Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lyverbyrd v Nationwide


lyverbyrd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I sent Mr Bacon a short e-mail saying that after looking at my chedule of charges I am sure my figures are correct!

 

Unless they make up the difference I shall be persuing with my claim.

 

When I contacted the member services dept. 2 hours later, it had been added! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are satisfied we have paid your claim in its entirety, taking into account any charges which may have been refunded to your account.

 

They have never refunded any charges. Not once. I have my statements as proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would email Mr. Bacon to remind him that your calculations are correct and inform of the fact that no charges have ever been refunded to your account.

 

Nationwide did that to me too, but I didn't bother to persue it as it was only £20.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I would check to see if any mods are online and send them a pm. They might know your next step. Sorry I can't help any further.

 

 

Ok just checked for you.....a few mods online, zooman, jonni2bad, blueskies and a couple of others.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that they did that for you. However, it's not the case here. They've paid up part of the claim two weeks after I got my notice that they intended to defend. They then wrote to me stating that they disagreed with my figures, even though I've sent them my schedule of charges, and that they have paid what they worked out to be the correct figure, taking into account any refunds I may have had. Well, I haven't had any, and my figures were taken from my statement.

 

I can't find anything in the FAQ that tells me what I should do next, I'm still £150 short on my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they haven't. I sent this letter:

 

I refer to your letter dated 27 September 2006.

Thank you for the part payments refunded to my account so far, but as this figure is considerably different to mine, I will not be advising the court that this matter is settled until I am satisfied that I have got back all the unlawful charges. I will also be expecting the return of any further charges and interest that may have been taken from my account since the start of this claim, plus the daily interest rate. I would also draw your attention to a further charge of £20 plus £3.78 interest that I was charged before I made my claim which wasn’t added in to this, purely because you have stopped my ability to access my account details, so I was unaware the charge had been taken.

I look forward to receiving the full amount still outstanding plus any amounts mentioned above, by 11 October 2006, otherwise I will have no choice but to continue with the claim and file for judgement.

 

Please could you send me a full breakdown of the charges that you have refunded, so that I may check these with my own figures. I attach again the schedule of charges which I have taken from my statements.

 

I also emailed it to them, without the schedule, and Sarah Watson only responded to the email (she sent a letter which referred to it). I've since emailed Charles Bacon again, attaching the above letter and the schedule of charges and I've heard nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok are the 28 days up yet? If so I would pm a mod, they may be able to advise you further. It would be interesting to know how nationwide are coming to their figures though and why such a difference between yours and mine.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

See Bevs thread - same thing is happening to her and to a number of others.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...