Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A & L New Terms


ladykenco
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the 21st Sep this was released

 

Alliance & Leicester recently decided to abolish overdraft interest rates on its Premier Direct and Premier Current accounts. But overdrafts won't be free. A&L will instead charge 50p a day, capped at £5 a month, for authorised borrowing. If you go over the overdraft limit, the charge jumps to £5 a day. There is also a £25 charge for unpaid direct debits and bounced cheques, although this is lower than the previous £34.

Andy Bayes, head of current accounts at A&L, says: "The changes mean that customers using their agreed overdraft will never pay more than £5 a month, regardless of the amount they are overdrawn or the number of days - and very many will pay less.

However, research by uSwitch.com shows that an authorised overdraft could cost customers up to £5 a month, or £60 a year. That's equivalent to an overdraft interest rate of 6.15%, which is slightly higher than the previous rate on the Premier Direct Account of 5.9%.

Overdraft interest charges scrapped

Sep 21, 2007

Alliance & Leicester has announced it is scrapping interest charges on overdrafts and replacing them with a daily fee for people who go into the red.

The group said it was the first UK bank to abolish overdraft interest for all its customers.

Instead of being charged overdraft interest of 5.9% or 7.9% and an overdraft arrangement fee, A&L customers who have an authorised overdraft will pay a daily charge of 50p, capped at £5 a month.[

The bank said changes, which are being introduced from October 22, meant no one would ever pay more than £5 a month for an agreed overdraft, regardless of how overdrawn they were or how many days they used the facility.

Customers who stay in the black will not be charged anything to run their current account. But people who breach their credit limit or who have an unauthorised overdraft will face stiffer penalties of £5 a day, with no limit on the amount they can be charged in a month, compared with its previous charge of £25 on day one, followed by a second £25 charge five days later if they were still over their limit.

The group is also scrapping its current charges of £25 for payments which are made while someone has an unauthorised overdraft and £34 if payments are bounced. Instead people will have payments of less than £10 processed free, while they will incur a penalty charge of £25 for every payment above this amount that goes out of their account.

The group, which is the latest high street bank to change its overdraft charges, said the move had been prompted by the current High Court test case between a number of banks and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) over unauthorised overdraft charges.

Andy Bayes, head of current accounts at A&L, said: "Alliance & Leicester is committed to offering free banking for customers who stay in credit - our research confirms that 94% of people agree that having a bank account should be free.

But he added that the research showed that 81% of people thought that if banking was free, it was fair that customers had to pay when they went overdrawn.

The bank found that there was a lot of confusion surrounding overdraft rates, with 62% of people with an overdraft not knowing the rate they were charged, while those who thought they knew, massively underestimated it.

 

Today after logging into my internet banking I see I have charges to pay for between 17th Oct - 16th Nov of £25, after looking through my statement yes I was overdrawn on 5th Nov by £5, So I rang them to be told that b'cos my statements are drawn on the 17th of every month there has not been the 30 days since that date before I was overdrawn so I have to still pay the £25 not the £5 per day...I did have a go stating that they said 22nd of October and I was not o/d till the 5th November but they are saying that you have to be 30 days after your statement date before the £5 a day comes in to play. What utter rubbish!

I am fuming and cannot wait until this court case finishes, I have every confidence that it will go in our favour then we can all claim what is rightfully ours!

Anyone else had this problem??? Would be interested in what you have been told.

 

Started 25th Sep 2006 - got cheque on 4th December 2006. Settled without interest but full amount plus court costs :)

A & L Watch out buddy you are next 2007!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok after reading through this site throughout the day, spending at least 5 hours reading LOL

I now plan on starting a claim, even with the Test Case looming should I start now?

Also is there an act or something I can state when they take their charges and make me overdrawn? I know its classed as unauthorised lending and is illegal without an agreement. Also I have an online account with no paper statements, I have got my list of charges so no probs there straight to Prelim letter......Anyway when you have a non paper statement account do they still have to write and advise you of charges being made on your account? They havent done this, I have only found out once logging into my account and viewing charges etc..

Thankyou for any help you can give.....:)

 

Started 25th Sep 2006 - got cheque on 4th December 2006. Settled without interest but full amount plus court costs :)

A & L Watch out buddy you are next 2007!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...