Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citi / DL&C / Hillesden


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I sent a CCA request to DL&C on 2nd August after they sent me a letter asking for payment for an old Citi / Associates card that I believe was paid off ages ago. A few weeks ago I received a "we'll get back to you within 21 days" letter from Hillesden Securities and yesterday I received another letter from them stating that they are following up on my request with CitiFinancial, that my account is on hold and that any action by them has been suspended.

In the meantime, I got hold of a copy of my credit files from both Experian and Equifax and there are defaults registered by Hillesden, dated March 2005.

As they have failed to comply with my request for a copy of my credit agreement, I would like to send them a letter asking that they stop pursuing me to repay the debt and that they remove the default from my credit record. I have pinched a letter from another thread an believe that it was created by Rory32 so I hope it is OK to use and thank Rory32 as I often find his posts relevant and useful.

Is there any possibility that anybody could just check the letter over for me before i send it, especially regarding dates. Also, is TS and the OFT that I should report them to for failure to comply?

Thanks

 

Thank you for your letter dated 21st September 2007.

 

I would however refer you to my letter sent you on 2nd August 2007, delivered 4th August 2007, VIA RECORDED DELIVERY in which I requested a true copy of the credit agreement.

 

To date you have failed to supply the requested document. The document I requested should be readily available as proof of your legal right to collect this.

 

In my letter of the 2nd August 2007 I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition a full statement of my account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of the credit agreement to be carried out before you entered into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, you commit a summary criminal offence. These time limits expired on 22nd August 2007 and 21st September 2007 respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware, Section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) -

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore on 21st September 2007 this account became unenforceable at law.

 

You have FAILED to comply with a request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement, and other relevant documents mentioned in it and FAILED to provide any of the documentation requested. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful HARASSMENT.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore, you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following would apply:

  • You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.
  • You may not add any further interest or charges to the account.
  • You may not pass the account to any third party.
  • You may not register any information in respect of the account with any of the credit reference agencies.
  • You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

I shall of course report your actions and those of your client to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

I trust this clarifies the matter for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLC have managed to send me an application form from 2000, a list of t&cs from 2006 (?) and a pile of mixed up statements and think that they have complied. I am considering my next move:p.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I hadn't seen the default on my credit record I might just have left them to it, especially as they have suspended any action. As I said before, I'm sure that it was paid off, but don't really want to S.A.R Citi unless DL&C / Hillesden start pushing for repayments. Will send the letter and see what happens. 6 months ago I would have just assumed that I owed them still (just because they said so) and probably started to pay them something without question so I am grateful to have found this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillesden go on and on sending the 'within 21 days' letters.

siobhan1234, we would also still be paying them without question in a DMP with Payplan. Their behaviour stung me into action - and I sent the CCA from here. We came out of the DMP specifically to challenge them. I'm struggling to believe what I've discovered since then.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sosumi

Totally agree. I have just been looking at the thread started by Intheknow and am astounded that these DCAs get away with what they do. I am all for repaying what I owe and have been fortunate not to have had too many problems but I have got 2 CCJs that I think I would have managed to stop if only I had found this site earlier. Hindsight is a wonderful thing eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hindsight is a wonderful thing eh?

Indeed.

 

Are there charges on the CCJ's that you could clim back to reduce the amount owing?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rory32

The CCJs are courtsey of the ever popular Mr Bryan Carter and Frederickson International. I fully intend to S.A.R him once he responds to my CCA request. I sent it a few weeks ago recorded delivery but no signature so will send another this week.

If Hillesden end up producing a copy of the original agreement then I shall go for charges on that too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillesden end up producing a copy of the original agreement

 

Apparently CITI are taking on extra staff to find the agreements..Well thats what Hillesden are saying..

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL - How hard is it??

 

They are filed by date, agreement number or surname.

 

Maybe they should a) get a filing system or b) get staff that know how a filing system works or c) don't destroy the agreements to save space in the offices after they sell them on incomplete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I haven't actually sent my leeter off to Hillesden yet as I was wondering whether I should S.A.R them instead, given that I believe the debt was paid off some time ago. However, I'm sure most advice is to S.A.R the OC but I have a feeling that I paid it off after it was passed (either assigned or sold) to another DCA in which case would they not be the best people to send the S.A.R request to. Maybe I should start with the OC and see where that takes me. If I do that, does the account remain in dispute because, even if Hillesden provide the original agreement, that doesn't necessarily mean that there is still an outstanding debt, just that one existed and was enforceable. Or should I just send the letter in post #1 to Hillesden and let things take theire course. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA them. They are SUPPOSED to provide a statement of account as part of the CCA request. If they fail to, raise a complaint with the ICO (nice and easy to do online - I've done 2 now) and maybe contact Northants Trading Standards too.

 

However, if you have overpaid they might not produce a statement and simply say it's written off hoping you'll leave it....if that happens I would SAR them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...