Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Actionfraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
    • It'll be something to the effect of:  "I am in receipt of your letter before claim.  I was awaiting a passenger as a licensed cab driver on the Locton estate who subsequently cancelled the pickup after me waiting a while and will fight this in the small claims court if necessary. Plus I have friends who are experts in contractual law and make it their business to defeat these spurious PPC claims.  So issue the claim form or go forth and multiply, up to you"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Woolwich Loan Pots, service


hissedoff
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone had issues with The Woolwich, Now Barclays since they tried to merge products and service centres etc 2 months ago, in particular Barclays saying they were removing the loan pot facility from open plan accounts, on the grounds of a business decision, now doing a U turn following complaints?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes i have had similiar experience with Barclays (Woolwich)

Barclays have now changed the 'goalposts' regarding my mortgage reserve account ! Previously if i was within my credit limit i could issue a cheque however now they say i must have a minimum of £2,000 available before i can use this facility ? I have asked them to explain this change and under what condition they are allowed to change the 'goalposts' . Still waiting for a response! Also seems many offices of Woolwich now closed however i get letters from Leeds/Bexleyheath/Leicester etc - very confusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

count me in. i only found out something was amiss when i checked my balance at an autobank. barclays cancelled all my woolwich loans pots, my monthly repayments and transferred the balance to my current account. i contacted their call centre, and although they don't know about the problem (allegedly) they were polite, efficient and able to log my complaint. i am expecting a response from theiir customer services within 5 days. i also intend to raise the matter with the banking ombudsman. barclays has rendered my current account incomprehensible by their arbitrary actions. i haven't a clue what all this will mean since they have not bothered to tell me. after years of excellent banking with the woolwich, barclays have reminded me of the unacceptable face of capitalism.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To correct any understandings, Barclays are not doing a U-Turn on Loan Pots. They are all in the process of being closed.

 

I can appreciate that this had caused some confusion, which I think has been caused by the poor way in which Barclays have handled the situation. Firstly they told us they were being closed, they they wrote to us to say they are considering their options then they write to us against to say they are being closed.

 

Anyway....

 

Are people actually aware of how a loan pot actually works. Forgive me if i am teaching anyone to suck eggs, but I think that a little more detail will resolve peoples concerns..

 

When you applied for your mortgage, you may have also applied for a reserve facility. This would have increase automatically as you repaid your mortgage.

 

Customers were offered the chance to have loan pots, Basically this allowed us to borrow a fixed amount over a fixed term. Now this is the bit people may not understand.

 

The amount of the loan pot was deducted from your reserve facility. For example if you had a reserve of £10k and applied for a reserve of £5K you would be left with a reserve of £5k

 

Now that the loan pots are being closed the outstanding balance of any and all loan pots are being transferred back to our currents accounts from where the money originally came from.

 

I can imagine that this has caused a great deal of worry and confusion. However, I think that we all have to remember that the amount we have borrowed has not actually changed. More importantly as the interest rate applied to both our loan pot and current account is the same, we are in fact paying the same in interest.

 

If your salary is paid into your current account, this could actually work in your favour, as the interest is calculated daily and could result in major savings. As for the negative balance of our accounts, the payments we previously made to our loan pots can instead be made to our current accounts.

 

So in summary, nothing has really changed. We still owe the same amount of money. We are still being charged the same rate of interest and if our salary is paid into the account we could actually save money.

 

I don't feel that the removal of the loan pot is really the end of the world. I would like to thank the Branch Customer Care Team at the Woolwich for the above explaination and for dealing with my complaint in a professional manor. Before they were involved, Barclays pretty much ignored my complaint. i received three holding letters from them, which just annoyed me.

 

Bring back the Woolwich PLEASE !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...