Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

mebuck v Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

OK - A letter came today which prompted me to call the Halifax in order to find out why they are not including 8% in their settlement figure.

 

Before I explain their latest response, I thought I'd recap exactly what's been said during our correspondance so that a) I'm not running the risk of misquoting and b) I get the best possible advice.

 

On the 6th September 2006 I filed my court claim online and received this response from Halifax:

 

letter1a.jpg

 

letter1b.jpg

letter1c.jpg

 

In the Halifax's response, they told me that my claim was £85.59 higher than it should be and quoted they'd give me:

 

£1235.50 in charges, £319.16 "in respect of approximate interest that Halifax has calculated was charged on your account as a result of charges" and £120.00 in court fees.

 

Hang on, where is the 8%?

 

I thought that what they'd done was calculated that they owe me more interest (319.16 when I only calculated approximately 188 with the spread sheet) and so then conveniently forgot to include the 8% on top of everything. This consequently brought the requested figure from £1760.25 to £1674.66.

 

I considered this could be a money saving tactic. IE. Offering me more fundamentally, but taking with the other hand - leaving them better off.

 

My response to this letter was:

 

 

letter2a.jpg

letter2b.jpg

letter2c.jpg

 

Here, I basically took the new figure which I believed was their Interest Debited Estimate on charges... and added 8%.. along with 8% on the penalties etc. Just like in the spreadsheet.

 

I expected to hear back from them saying they'd give me the extra 8%, bumping the claim up to £1914.22, but this was their response:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

letter3.jpg

I rang up customer relations straight away, and the woman on the phone said that the interest they calculated (£319.16) was NOT the interest debited from my account (even though I was led to believe it was from their previous letter) but it is the interest I am entitled to, it is a high rate, and I cannot claim any more interest on top of that figure.

 

 

It would appear that we are both running out of time with the courts and need to come to some kind of arrangement fast. They are only giving me a few days to respond before they inject the cash into my account!

 

What should I do? I would really like a few different responses so I can make my mind up.

 

Please please advise! And let me know if I'm totally misunderstood here.

 

Best Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got abit of a slap wrist from bankfodder as my calculations were sloppy and my court claim didn't include an account number!

 

If only they'd give you more room to write it.

 

Settled with Halifax! May have been a bit short due to a discrepancy with the estimated interest, but pretty good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This echoes what happened to my claim. If, as it seems, Halifax are paying out some form of compensatory interest, why can't they inform us how this amount is made up and avoid all the confusion?

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I can see what's happening here.

 

Looking at the scans above, it seems that The Halifax are paying interest at a rate of 8%, but appear to be compounding it annually. In other words it is neither being paid as a simple rate from the date of each charge nor as a compounded daily rate.

 

So what's happening is that all charges for any given year are totalled, 8% interest is calculated on that amount, the new total is added to the sum of the following year's charges...8% is calculated on that amount, and so on.

Halifax (current a/c)- £3705.00

04/09/06 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent - lost by P.O.

20/09/06 - Prelim letter sent (special delivery)

30/09/06 - Reply to Prelim; Received statements

04/10/06 - LBA sent (special delivery)

14/10/06 - Offer received - £962 (err..no)

17/10/06 - MCOL issued: £3705 + £777.11 interest

19/10/06 - Moneyclaim acknowledged w/intent to defend

28/10/06 - SETTLED IN FULL!!

To be continued: Capital One(charges); Citi/Associates(charges); GMAC(ERC); GEMoney(charges); TMG(charges)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that's what they are doing, why can't they explain it in their letter, rather than trying to confuse people over the amount?

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...