Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What happened in Preston County Court today!!


Loan Ranger
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Best of luck Loan Ranger.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuzzy wuzzy my horoscope for today says ' Would you like a fool proof 100% guaranteed way to win any argument? OK Here we go. Follow these instructions to theletter and no one will ever get the better of you again. Don't engage. There that's it. All you need to know. To enter into an argument is to lose far more than you can ever gain. If you are truly confident of your ground, you don't need to get excited about defending it. It's quite sufficient to explain. Make your point clearly and firmly, then leave the conversation alone.'

Feeling confident.

Thanks for leaving a message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ho

Atended court this morning and was met with a Barrister representing Llyods TSB :( ! He introduced himself and said that he was attending only to propose a Stay or to achieve an Urgenment. He went on to state that he would not participate beyond this, if the Judge saw fit to apose both of these.

Once in the Court Room the Judge basically said that in light of the OFT proceedings he felt that he was in no position to hear this case as he felt it was being nationally dealt with already. He also went on to say that he would not of usually have agreed to this mornings hearing but in light of TSB's poor actions regarding the return of documents in accordance to the Court requirements that he felt it was only fair to give us a chance to speak. However it was clear from the off that his decision to implement a Stay had already been decided. Not on behalf of the bank but on the behalf of the court as he felt that Court time was being wasted as this matter was already being dealt with at a higher level by the OFT. I tried to object to this using the 'Objection Of Application For Order Of Stay'. The judge glanced at this and said he had seen this document several times before and asked to see 'section 9' (The OFT's Particulars of Claim) that this document stated was attached.......oops, never heard of having to have this section to reference? This we hadn't foreseen as we had rung the court the day before and was assured that a Stay was not in place. He then proceeded to basically say that he was putting into affect the Stay until the OFT's test case has been finalised. However he went onto state that if this was ruled in our favour we would be able to charge interest and also perhaps recoup any finanical loses that we had incurred through attending today.

On a sad note for us all are hard work was to no availl as the court had misplaced our bundle and the Judge hadn't even :mad: seen it!

The Judge warned us that if we were to pursue this further that it could be to our financial detrement as the next court hearing would take a full day and we would need to employ a legal professional for the next stage. So for the amount we wish to reclaim it simply isn't worth it if we lose or if we recieve a second Stay.

On a high note TSB has had to pay for the services of a Barrister today but ironically this probably cost them more than it would have cost them to settle in full with us!! BULLY BOY BANKS:confused: :rolleyes::mad:

The Barrister on leaving the court said he was sympathetic to our plit as ' the bank nicks money from me also!':)

Time to return to reality and retreat from the virtual!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loan Ranger,

 

I know how you're feeling - what you said happened today, was pretty much word for word what happened to me yesterday - and yes, they lost my bundle too!

 

It seems that there are now two very different sets of rules....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not advise you to cancel your claim. As the judge has applied the stay I would just wait and see the outcome of the OFT's action. You will still be gaining interest. The chances of you losing and having to pay costs are very very slim to say the least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your stay Lone ranger. At least the old fart at Preston had decided my case against Barclays was being stayed prior to me turning up.:smile:

 

I agree with the previous post however that theres surely no way they can get away with giving us nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Judge warned us that if we were to pursue this further that it could be to our financial detriment as the next court hearing would take a full day and we would need to employ a legal professional for the next stage. So for the amount we wish to reclaim it simply isn't worth it if we lose or if we recieve a second Stay.

 

Regarding that above, are you referring to the judge saying pursuing it will be to your financial detriment, was (s)he talking about i) applying to lift the stay ii) or generally continuing with your charges claim and waiting for the test case outcome.

 

I presume the former, i.e. i).

 

Unfortunately you will just have to wait, all is not lost, just as the judge said, the interest will be accruing.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...