Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rinch05 v Lloyds ***WON***


Rinch05
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6283 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes your right! I dont think its got a lot to do with it ,more like we should have had eneugh to cover the penalties??I was just trying to put something of my owne in the summery?

 

Ah, I see. Yes, it would be useful to add bits like that in, the more evidance you can include that the charges are unreasonable the better.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I need to include Robinson Vs Harman 1848.in my documents if I mentioned it in the summery? If so where can I find it??

 

This is already summerised as part of the 'court bundle'.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am puting my court doc together and on the latest schdule we are only claiming up until the date we filed our claim right !subsequent charges will have to be recouped an another time???

 

Right. You can't add any more that have been imposed since the date of issue.

 

How are you getting on with it? Sorted yet?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fraid so! Hope you've got plenty of paper!

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49379-photoman-lloyds-business.html

 

Finally got all my costs together, Prelim will be in the post on Wednesday, so any visits to my thread tommorow to help with the scary first steps would be much appreciated !

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry BTW.....reason I posted my last thread here was because I'm also up against Lloyds, and you guys have been there.....done it.......got the T-shirts !!

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Phone Lloyds tsb solicitors today to check if Docs 250pg were recieved & if they felt like giveing up yet??

All docd were recieved, but no white flag yet!! getting bit concerned as court is on 30th Jan!! Suppose I should get my copies of Docs together look at the court procedure bits ???:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all 1 I have today recieved a "Ganeral form of judgment or order" form N24

 

General Form of Judgment or Order

 

To the Claimant

In the

WEYMOUTH

County Court

Claim Number

6QZ67792

 

Claimant (including ref.)

 

 

Defendant (including ref.)

Lloyds Tsb Bank Plc DX36675 BRIGHTON 2

 

Date

17 January 2007

 

 

 

Before DISTRICT ( name removed ) sitting at Weymouth County Court, Westwey House, Westwey Road,Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 STE.

Upon reading the Court file and Upon the Court’s own initiative

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. Unless the Defendant do by 4pm on 25 January 2007 file and serve documents/witness statements as ordered on 13 November 2006 the defence be struck out and judgment be entered forthwith for the Claimant with costs on the claim and the hearing on 30 January 2007 be vacated.

 

 

Dated 09 January 2007

 

Fingers Crossed!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rinch, this is excellent news. Another judge is obviously sick to the back teeth of Lloyds silly abusive games.

 

Expect a settlement very soon then, or if they don't reply costs will be ordered in your favour too! Fantastic!:D

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you take no action other than to wait. Don't contact the bank or their solicitors. On 26th as soon as the ocurt opens go along there with the documents, see if anything has been filed with the court then apply for judgment.

Put the bailiffs in as soon as you get the judgment. Don't contact the bank about it. However, do contact me as I do now who to tell - and I am not very good at keeping this kind of secret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If all goes well & we get our penalty charges etc credited back to our account we will still be £1700 overdrawn with no imidiate way of paying it back!

In light of this do you think if we put the ballifs in for our claim Lloyds may decideto do the same to us??

 

After I have applied for judgment how long will it take to come ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read some threads & the mail peice about how the bailiffs seem to have bungled declan purcells claim or not??

Still not sure what to do if Lloyds ignore/wont pay etc ??

I will have to take time off to apply for judgment on fri Morning!

I need to decide what to do & how to do it by then??

I suppose you just ask at the court for the court bailiffe to recover the money??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
as I do now who to tell - and I am not very good at keeping this kind of secret.

 

Care to share that with us then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned the court on the 26th and was informed that they had moved the hearing date as the defendant was going to settle ???????

& yes yes another sucess Lloyds have payed up !!!!

well all but £40 ish?? So I thaught??

So I phoned to query this point with there solicitors who phoned back to say they made it £80 was still owing ?? BONUS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...