Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Aesmith - Thank you for your recent interest in my issues.  Input on people's topics can be most useful from specialised experts or those that have similar experiences.  Some people really struggle with knowing what to do (I certainly do) - so it is most useful and helpful and reassuring when solid sensible advice is offered.  I have found there to be some very kind, helpful, supportive and legally knowledgeable people here on cag over the years - who give sound legal advice for people to roll up their sleeves and follow up on.   Of course, sometimes it can be quite challenging sifting the wheat from the chaff.  I don't have lawyer or barrister.  I sometimes attend pro-bono legal clinics for help.  And sometimes have access to barristers via a pro-bono service called Advocate.  Both ad-hoc. 
    • The Judge was wrong. The keeper is only INVITED to say who was driving, there is no obligation for them to say.
    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TRACYFLYY v HSBC


TRACYFLYY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Tracy, have you read Rory's posts on your other thread ?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/116663-please-can-anyone-help.html

 

They will threaten you and try to extort the money out of you thats what debt collectors do but if you have a legitimate case you can tell them to go fourth and multiply.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have you at any time told the bank they should be dealing with your case on this basis? If so and you think you have been badly treated - can you let me know. I cant help much more than the good advice you have had above but I am trying to get some case summaries for CRFX to send to the FSA.

 

It was part of the agreement between the FSA/OFT and the banks that although current claims would be "stayed" that "hardship " cases would be filtered through.

 

If you feel that SINCE THE WAIVER you have

1) appealed against a stay on this basis and been refused

 

(Just to clarify, the courts have a right to stay any case but banks should

not apply for a stay in cases of hardship.)

 

2) contacted your bank and asked to be considered on this basis and been refused

3) had been offered a settlement which has now been retracted

 

Then if you would be willing to either pm me or post details here I am trying to help crfx collect data to send to the FSA.

 

Here is a link to the proceedure the banks were supposed to adhere to

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Re...ction_disp.pdf

 

And also an extract from the website announcement.

  • Consumers who have received a final response from the bank/building society which does not include an offer
    Consumers still have the option of complaining to FOS. However, the banks and building societies have also requested that the FOS does not consider any complaints about unauthorised overdraft charges until resolution of the test case.
  • Consumers who are in very difficult financial circumstances - 'hardship cases'
    Banks and building societies will have to conduct a filtering process to ensure that cases of genuine hardship are still dealt with during the waiver period. Cases of hardship would still be entitled to be referred to, and dealt with by, the FOS.

__________________

 

:-) This is also a useful thread to read Success at A and L via hardship case route

 

 

 

thanks

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah but I thought that somewhere in that carlisle vs clydesdale case there was something the high court judge said about the bank not being able to go for enforcement action whilst the account, or amount at least, was in dispute?

 

Just found it - point 11 in the Judge's ramblings.

 

As the banks and courts and solicitors etc seem to be happy to quote this particular case, could it not also be argued in our favour for a change?

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete u little grass!!! :p

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have You Seen The Announcement Today _ Details Of Cases Like Your Are Needed>

 

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

This weekend I was sent loads of letters by my standing orders and direct debits. I have two accounts with hsbc one for bills and one for normal usage. It was the normal usage one that I was taking to court to claim charges. I found out today that hsbc has closed my other account without informing me and all my family tax pensions everything has gone into this account. What can I do I am now going to get defaults with no fault of my own because hsbc has cancelled them all without informing me and closed my account without informing me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This weekend I was sent loads of letters by my standing orders and direct debits. I have two accounts with hsbc one for bills and one for normal usage. It was the normal usage one that I was taking to court to claim charges. I found out today that hsbc has closed my other account without informing me and all my family tax pensions everything has gone into this account. What can I do I am now going to get defaults with no fault of my own because hsbc has cancelled them all without informing me and closed my account without informing me.

 

Hi Tracy,

 

Firstly, deep breath....then realise that even if companies slap defaults on people for fun, they do not usually do it without some warning...

 

Are you saying that HSBC have closed an accoutn and kept your money in it? If not you should have the funds elsewhere to pay the cancel DD's etc. I recently had a problem with Abbey where for whatever reason they refused to set up any DD's, it has been over a month now and I have sorted the mess out and re set up those DD's without anyone getting upset as I spoke to them straight away to explain.

 

Speak to those concerned and let them know what has happened. Give them alternate account details or post a cheque. Or tell them when you will post a cheque.

 

This should sort the problem out. If I have missed understood then obviously let me know and I will readvise, but from what you wrote this is my understanding of what has happened.

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the account have an overdrawn balance? or did it have money in it when they closed it?

 

If it had money in it I can only think they have set this off against your overdrawn account (transfered the balance)... you said some time ago you had opened an Alliance & Leicester account can you get your benefits and payments moved to this account?

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it was because you had a few threads going and it was possibly confusing the people trying to help you. don't panic it wasn't you, it was the magical merging of UK.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it looks like that doesn't it. I had two accounts and one is still overdrawn they asked me to pay 50 pound a month to them and I agreed but then they closed my pther account and took my money and cancelled direct debits BUT!!! we come to some kind of agreement, every month. How can they do this? These are benefits surely it is not right. Thanks for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a quick look at their terms and conditions and it states:

 

12.4 If we wish to close your account, we will give you at least 30 day's notice in writing unless there are circumstances which justify us in closing the account on earlier notice. We will repay any credit balance to you. You should also return any cards we have issued to you on the account having cut them into at least six pieces and any unused cheques.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also states (under miscellaneous)

 

6.1 If any accounts you hold with us are in credit, we may use any of them to reduce or repay any amounts you owe on other accounts you hold with us anywhere in the same name (including card accounts and any joint accounts) whether or not those accounts are in the same currency. If we decide to do so:

* we will tell you why and when it has been done; and

* in doing so, we may (and you irrevocably authorise us to):

- bring an end any fixed deposit period applying to any of the accounts you hold with us and adjust any interest payable by the bank;

- convert to sterling at the prevailing market rate of exchange any balance that is in a currency other than sterling;

and in doing so we will have no liablity to you.

 

Nothing in this clause will prevent us from exercising at any time any other right of set-off or of combination of accounts to reduce or repay any amounts you owe us.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...