Jump to content

Judge claims its case is 'misconceived in law'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

My claim against Abbey was thrown out as the judge said it was 'misconceived in law'. I asked for a reinstatement of the claim and went to a hearing last Friday.


The Judge said the N1 claim form I had entered on line was the reason. I used the standard wording from Martins Lewis site and was very suprised as my 2nd bigger claim had gone through with the same wording. the Judge reinstated the case anyway, (and stayed it) but I now have to enter a "properly pleaded claim form" by this Friday.


Can anyone help/suggest the wording I should use if she does not like the Martin Lewis text?

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...