Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Direct Debit


nofool
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Viewers

 

If like myself you are becoming verry concerned with the financial arm twisting edited tactics being used to make you sign Direct Debit agreements. by the large monopolistic corporations the likes of sky & BT to name but a few. currently BT are charging customers an extra £18.00 per yer for so called processing fees Its an outrage the admin costs are part of the overheads of running a business not something you add on to the bill afterwards its like charging to accept your money. where will this lead if something is not done an extra fee at the supermarket checkout for instance

the bill should include everything no adding fees on.

anyway before I get off track we have a petition going to try & get this sort off coersion banned click on the link.

 

Petition to: To make it illegal for companies to impose an administration charge if not wishing to pay Via Direct Debit.

 

thank you nofool

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin charge £60 per annum and are not backing down so easily, I'm going to have to sue to get mine back. Will keep you posted. I'll enjoy invoicing them for my time :)

 

I agree though the reason given simply does not matter and the danger once this becomes accepted these charges will grow and grow. This is exaclty what happened with banks charges and the success of the charges reclaim movement has been in some way due to thier greed. If the charges had been lower the banks wouldn't have looked so stupid.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Careful there Generic, if you disagree with the "consumers" Bookworm will try to shut you down, as apparently she's rather we live in a semi-communist state.

 

Is that right Bookie? you would rather the rich share thier profits with you? or the lazy people who do not manage their money in a suitable way??

 

As someone who disagrees in everyway to what this forum and "group" stands for my posts must at least give you something to do with your day tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wah wah wah, why don't you just pay by Direct Debit, they are trying to make it the more attractive choice for a reason, they want you to pay them on time and without hassle. How about you do it?

 

Realy so whats attractive about being pressured into giving these companys free access to your bank account. some of us like to control our own money thank you, just one more step towards state control where you as an individual have no say at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question

Why is the moderator posting his oppinions shouldnt he/she be neutral

in any case comsumer power is precisely what is being undermined with this diredt debit arm twisting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nofool, mate you seem to have pretty sturdy head on your shoulders. however, a direct debit is not "free access" to your bank account. knowing a little bit about these things as I actually have a job..bookworm....I would like to tell you what they can do with a Direct Debit.

 

They can-

 

- Take the monthly payment amount using the bank detials you have provided.

 

- change the amount as is required but you will find that they must inform you at a minimum of 14 days before the DD is due to be taken, therefore....

 

They cannot-

 

- change the amount they take from your account without informing you in advance

 

- pass the bank details on to 3rd parties

 

- refuse to give you the money back should you claim it through Direct Debit indemnity.

 

Under the direct debit guarentee (which I bet most of you will never have read) it does confirm all the above more or less. should you wish to seek more information on direct debit indemnity I would recommend you speak to your local bank, who are not in anyway associated with Satan although some would like you to believe otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lokiy2j

 

Im well aware of the terms & conditions of DD however you will find that once they have your money rightly or wrongly it can be a lenthy process getting them to put it back. this I know from exsperience.

also while your promoting DD you should point out that if there are insufficient funds in your account on that specific date that the DD is taken it is bank policy to alow the DD to go through then charge penalty fees for unauthorized overdraft etc. which can be a problem if your relying on your wages being paid direct to your bank as should they be late through no fault of your own you are hit with bank charged.

so once again DD is not your friend nor is the Bank.

we could Argue the pro,s & cons all day But the purpose of my post is DD should be a free choice & not forced upon anyone. Especially by corporate Monopolys like BT & Sky

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Direct debit really means licence to steal. Thats what they do these banks and companies, they STEAL from us. How can they be stopped? Laws don't apply to them! We little people have to join forces! How about a great Direct Debit revolt? Get as many people as we can to cancel them and pay manually??

 

Would that hurt them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct debit really means licence to steal. Thats what they do these banks and companies, they STEAL from us. How can they be stopped? Laws don't apply to them! We little people have to join forces! How about a great Direct Debit revolt? Get as many people as we can to cancel them and pay manually??

 

Would that hurt them?

 

If only they would unfortunately this country has been conditioned with properganda not to rock the boat.

where as the french they don,t stand for this crap at all as their goverment will testify to.

you will also note when the french go on strike or protest. as is their right.

they are not assaulted & molested by the police. unlike this country

I think that the goverment should outlaw all these extra charges

but then they are doing it themselves hell they even charge vat on fuel duty if that dosent take the pee what does.?:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Direct Debit is terrible. Nobody should use it for anything, ever.

 

The Direct Debit mandate is a play on words - yes they give the amount back - for about 5 days - then take the money again.

 

The only real power UK citizens have is withholding TAX payments.

 

Council Tax is mostly paid by Direct Debit - we could teach them a lesson by getting the whole country or a whole town to simply cancel their Direct Debits and not pay - the system would collapse in a few weeks - the council has to pay cash up front for court dates and their are only a limited number ...

 

PAYE is the other obstruction to citizens power - the government has removed our only real power - the power to refuse to pay them.

 

We are controlled by a very fragile system that can be destroyed in a few weeks.

 

Step 1 - pick a town and everybody stops paying for parking - council and court system get blocked up - citizens start to realise their power

 

Step 2 - stop paying council tax in that town - set up a fighting fund to protect the few who are targetted

 

Step 3 - now you have positive feedback - more citizens will get involved - people need feedback for their actions or they get bored - politicians know this - that is why everything is SLOW - target more and more towns

 

Step 4 - the prize - eradicate PAYE - this gives citizens real power - everybody simply stops paying tax for a month to send a message

 

A revolution without anybody leaving their armchair - nobody gets hurt

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...