Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
    • If you do get a letter of Claim and or Pre Action Protocol pack 15. Where there has been non-compliance with a pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction, the court may order that (a) the parties are relieved of the obligation to comply or further comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (b) the proceedings are stayed while particular steps are taken to comply with the pre-action protocol or this Practice Direction; (c) sanctions are to be applied. 16. The court will consider the effect of any non-compliance when deciding whether to impose any sanctions which may include— (a) an order that the party at fault pays the costs of the proceedings, or part of the costs of the other party or parties; (b) an order that the party at fault pay those costs on an indemnity basis; (c) if the party at fault is a claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, an order depriving that party of interest on that sum for a specified period, and/or awarding interest at a lower rate than would otherwise have been awarded; (d) if the party at fault is a defendant, and the claimant has been awarded a sum of money, an order awarding interest on that sum for a specified period at a higher rate, (not exceeding 10% above base rate), than the rate which would otherwise have been awarded. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct   .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Really Really Need Help re: CCA Reply!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I really need some advice re a CCA response i've had from Fredrickson Interntional.....

I had 2 loans and a credit card with Egg - which I fell behind on payments due to the fact i've recently had a baby, and am a single mum! I've ALWAYS been able to pay before - but Maternity pay doesn't quite cover enough for food and nappies let alone debt!

Anyway - Egg, rather than helping me out - had originally passed all three debts on to DLC - I had sent a CCA request to DLC who provided me with one real one for the large loan - but didn't send the two others. Anyway - i'd agreed to pay DLC £10 pm for what I thought was all three debts. All this was back in March - and i'd been paying every month. Then suddenly out of the blue about a month ago - I started getting phone calls from Fredrickson International. I actually refused to give them my details over the phone and told them to write to me.....I then received two individual letters saying Egg had passed the smaller loan and the credit card debt to them. I immediately CCA'd them (as far as i'm aware i'm paying DLC for this still???) and I also gave Fredrickson my new address as they'd been writing to my parents.

They sent me back my cheque for £2 saying it was unnessesary - this was sent again to my parents address despite me telling them my new address. Then they sent another letter saying they were waiting for advice from their client. Finally i've just received two statements. One showing payments for the loan, and one showing spending on the credit card. There is nothing with my signature on or anything else that says it's my debt. Again they sent everything to my parents address.

So they've ignored my request to write to me at my new address, sent back my CCA cheque and now think that these two statements mean i'll acknowedge the debt it with them.

Do the statements count as CCA's or not? And why are they ignoring my request to write to me at my new address and who should I be paying. DLC are still accepting my £10 per month - in fact they've just written to me asking for a break down of my finances because they want to review it.

I'm really confused about it all and really need some advice on what to do next?

Thanks!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly no, statements are not credit agreements.

 

Send another CCA request to Fredrickson, enclosing the £1 per account and insist that they comply with your properly formatted request. Use the letter here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

 

send it Guaranteed Next Day delivery if you can afford it as it is better than recorded delivery. Highlight the bit in the letter about their responsibility even if they are not the original creditor, then after posting your letters, sit back and wait the 12 working days after the letter being signed for. After that they can do nothing unless they come up with the agreements. You should also receive, as part of your CCA request, a statement of account showing all payments to and from the accounts.

 

Do they claim to own the debts or just to be collecting them from the Original Creditor? If they do, you want to see the Notice of Assignments which you should have received from the OC and or Fredrickson's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send the CCA request by rec. delivery ?.... and did you send a separate one for each account ?

 

If not, then you need to send them off immediately. If you have and they have failed to comply, then they are in default and there is no need to re-send. They just need a suitable bog off letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I sent the CCA request by rec delivery. But I don't understand why they sent me back my cheque! Am I right in thinking then that they HAVE to send me a copy of my credit agreement with my signature on it for it to stand? Should I just write back stating that they haven't sent what I asked for??? And that I refuse to acknowledge any debt to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a cheque returned to me once as well.... and filed it away, like everything else. The request still stands though. Yes to your question; they are legally obliged to comply with your request, or cannot pursue the debt.

 

There is no need to write back.... they are fully aware of receiving the request and receive enough of them on here to know what it means. Keep hold of all correspondence in the meantime (along with the returned cheque) and wait it out until they are in default (12 working days).

 

After this time, you are not legally obliged to continue with any payments until/unless they can produce the document.... so if you are currently paying by Standing Order, you would be within your rights to cancel it.

 

:)

 

You need to have sent a separate CCA request for each account though.... in order to cover yourself ! Have you only sent the one ?.... as it sounds as if DLC are collecting on one/some and Fredrickson may have acquired the others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if I ignore them and don't write back saying they've not sent what I asked for - then won't they try and take further action against me??? In the letter that they sent with the two statements - they've put that they've supplied me with what I asked for - and are now awaiting my response as to how i'm going to settle the account.

Do you think Egg have not got the Credit Agreements anymore? It seems odd that they won't supply them for these two smaller debts but managed for the bigger one. And if Egg can't supply it does that mean they have to write the debt off?

Sorry so many questions - but never been in this situation before and don't want to be intimidated into paying anything i don't have to by Fredricksons!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are in default of your legal request for a CCA. They cannot pursue you whilst in default. I would report them to TS as well as asking to supply you with a copy of their complaints procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if I ignore them and don't write back saying they've not sent what I asked for - then won't they try and take further action against me??? These companies rely on public ignorance most of the time.... so although they may threaten further action, the debt canot be re-enforced without a CCA. It's the law. In the letter that they sent with the two statements - they've put that they've supplied me with what I asked for - and are now awaiting my response as to how i'm going to settle the account. Standard bowlarks, I'm afraid... you wouldn't believe some of the stuff that they try.:rolleyes: I've had the same kind of thing. Eventually it gets amusing.... only you are not at that stage yet.... so are still worried, which is understandable.

Do you think Egg have not got the Credit Agreements anymore? It's possible. It seems odd that they won't supply them for these two smaller debts but managed for the bigger one. This may not be a CCA either.... they often try and send Application Forms to people instead. And if Egg can't supply it does that mean they have to write the debt off? It becomes legally unenforceable, yes.... which is not the same as being written off.... but amounts to the same thing.

Sorry so many questions - but never been in this situation before and don't want to be intimidated into paying anything i don't have to by Fredricksons!

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...