Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice wanted ;Selling a house


bullyboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5997 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

About 7 years ago my mother in law decided to move closer to us after her husband had died some 5 years earlier, She was too old to get a mortgage so my wife and I took out a mortgage for 17000 which was the difference required between selling her old house and the cost of the new one (55,000). She paid us each month for the amount the mortgage was and it went straight out of my account each month no problem, last year I had some spare cash so I cleared her mortgage completely for her so she could retire and not have to work to pay us her mortgage, so we cleared everything and the deeds duly turned up in my wife and my names. Now here is the problem, the mother in law has decided that now she has retired that she is bored, got no friends and wants to move back to where she comes from. The problem I have is if we sell the house which is our joint names can we just give her the money? do we have to pay capital gains tax or would it be easier to transfer the deeds back into her name and let her get on with it? What started out as doing a good deed has become a nightmare of how to give it back. Any advice or pointers would be appreciated.

 

Bullyboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thread moved here for you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIUI, and you will need to check this with a good tax accountant.

 

Your MIL and you own the house in direct proportion to the amount of money you put into the purchase. The possession of the deeds is immaterial to this - they were simply security for the mortgage.

 

When the house is sold, your MIL will be free of any capital gain as the house is her main residence. You will be liable for CGT on your proportion. You can mitigate this by gifting irrevocably one half of your share to your wife - a simple letter will do. This splits the capital gain equally between you and allows you 2 lots of individual tax allowance (currently £ 8,800). You may also find that you can each gift your MIL £ £,500 worth of house share for this tax year to alter the proportional ownership and thus your capital gain. Be aware that you will both need to live for a further 7 years after making this gift. Had you planned properly from the first, you could each have made such a gift in every tax year.

 

You will need to consult an accountant on at least 2 items

 

1) whether you qualify for taper relief, and

2) whether, in your situation, you may be better off waiting for the CGT changes due in April (ie flat rate 18% and no taper relief; plus an increase in personal allowance to £ 9,200)

 

Finally, you should enquire of an accountant as to whether it could be held that by paying you for the mortgage, your MIL has, in fact being buying your share of the house from you and that you would only be liable for the proportion of the gain where you have paid outright (ie the final lump sum payment of the mortgage)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately need an accountant to get this one right.

 

It appears the deeds do not contain MIL's name even though she paid bulk of the house (deposit & repaying part to yoursleves). Under ToLATA your MIL would indeed prove her element of ownership, however, HMRC will assume it is yours/wifes as you are on the deeds.

 

You cannot escape by simply transferring the deeds to MIL as you will still have to complete a capital gains declaration. It may be that you can complete a Trust Declaration stating who owns what percentage (based on what paid) and HMRC will discount MIL's real share, leaving the capital lump sum you paid last year.

 

The capital lump sum you paid (based on house price rises over the last 7 years) going to give you a large return. You can gift half to your wife, so effectively increasing your capital gains to £18400 between you.

 

Under inheritance tax rules, you can each gift your MIL £3000 each for this year, and if you made no gifts last year then also £3000 each for last year. You may gift the entire proceeds to your MIL but if this is over £12000 (assuming gifting over last and this year) then the balance is subject to Inheritance Tax rules for the next 7 years (only a problem if your estate is going to be over I think £315,000).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...