Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lyverbyrd v Nationwide


lyverbyrd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I sent Mr Bacon a short e-mail saying that after looking at my chedule of charges I am sure my figures are correct!

 

Unless they make up the difference I shall be persuing with my claim.

 

When I contacted the member services dept. 2 hours later, it had been added! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are satisfied we have paid your claim in its entirety, taking into account any charges which may have been refunded to your account.

 

They have never refunded any charges. Not once. I have my statements as proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would email Mr. Bacon to remind him that your calculations are correct and inform of the fact that no charges have ever been refunded to your account.

 

Nationwide did that to me too, but I didn't bother to persue it as it was only £20.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I would check to see if any mods are online and send them a pm. They might know your next step. Sorry I can't help any further.

 

 

Ok just checked for you.....a few mods online, zooman, jonni2bad, blueskies and a couple of others.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that they did that for you. However, it's not the case here. They've paid up part of the claim two weeks after I got my notice that they intended to defend. They then wrote to me stating that they disagreed with my figures, even though I've sent them my schedule of charges, and that they have paid what they worked out to be the correct figure, taking into account any refunds I may have had. Well, I haven't had any, and my figures were taken from my statement.

 

I can't find anything in the FAQ that tells me what I should do next, I'm still £150 short on my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they haven't. I sent this letter:

 

I refer to your letter dated 27 September 2006.

Thank you for the part payments refunded to my account so far, but as this figure is considerably different to mine, I will not be advising the court that this matter is settled until I am satisfied that I have got back all the unlawful charges. I will also be expecting the return of any further charges and interest that may have been taken from my account since the start of this claim, plus the daily interest rate. I would also draw your attention to a further charge of £20 plus £3.78 interest that I was charged before I made my claim which wasn’t added in to this, purely because you have stopped my ability to access my account details, so I was unaware the charge had been taken.

I look forward to receiving the full amount still outstanding plus any amounts mentioned above, by 11 October 2006, otherwise I will have no choice but to continue with the claim and file for judgement.

 

Please could you send me a full breakdown of the charges that you have refunded, so that I may check these with my own figures. I attach again the schedule of charges which I have taken from my statements.

 

I also emailed it to them, without the schedule, and Sarah Watson only responded to the email (she sent a letter which referred to it). I've since emailed Charles Bacon again, attaching the above letter and the schedule of charges and I've heard nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok are the 28 days up yet? If so I would pm a mod, they may be able to advise you further. It would be interesting to know how nationwide are coming to their figures though and why such a difference between yours and mine.

:p :p :pCARMEN :p :p :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

See Bevs thread - same thing is happening to her and to a number of others.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...