next few days.

 

hope i have something good 2 report. hope they let me use the insurance voucher towards the cost of a laptop. i dont fancy taking out another insurance with them...

 

wish me luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say you'd just be looking at the speakers then. I'd imagine all laptops have come on in terms of graphics a lot in five years so even the low end laptops would now have more graphics power than yours did.

 

They all have power save features and have done for years unless you're looking for something specific.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i agree, they do mostly have more ram and ghz than mine but even 4 yrs on, the quality of my then top of the range toshiba is still hard to find at a low budget. sure i can get faster machines with more memory, but the build quality, speakers, and like i mentioned nvidia card dont seem to come in the cheaper models. even down to the touch of the keypad, and the weight of the laptop. the slimline design etc. even in todays market there are some things that they dont seem to focus on when building budget machines. wish id have stuck to a mac now. wouldnt have been such an issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say screw them for everything you can. You paid for the warrenty after all. Get a short list of things about your laptop, that only comes with paying good money, and make sure you get equivalent.

 

If your laptop has a good video chip, you need a good video chip. If your laptop is slim and compact, that is what you paid for because you carry it around a lot. If you paid out for good speakers, you expect good speakers.

 

If we where talking about a cheap laptop you had bough, fair enough, but if you paid the premium for a quality system, you should expect to get at least these features in return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...