Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deceased Mother's Debt And Phillips & Cohen Associates


Kasei
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6041 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did you place a s.27 notice (creditors notice) in your local newspaper and the London Gazette? (one must be in the London Gazette and the other in the place where they lived).

 

The OP is in Scotland. Confirmation would apply not probate. If there is no estate or their is a small estate confirmation may not be reqired.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's more or less the same procedure, for instance you would still put an add in the local paper and one of the National ones (I think it's one of the Edinburgh ones rather than Glasgow) if the value of the estate is high enough.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be using the letter as my case is almost identiacal, but its only 12 months, and its with Littlewoods.

 

So all this information has been very useful as it is such a hard thing to deal with, it nice to know you get everything right.

 

And im in England.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

This reminds me of a story I heard earlier this week, a friend who is a gravedigger in a big London cemetery told me that they frequently had people round from DCA's looking to see if people really were dead - he told me they sometimes liked to point to a freshly dug grave and tell the person they will be next.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

This reminds me of a story I heard earlier this week, a friend who is a gravedigger in a big London cemetery told me that they frequently had people round from DCA's looking to see if people really were dead - he told me they sometimes liked to point to a freshly dug grave and tell the person they will be next.....

 

Sounds almost as bad as a story I was told about antiques dealers who went in the night to fresh graves to dig up jewellery treasures people were buried with - that made me go cold at the very thought of it. Sickening what some will do...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well folks finally got a result, I sent the letter I posted above with the corrections suggested off to PCA on the 28th of september.

 

I returned home on friday from a business trip to Ireland to find the following replay lying on the doormat, dated the 2nd of October.

 

"Further to your letter in relation to correspondence issued to you regarding the late {Mother's Name}. I would like to convey my sincere apologies for any distress our letter may have caused you and your family and for any inconvenience which may have arisen as a result.

 

I am pleased to be able to advise you that we have now amended our records and closed the account in question; I can further confirm that you will receive no further correspondence from Phillips & Cohen Associates in relation to this matter.

 

I am sure this is a difficult time for the family, so we thank you for your patience and understanding.

 

Your sincerely

 

Richard Fenton

GM UK Operations"

 

Just like to say a big thanks to everyone who give me help with this, the letter came as a huge relief to my father, and we can now consider this put firmly to bed, and move on.

 

RESULT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

quote

http://www.csa-uk.com/csa/upload/Con...e%20 2007.pdf

 

Take a look at 14:00 in the conference agenda.

 

 

 

 

wish i'd had know about this conference, i would have gladly paid the entrance fee as a non-member, attended the "workshop sessions" and voice recorded all their tactics. I would have been particulary interested in Day 2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great, im so pleased you got that result.

 

1 less thing for you to worry about, and im so pleased your dad wont be getting any more letters from them.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a look at 14:00 in the conference agenda.

 

The very man - he must have the apology letter ready to send if he upsets anyone. HOW can these people sleep at night? Have they never suffered a bereavement?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps now people might just understand why the CSA are self regulatory and why regulating the DCA's or purporting to be regulatory they do what they damned well like: It's like a gathering of the mafiosa:

 

Day 2

 

Motivating staff to maximise collection returns and

profitability of your business.

 

14.00 Ken Maynard, Chief Executive, Cabot Financial.

until recently, chief executive - CSA !

 

15.30 A new type of client is emerging - Debt purchasing

DCAs are becoming clients themselves.

 

"In outsourcing their collections what do they want to see

in their DCAs? Workshop and Discussion Forum.

Andrew Bartle - Chief Operations Officer, The Lowell Group.

Neville Megaw - Head of Operational Support, The Lowell Group. - read about them on this forum....

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Day 2

 

Motivating staff to maximise collection returns and

profitability of your business.

 

A Cynic may retitle this. New excuses and half truths to use on the telephone to gain more money out of people who do not know their rights thus ensuring you earn your monthly bonus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

......and if you do it well, we'll give your free holidays and even a car as a reward .....training? What training?........:mad: !

 

As we have noticed when anyone from a DCA posts on here English is obviously not a prerequisite for a job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time of my mothers death last year she owed £380 solely in her name to a catalogue firm, the catalogue account was protected by payment insurance, at the time of my mother's death I contacted the catalogue firm and informed them of the situation, they asked for a copy of the death certificate which i duly sent to them, they then refused to cover the repayments due to the cause of death, stating that they may change the decision based on the report of the family doctor, we contacted our GP who got in contact with them, and we heard nothing further regarding the matter until a letter arrived this morning addressed to the estate of my late mother from a debt collection firm, a full 14 months after her death.

 

The letter stated that the £380 was still outstanding and that they required information on whether an estate exists, I called the number and explained to them that my mother didn't leave an estate, the only thing she left was a funeral plan which at the time wasn't even sufficient cover the funeral costs, however this didn't deter the person on the phone who seemed hell bent on getting me to settle the debt in full, or agree to a payment plan, after much arguing I did finally get the person to admitt that the debt was solely in my mother's name and as such her spouse and children are not responsible for it, eventually they gave in trying to get me to pay for and said that they would have to conduct an investigation into whether I was telling the truth or not, and they would be in touch when they had the outcome of this investigation, they closed the call with asking me to think about the payment plan which I replied I didn't need to think about it as I wasn't willing to repay the debt, as it's not mine.

 

Just wondered where I stand with this am I in the right here, since there's no estate does this debt die with my mother?

 

What is likely to happen next?

Can they take me to court and attempt to force me to pay?

If they continue to send me letters regarding this and bombard me with phone calls, is there any action I can take to make the harassment stop?

Kasei, sorry I missed this - but very pleased to hear of a positive outcome.

A letter of apology never seems enough though, does it? Aggression first and always, assume the 'debtor' is 'lying', 'beat them down' tactics... Always the default approach from Debt Collection Agencies. Toads.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how long it'll be before PCA try shipping it out to another DCA in order to recoup some of the cash they paid for it?

 

As the last letter from them does say :

"I can further confirm that you will receive no further correspondence from Phillips & Cohen Associates in relation to this matter."

 

In my mind that statement lacks clarity, as to whether the matter is closed once and for all, and doesn't rule out the possiblity that whilst they've promised to leave it alone, I won't hear about it again from someone else, chances are(knowing my luck like I do), another DCA will get hold of this and start the cycle of harassment all over again, think I've won this particular battle, but I'm reluctant to state with any great degree of certainty that I've won the war.

 

At least if someone else does buy this debt off PCA I can send them a copy of PCA's letter and tell them to go ask them for the money.

 

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a certainty that some bottom feeder will pick it up in the future. It will probably be sold along with a bundle of other debts. That unfortunately is the way these people work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...