Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Headwinduk Vs Lloyds


headwinduk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

This is my first post here although I've used this site for most of my advice so far.

 

Over the last six years I've had almost £1600 in bank charges mostly in the first 2 or 3 years. I have written to Lloyds saying I will take them to court and had the usual letter back saying that the charges are not umlawful. So about two months ago I wrote another letter saying I will take them to court and sent up to date copies of all the statements with a new breakdown of charges. They were charges for unauthorised overdraft use, and returned D/D and cheques.

 

I havn't had the cash for court fees until now and I need to know if I can just act on my previous letter which stated that I would take them to court if they didn't refund within 14 days.

 

Also some of the charges I had itemised are now beyond 6 years in the past. So do I need to write a new letter intending court action with an up to date breakdown of charges within the last six years or can I act on my old letter and the sum that was owed at that time? Does my initial complaint stand as the amount I can claim or does it change as certain charges go beyond six years?

 

Also I currently have a loan with Lloyds for about £1500 which they called a refinancing loan on an unauthorised overdraft. If my county court claim is put on hold pending the test case could I argue that my loan should be put on hold? or perhaps this would help me get into court.

Should I state this when making my court application?

Or even stop using the account all together and stop paying the loan?

 

Any advice would be well appreciated.

Thanks

Edwin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Edwin.

 

Just continue with your claim according to your own timetable. You won’t have to amend your breakdown of charges because the time counts from the date of your first letter to LTSB.

 

It is frequently argued that it counts from the date that you became aware of the unlawful bank charges issue, which could be long before your initial letter. That might enable you to add a few more charges!

 

Either the court will make an order to stay your claim, or LTSB will apply for a stay, either of which you are entitled to object to. Whether you will be successful will depend on the Judge and/or LTSB’s actions, but don’t be too optimistic!

 

Are the loan repayments up to date?

If not, have you been defaulted?

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Els

so I can just add to my breakdown of charges all charges within six years of my first letter and use that in my court application- without sending a new breakdown to the bank first?

 

I havn't missed any payments on my loan and generaly my account is kept in good order nowadays- used unauthorised overdraft twice this year and only by pence.

 

I've read in some threads about telling the bank that my account is in dipute. Is this an option with my loan whilst I wait for this to unfold? I intend to start banking elsewhere soon anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's better to send a copy of your revised schedule to the bank. They probably won't read it, but if they complain at a later staqe, you can demonstrate that you kept them informed. Send everything 'signed for' so that you can prove you informed them.

 

Personally, I wouldn't mention the loan at all. It isn't causing any problems for you, or the bank, so why draw attention to it? Even if you change banks, you can continue to pay the loan repayments (or pay it off).

 

It's only your current account that is in dispute, not the loan account, so to stop payments may well provoke the bank into defaulting you and calling in the balance.

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...