Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mbna - How unhelpful!!!


clowders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I need some help with MBNA.

 

My partner and I contacted MBNA to reduce our payments and freeze interest and charges as we are struggling to meet our debts. We enclosed a chq with the lower payment, together with a list of our other debts, income and outgoings.

 

However, MBNA have cashed the chq, but added another £200 of charges and interest and late fees (total debt £10,400).

 

I have been an MBNA customer since 1999 and have been reading about other people sending CCA letters, but is it to late as we have effectively stated we acknowledge the debt with our first letter.

 

If it is not too late where can I find a copy of the CCA letter and how does the process work.

 

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Letter N is the CCA template. Send the SAR request off, enclosing a photocopy of ID, and enclose £10 chq/po...... send it recorded.

Also send the CCA off, again recorded with the £1 fee

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clowders,

 

When you send the CCA Request make sure you add the following sentence to the top of the letter:

 

I ACKNOWLEDGE NO DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

i would also advise against signing any letter you send them, ie CCA's, S.A.R - (Subject Access Request);s etc, instead use a digital signature, see this thread for details http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/110578-digital-signature-guide.html some Card companies have been suspected of scanning signtaures onto agreements to make them enforcable!

 

Sending a SAR request means MBNA are required to send all documents/info they hold on you, including all charges,fees debited from your account, you may find a significant amount of the balance is made up of charges in which case you can start claiming them back.

 

Sending a CCA request is a legal request for a copy of the signed executed agreement that MBNA hold on you, if no agreement exists then the debt is unenforcable as MBNA have no legal recourse to enforce the debt. Similarly, if they provide an agreement which lacks certain prescribed terms, is illegible or contravenes the Consumer Credit Act and Regulations it may also be unenforcable. CCA Requests are a great way of ascertaining whether the creditor has a legal right to collect the debt, and also can be used as a bargaining tool as well.

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Shane. I will definately change my signature from now on although I have just sent them a letter in regard to reducing the payments and used my normal signature. Lets hope they lose the letters:) . Will send off the letters tomorrow. Is it okay to send the CCA and SAR at the same time or should I leave a cap between?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Clowders,

 

I see you no reason why you can't send them at the same time. It should be noted that in a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) you should receive all info relating to your account including the credit agreement, however the benefit of the CCA is the statuatory time period the creditor has to respond by (being 12 days from receipt) and subsequently, should they not respond in that time the acount goes into default and they are unable to enforce it.

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would just send them off together. MBNA have a habit of wanting things like your passport or drivers license as a form of I.D. before sending documents to you (could it possible be because they have your signature on them?). Do not send them, if they really want proof of I.D. I find a copy of one of the threatening letters they have sent you should suffice.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

With refernce to the request for agreement details. MBNA use Hillesden Securities and it is them who have been requested to send agreement details. The have said thanks for the £1.00 fee. and stated they will try to find the original . But if not send a true copy. They inted to update the info within the next 21 DAYS. I thought they had to send it within 12 working days.

Although they work on a Saturday they dont count that as a working day. Perhaps the staff work for nothing. What would you suggest the next step is as they do not intend to send the paperwork within the stated time of the law. and furthermore they have two entries on a credit file for a substantial amount when only one acount is held. That sounds a bit of a farce to me. As they are threatening to take the account holders to court and get a charge on the property HELP HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blencathra it's best if you start your own thread on this, otherwise your posts will be lost in this thread.

But if not send a true copy. They inted to update the info within the next 21 DAYS. I thought they had to send it within 12 working days.

It's a standard letter. They are aware of their legal obligations - if they can't comply that's their problem not yours.
Although they work on a Saturday they dont count that as a working day.
No company, DCA or otherwise, counts Saturday as a working day.
What would you suggest the next step is as they do not intend to send the paperwork within the stated time of the law
You just have to wait, other than that you don't have to do anything.
furthermore they have two entries on a credit file for a substantial amount when only one acount is held.
Please can you give more details on this.
they are threatening to take the account holders to court and get a charge on the property
Is there a CCJ on this account? A charging order takes some time (it is not as they would have you believe a case of popping down to the courts on a Monday morning and getting a charging order ganted by the weekend) the pocess is CCJ, charging order nisi then charging order absolute. If they don't already have a CCJ and can't produce a copy of the agreement , as long as the CCJ is defended, they can forget about a CCJ never mind a charging order.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Rory32. With reference to the 2 accounts . What i meant to say was that the credit file shows 2 entries both MBNA credit cards for a similar amount outstanding amount. But the Holder of the cards only has 1 account and 1 card So somebody else credit card has been put under the wrong name and credit file and they are only taking the matter to Court for the amount of 1 credit card. Is this another example of information on somebody else going astray or they dont know what they are doing.

 

At the moment there is no CCJ on the account Hillesden Securities have threatened to put the matter before the courts and get a CCJ and a Charging order at the same time. I think a defense claim should be registered in reply to the summons. But still no agreement in the post yet 6 days of the 12 have already gone A summons has been issued

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

The MBNA fun and games have really started. I am receiving numerous calls from them and have had a letter requesting me to contact them to discuss a few points. :lol: I think not!

 

I have ignored all phone calls and wrote a letter stating that I only wish to communicate in writing due to dealing with so many financial institutions at once and the cost of calling from mobile telephone as I currently have no house phone at the moment due to a fault.

 

Anyway they are still charging me interest, so I am currently waiting the 12 working days but can someone please tell me is there another letter I can send if they do not response after 12 days.

 

I opened this account between 98-00, hopefully they won't have the CCA.

 

Although I cannot believe the posts about scanning signatures on to other CCA's especially as I signed my inital letter with my true signature. If they send me a signed CCA i will request a copy of the letter to check whether they are the same as surely no judge would believe a signature is an exact match nearly 10 years later.

 

All other letters sent have got amended signatures and I have photocopies for the reasons listed above. So thanks everyone for the advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone please tell me is there another letter I can send if they do not response after 12 days.

 

You don't need to send them a letter after the 12 working days. They are aware that they are in default.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the 12 working days are up and they haven't supplied a copy of the agreement you can lawfully withhold all payments until a copy of the agreement is produced.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...