Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

gargoil V Bank Of Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6149 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Court Forms ready for next claim, lost count now is this 4 or 5? ;)

 

Not going to post them until I've the money in the bank for the above claim!!

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They've still not paid up 1 day after end of LBA, I've phoned them twice since the weekend and they haven't phoned me back when they said they would so i have just contacted an Edinburgh Sheriff's Officer to serve a charge for me. Costs £31.37 for Small Claims Decree which will be added on to the money owed to me (minus VAT) and gives them 14 days to pay up or the officers storm the mound..................hehe

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck gargoil, although i'm sure you don't need it.x

PLEASE HELP OTHERS, WHEN YOU WIN YOUR CLAIM GIVE A LITTLE BACK

 

 

Nationwide **WON**- £3,880.00 14/03/07

 

Nationwide Claim 2 LBA sent 13/03/07

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was just reading over my summons again there and I had asked for best part £120 for expenses and damages over the top of the charges and interest, which was also awarded to me!!! Sweeet!!! :D

 

Holding off on next action until I have this one finished!!!

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have my decree now, phoned customer reltions who seemed a bit peeved that I had their direct number, they are phoning me back before 2pm with an update. Just posted the letter below to them along with a copy of the decree. This give sthem till Monday to pay up. have name of Sheriffs Officers I can use if I don't have a cheque by then!!!

 

 

Could you possibly give me the telephone number of customer relations as I am chasing the money that BOS are due me as I have also been granted a decree against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just use the phone numbers in the sticky thread at the top of the HBOS section! :)

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gargoil, did you get a letter from BOS after your prelim letter saying that they had 8 weeks to investigate your complaint?

BOS- S.A.R sent 2/2/07

 

Barclaycard- S.A.R sent 9/2/07

 

Ikea- S.A.R sent 9/2/07

 

Capitol one- S.A.R sent 9/2/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rooney I can't actually remember if the letter said 8 weeks. I think it just said they were looking into it!

 

"They" have now agreed to pay out. Received a letter saying my account would be refunded even though the account has been closed for ages now. Phoned them up and told them this and they are sending a cheque out to me. Also informed them they are now liable for sheriffs officers fees so they are adding that on to the cheque. Ow happy days!!! :D

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Havin a wee bit of a problem with this one, have posted a thread for help in the general section....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80090-can-i-instruct-sheriffs.html

 

I have sent them this letter today and have also emailed it to them.....

 

5th April 2007

Dear Sir/Madam,

gargoil –v- Bank of Scotland

Account "account1"

 

Subsequent to my previous communication, your letter dated 22nd March and my subsequent telephone calls to your staff. I note that you have still failed to make payment of the amount owed under the above action despite being served with a charge for payment of money by Stirling Park sheriff’s officers on 27th March 2007. It is also over a month since I supplied you with the decree for payment from Kilmarnock Sheriff Court.

I note that you have paid an amount into my account "account2", which is overdrawn by £1100. Payment into this account is not an acceptable solution. There has been over £1500 of charges applied to this account over the past 6 years. From the start of this complaint I have made it clear that I require the amount owed to be sent to me by cheque.

As a gesture of goodwill I will give you until Monday 16th April to provide me with this amount by cheque. If you fail to make settlement of the sums due, you will leave me no alternative but to instruct Stirling Park sheriff’s officers for an attachment of the Bank’s assets at any premises occupied by your organisation.

You are already required to pay me a further £26.70 for sheriff’s officer’s fees. If I am required instruct an attachment of assets you will also be liable for a further £130.95.

Best Regards

gargoil

 

Also finally posted summary cause summons out for £1498 today for the Account2 mentioned in the above letter. Also asking for default removal in particulars of claim which is first time I have attempted this.

 

Hope it gets accepted ok! Hope you guys are still understaning all of this as my head is pickled!!

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

On Thursday Bank Of Stupid's legal department told me that I would have to take this matter up with customer relations . I sent the above letter to them by post and email got this email in reply this morning. Think the're getting annoyed. So I think that pretty much means I've no option but to send the sheriffs officers in to the mound!!

 

As previously advised to you by myself and several of my colleagues in Customer Relations Department, this matter has been in the hands of our Legal Department for some time now. I've passed your e-mail to them to deal with as they see fit and I'd respectfully ask you to stop contacting our department by phone and e-mail and in future deal only with our Legal Department

 

Jim Kerr

Review Manager

Customer Relations CB/2/CR/JK

DDI 01422 326513 - ext. 26513

[email protected]

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Summary Cause Papers on way to bank,

 

Return Date:- 25/5/7

 

Hearing Date:-1/6/7

 

Total Claim £1891.55+ Court Fee+ Sheriffs Officers Fee

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok the bank are now summoned by the sheriffs officers as of 1st May, they have a fortnight from today to answer it!!

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , Im looking for some advice, I sent my first letter to BOS on 1st March, After the 40 days i sent them a reminder. Two weeks later i tried to telephone the branch but as everyone who has tried that it is almost immposible.I wrote to customer services in Dunfermline .I recieved a letter on 26th April from Mr Graham Sumbler

@ BOS Data Subject Access Request Team. His letter states that they provide information as quickly as possible..

He also stated on the letter that the information requested was enclosed..Guess what? no info in letter..

Also going after First direct who have been great got offer in post to day. so might accept it,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monty - re First Direct - they offered me £75 short of my full claim on my first letter - I wrote back and said no, I wanted it all and when I rang them two weeks later they paid up in full, straight away - I ahd the cheque by the end of the following week. They seem pretty easy to deal with, so, it depends on how keen you are to get your hands on the dosh - but if you want to wait just a litle bit longer you could get the whole lot back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so today is the return date. I phoned Customer "lack of" relations yesterday for an update and the girl said someone would call me back. Am just home from work today and there is a messag eon my answer machine from their legal dept. asking me to call them to confirm account details. I think I will wait till Tuesday to call them as I seem to remember someone else having a similar request just before there return date and they subsequently defended it. I'm a wee bit worried about thi sone as its th efirst time I've been out of the small claims path. Just need to wait and see I guess.

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gargoil

 

This seems to be dragging on and on for you. What a shame!!!! They may be phoning to discuss your case. This is what they did with me and I got all my charges back.

 

Good luck

Annie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the words of support Annie. I phoned the court this morning and they are closed for bank hols so will be straight onto them tomorrow morning.

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does sometimes seem that there are *downs* as well as *ups*.

 

Remember . . . Hang on in there.

 

How many Banks have actually appeared in courts either North or South of Hadrian's Wall?

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well phone dthe court and they have said they intend to appear! Bollox! So goin to have to prepare I guess and I am now ****ting it as I am in the summary cause track. I know theres a chance they won't appear but.....

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

:o Ouch! :o

 

But . . . well . . . that might be a first IF they do appear!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got the direct number for the person who is dealing with it in their legal dept. so will call them this afternoon and see whats happening!

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well phoned the legal dept and the court for more info. The court confirmed to me that they have received no defence but only a notification that they intend to appear. The banks legal dept hav esaid they are only defending a portion of it on the basis that it is now time barred. They have paid the undefended portion into my account. I am hoping they don't show on friday as the woman on the phone seemed adamant about having me settle at this. The figures she quote dme regarding amount I'm claiming before and after the 5 year limit do not match.

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just back from court from my Summary Cause hearing, Bank Of Scotland had a solicitor present who advised the court that they had now paid out the last 5 years charges and were defending the charges over 5 years on the grounds of the limitation act. I informed the sheriff that the bank had made a payment of £936.16 yesterday this however was over £600 short of the total charges for the past 5 years. The solicitor then said that a previous payment of £589 had been paid in March. I then informed the court that I believe the BOS were confused and that this payment was a settlement for a previous action on a seperate account. He made me repeat that it was a seperate account. I said that I still reuired a payment of £616 to cover the charges plus interest of the past 5 years. I said I was willing to contest the defence at a hearing on grounds on s32(1)(b) of limitation Act 1980. He advised me that this wouldn't apply in thi scase and it was some act 1973 that would apply( Didin't pick up what he said!)

 

The sheriff set a hearing date for 6th July but advised me to liase with BOS to get it settled. I would be happy to settle for the charges plus interest and court fee for the past 5 years. The sheriff told the solicitor to advise the BOS that the previous payment of £589 was for another account and I have subsequebtly phoned the bank to confirm. I will also put it in writing to them.

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter drafted and posted:-

 

Dear XXXX,

Further to our court hearing and our telephone conversation today. Thank you for your payment of £936.94 towards the above referenced court action for bank charges.

Your solicitor informed me that there had also been a previous payment of approximately £589 into this account and that together with the payment of £936.94 covered the charges from this claim for the past 5 years. Please note the payment of £589 was a refund of charges from accounts Account2 and Account3, which was paid out in March as a result of a previous court action, ref XXXX. It was paid into account Account1 on my request to cover an unauthorised overdraft. I have provided a copy of the summons from the previous action to substantiate this.

I therefore calculate that a payment of £616.95 is required to cover the remaining balance of the charges from the past 5 years for this account/claim. I have included a revised spreadsheet of charges from the past 5 years from the date of court action for your reference.

I understand you intend to defend the charges older than 5 years on the basis of the limitation Act 1980. I believe that the 5 year limit does not apply in this case due to s.32 (1) of the act which states, “….where in the case of any action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this act….- (b) Any fact relevant to the plaintiff’s right of action has been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant. The period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it….”

As the OFT investigation into charges was not published until 5th April 2006 I do not believe that the limit on my claim is 5 years. However if I receive payment of the outstanding balance of the charges from the past 5 years plus interest requested (detailed on spreadsheet) plus my court fee of £39 then I would be willing to drop my perusal of the charges older than 5 years. I calculate the total owed to be £655.95. If you are willing to pay this amount to me to settle this issue then I will inform the court on receipt of the funds that the case has been resolved to my satisfaction. I would prefer this amount to be sent by cheque rather than refunded into the account as it is now closed.

Best Regards

gargoil

BOS

Claim No.3 for £589.75+8%, Decree received, Sheriffs Officers instructed to serve a charge 21/4!

Claim No.4:- claiming £1507.00, Court Papers submitted 5/4 !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...