Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6011 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anybody please offer me some advice. I took a loan out last year through Loans.co.uk. I was told when taking out the loan that the ppi would be best for me from the answers that I had given to a demands and needs questionnaire. I do not recall that they told me that it would be a single premium PPI and that this would only last for 3 years. They have written back to me say that it was all discussed in a phone call and also that I received a letter with all the terms and conditions included. I dont recall either. They have said that that is there final decision and if i wish to complain any further it will have to be to the FOS. I have a couple of questions to ask:-

 

1. Should I send a DPA letter and get all the transcripts with them ?

 

2. I also believe that the 3 years single premium is unsatisfactory as the loan is for 15 years, can i make any complaint with regards to this?

 

3. Also if i didnt get anywhere with the PPI mis-sold route, How do i go about cancelling the single premium PPI as it is on a secured loan.I believe that the FSA did a report on cancelling single premium PPI and what rights do i have ?

 

Any help would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Nicho,

 

well to be honest i'm not the best one for advice as new at this myself...

 

There is a few question they should have also asked you.

 

Did they ask you if you had any other PPi insurance to cover this ?

Did they tell you that you could go to another company for a quote for a PPI ?

Did they give you a quote without PPI ?

Did they tell you that you did'nt need to have PPI as its optional ?

Did they tell you the cover was for only 3years on phone ?

 

all of these are basic question they should have asked you.

 

I think as for the PPi only covering for 3 years is a real no no !!

 

The best person to ask on her is hellhasnofury:D

 

Good Luck............Go for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you for putting me right :confused: but i had read this somewhere perhaps i had read it wrong :eek:

 

Cheers............:smile:

No problem.;)

 

Information about the way any insurance should be sold is buried within the FSA's website. That is the source of information I would trust the most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody please offer me some advice. I took a loan out last year through Loans.co.uk. I was told when taking out the loan that the ppi would be best for me from the answers that I had given to a demands and needs questionnaire. I do not recall that they told me that it would be a single premium PPI and that this would only last for 3 years. They have written back to me say that it was all discussed in a phone call and also that I received a letter with all the terms and conditions included. I dont recall either. They have said that that is there final decision and if i wish to complain any further it will have to be to the FOS. I have a couple of questions to ask:-

 

Answer your own questions, have a read of this link When did you take your loan out????

 

FSA fines loan broker £455,000 for PPI selling failures

 

1. Should I send a Data Protection Act letter and get all the transcripts with them ? Yes

 

2. I also believe that the 3 years single premium is unsatisfactory as the loan is for 15 years, can i make any complaint with regards to this? Yes

 

3. Also if i didnt get anywhere with the PPI mis-sold route, How do i go about cancelling the single premium PPI as it is on a secured loan.I believe that the FSA did a report on cancelling single premium PPI and what rights do i have ? There is a thread on the forum regarding this.

 

Any help would be much appreciated

 

Hello and welcome,

 

there has to be good reasons why you believe that ppi was mis-sold.

 

The fact that they did not tell you you could get it cheaper elsewhere, Is, I feel, not relevant to mis-selling as they are a business. It would be up to you really to shop around for this, like buying a car. A car saleperson is not going to tell you, that you can buy the same car cheaper down the road.

 

If they told you that you could not get the loan without having ppi, well that is mis-selling. I think if you look on the ppi claims sticky by reidnet, he has listed the reasons for mis-selling.

 

Martin lewis when he did the list of mis-selling on the telly last week, did state that not informing you of being able to get it cheaper elsewhere, constituted mis-selling but I am not too sure of that one.

 

He also stated that the fact that they had been fined for mis-selling by the FSA was another good reason.

 

Please read the FSA site as RR has suggested, their is a wealth of information to be found on there. Read around the different threads on the forum, to get up to date info of ppi, and how to reclaim it back if it was mis-sold.

 

Please remember they will absolutely deny it. They have too, but just keep at them.

Good luck and keep us posted.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...