Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our shoplifting forum for advice on this. I've also edited the title a bit, please let me know if I've misunderstood what you meant. Best, HB
    • I received a letter this morning from advantis acting on behalf of HMRC for a tax credit overpayment.. I am going to call them on Monday to set up a payment plan but am worried sick it’s going to show up on my credit file.. does anyone know if it will show now that hmrc are using them? 
    • I'm going to check the measurement units today as I feel this could well be happening otherwise I can't understand how the bill can be so high even when nobody there living sometimes. 
    • Totally stupid mistake struggling with money with 2 young kids no excuses so I won't bother justifying  just feeling deep regret and absolute fear for what happens next. Sincere moments of madness opportunistic and absolutely stupid Caught shoplifting from sainburies by and shop lifting plain clothed detective (penut butter almond milk chia seeds and nuts ) I only took 3 to 4 items from sainbries listed above  First time I did it In saisburies i have never done it before   Was given a letter banning me took details but no photo taken  I also had on me food items from mns that the store detianed at the same time as they wouldn't let me leave without showing a receipt as they said I would have stole those too (they werent wrong) . I have been to mns a few times in the last month and done a similar thing always general food shop  So I left the sainbries store when he let me go and left all the goods there mns.and sainsburies and did not return.  M&s and sainsbries are on the same high street   Questions  Was not caught by m&s will sainsburies share my info and will m&s be in touch? Presume they can check cctv of the time sainsburies detained me and probably find it  No police called when at sainburies  Scared that mns will also ban me after the event  or worse check cctv and have my details and pass to police to investigate  I am mortified at what I've done the detective did not mention anything about further letters / police or anything more other than taking my details and giving me a banning letter  My fear is they have told MNS and now MNS will investigate aswell they may have their own footage etc...and go further than sainsburies did at that time  Mns goods was fruit veg chicken cheese basically all food items  Advise please what could I be facing 😭
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank account and credit card - all in one?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi could anyone give me some advice. Have been reading all the threads and FAQs and really can't find an answer to this!! I want to claim for my bank charges and CC charges simultaniously and was wondering whether I could send one letter with bank and CC numbers on (and one cheque for £10) or if i should send 2 separate letters (with two cheques)...

 

Seems I will be sending them both to Trinty Road (Sarah Briggs...) so feels abit crazy to send 2 but if that ness then so be it!

 

Thanks lots - this site is fantastic and think I might have about a grand to claim so shall def donate :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I'm aware you should treat the accounts as unconnected and issue two letters. Halifax will likely be as awkward as possible so if you don't they'll probably use the dodgy argument of 'different companies.'

 

Also, you should set up a parachute account if you haven't already done so. On my CC default letter they say "If the terms and conditions of your account allow, we may also transfer money from any other accounts you have with us to reduce the debt outstanding." Like with the charges, this may not be legal, but that won't stop them and it would be rather inconvenient!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry halidebt you are wrong! as long as both accounts are with the same bank you only need one SAR - (Subject Access Request) letter with both account numbers on and one £10 fee! hope this clears things up?:)

 

I agree, then when you go further towards court, because you have one letter from Halifax you can use it to claim in one action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hey all, seems like i have been away a long time.

Have been following other stories with interest but has all been quite straightforward with my accounts til now...

 

Was initially offered poxy payment of about £100 which accepted as part payment. Filed against them with Moneyclaim claiming:

 

£604 charges (both accounts together)

 

£222.66 interest

 

£75.51 in 8% interest

 

 

Have now been sent a letter from Halifax without admission of liability offering £494 in charges and £222.64 in interest, with a paragraph stating

 

"The Halifax does not consider that you are entitled to the further £195.51" that you are claiming. Unless you can provide evidence of this further loss the Halifax will file a defence in respect to this part of the claim"

 

Is this normal??

 

Have only used the spreadsheets from here and am fairly (very!) sure my figures are correct. Am wondering whether I should accept this but am inclined to think that should continue????

 

ANY ADVICE PLEASE!!

Has this happened to anybody else?

 

Thanks all for reading - any opinions gratefully received :eek::eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, wstill wondering if anyone has any advice on the above query?

 

:confused::confused::confused:

 

Has this happened to anybody where they offer part of what you are claiming after the court stage?? :|

 

Sorry to harass :oops: but am a little confused/concerned! :-o

 

Thanks Soph

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send halifax a copy of your spreadsheet? If you did i would ask them to send you a copy of the charges that they have worked out and look to see how they differ from yours. Stress to them that you will not be withdrawing your claim till you have received the full amount or have received proof that the revised amount is correct.

 

Hope this helps you out, good luck

alexthekid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you just clarify things for me...

 

£604 charges (both accounts together)

 

£222.66 interest - is this overdraft interest that was caused solely by those charges? This seems to be very high in relation to the level of charges.

£75.51 in 8% interest

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...