Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

BenKing v Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A quick summary of things so far:

 

2nd June: Rung customer services to see what fee I should include with my data request. After checking with her supervisor I was told no fee was necessary. Sent data request letter.

 

7th June: Reply saying could not continue without the £10 fee. I opted to plough through the statements and found £1212 worth of charges so replied informing him of the contradiction. I enclosed the next letter.

 

15th June: Standard Letter offering £130 goodwill gesture. They kindly attached a breakdown "free of charge" of my charges which totalled £1906.

 

Here's the good bit.

 

I entered those charges onto the spreadsheet to calculate the interest and found that they don't add up to £1906, but £1966.

 

I've checked them 3 times and get the same figure every time.........:eek:

 

The LBA goes off today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Halifax explanation:-

 

"This document is computer generated so I was concerned to see that your addition did not match that of the computer. However, when I checked through the charges, I noticed that on the 1/4/03 there was a charge printed twice. The screen would have only held certain capacity and I know from experience that at the end of the page the last charge is duplicated to the next page."

 

Good will offer has been increased to £390, which I am not accepting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, most banks will try and offer paltry goodwill gesture.

 

Stick in there!

HBOS Plc - £9,954.65 Received partial settlement - Court 6/12/06 default removal / compensation / declaration

MBNA - Settled in full £2,377.33

Abbey National - MoneyClaim filed 26/06/2006 £883.90

Lloyds TSB - Claim Filed 11/08/2006 £2,630.00

Egg.com - Claim Filed 11/08/2006 £1,393.60

GE Money - Claim Filed 11/08/2006 £965.22

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

As the deadline for starting court action approached I decided to fire one last letter to the Halifax asking them to once again provide me with the details of costs incurred by themselves when imposing the charges. The letter before had stated that they had wanted to resolve my concerns amicably, so I thought I'd put them to the test.

 

I offered to accept the amount of my claim less these costs as I am a reasonable man.

 

Their response received today clearly shows that they are prepared to tell lies to their customers:

 

"As a gesture of goodwill we offered to refund six months worth of charges to your account, which you refused to accept"

 

Their first offer was £130.

 

The second was £390.

 

Charges incurred in the last 6 months = £78

 

Obviously, Chris Hale, the Redress Assessor is either a) incapable of adding £39 to £39 or b) a liar.

 

Hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go.....................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Having been reading through other recent Halifax claims and having received the same standard letters looks like this week could be a good week.

 

I've also got a chance to have another go via the ombudsman:

 

I wrote to them on 29th July on another matter of complaint, rang the next day to confirm they had the letter - which they did, and I was informed it was being scanned and a reply would be made within 8 weeks.

 

Despite my protests that they should deal with this sooner they informed me under their code of conduct they were allowed 8 weeks to reply to letters.

 

Needless to say 8 weeks passed and no reply came. I wrote to them before submitting the court papers reminding them they had missed their deadline and unless a reply was forthcoming in 7 days would report this to the ombudsman.

 

No reply, just the standard letter saying they would not refund charges.

 

Looking forward to their next letter (hopefully Tues or Wed) offering to refund all charges + court fees + interest.

 

Once that is received, I'm contacting the ombudsman about the non-reply to the letter of the 29th July:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Standard letter received today of acknowledgement offering to pay my claim as it's too costly to defend, blah, blah,

 

but with an added paragraph!

 

"The Bank of Scotland does not consider that you are entitled to the further £350 that you are claiming. Unless you can provide evidence of this further loss the Bank of Scotland will file a defence in respect of this part of your claim".

 

My claim was based on the list of charges they finally sent to me after my initial letter in June 2006 asking for a list of charges on my account for the last six years.

 

I notice 4 of the charges in fact were from early 2000 and therefore pre-date the 6 year period. However, having spoken to the woman at the Halifax today (as the letter I received today didn't have their revised list with it) I am told that he has only counted charges from the date of my court claim and not from 1/8/00 and 1/9/00.

 

These two missing charges total £75 would make the total amount £2144.68 + 120 court fees instead of the £2036.24 + court fees they are prepared to put into my account.

 

Just to complicate things further, their calculations of the interest are higher than mine were!

 

They've promised to ring back later to discuss the two missing charges, so I'll keep you posted........................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a thought..........

 

In their letter they say:

 

"However, on a purely commercial basis it will cost Halifax money to defend your claim in terms of the legal costs that will be incurred.........For this reason, but without admission of liability, Halifax is willing to reimburse etc etc"

 

then they go on to say about the 4 charges included before the 6 year period:

 

"Unless you can provide evidence of this further loss BOS will file a defence in respect of this part of your claim"

 

So, they are not prepared to defend the bulk (because they know they cannot) but are happy to defend a small part (because they know they can)

 

Hopefully, that could give an extra bit of confidence to anyone contemplating court action :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't rung back, turns out he tried calling me on an incorrectly noted down number. They agree the £75 should be paid.

 

Yesterday I faxed my acceptance to the number they gave me, but the fax was never answered.

 

This is like pulling teeth........................

Link to post
Share on other sites

hope you get somewhere soon, at least you know you will get your money, good luck and enjoy spending it, hope you have a brill xmas now

Halifax

 

data request handed into branch: 25/09/06

 

statements received: 08/11/06

 

Total Charges to date: £569.00

 

 

1st letter handed into branch 20/11/06 requesting £607.75

 

LBA handed into branch 04/12/06, have till 18th dec to respond....

9th December... SETTLED IN FULL!! YAY!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still losing teeth.................

 

Despite numerous requests for this guy to call me, this has still not happened. So I telephoned again this afternoon to discover that a letter is being sent to me today (which I will probably therefore not receive until Saturday) saying that I need to sign an acceptance form before they can do any more.

 

The letter sent on 13th mentioned no acceptance form but merely stated: "Please confirm within 7 days that you are willing to settle" I was also told yesterday this could be done in writing by faxing a letter to them, which was done even though the fax number they gave me was not answered (my local branch sent it to another).

 

Needless to say I am getting more and more frustrated by these delaying tactics and have given them until 4pm to credit my account with the money owed.

 

They said in their letter of 13th Nov they have returned the Acknowledgment to the Court - not according to the court who I telephoned this morning.

 

Deadline expires at 4pm today, so it looks like I'm off to court first thing in the morning unless someone pulls their finger out.............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, really pleased for you! good to see another postive outcome

Halifax

 

data request handed into branch: 25/09/06

 

statements received: 08/11/06

 

Total Charges to date: £569.00

 

 

1st letter handed into branch 20/11/06 requesting £607.75

 

LBA handed into branch 04/12/06, have till 18th dec to respond....

9th December... SETTLED IN FULL!! YAY!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have done this. I had a letter drafted but asked for the info over the phone. They sent a letter asayiing duplicate statements would cost £5? I don't think this is what we are asking for though? Its a list of charges - not statements and correct me if I am wrong but every statement costs £5 from the Halifax? Should I send in the correct letter with the £10 and the Data Protection quotes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done! I hate this company with a passion now. The second man I spoke to on the phone was rather rude to me tonight. Pipex have taken my DD out early , AGAIN. So, this has obviously incurred a £39.00 charge which I have refused to pay but they say I must. Have spoken to stupid Pipex and they say I've to call back tomorrow when Finance are there during 9 - 5.30 hours but he advised me they will take 14 days to refund my money. Argh! I am now so angry that I'm gonna claim back what I am due for the last 6 years and that will teach them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Luticea

 

You are going to need to send the SAR letter from the drafts section of this site along with a cheque for £10. The SAR letter asks them to send a schedule of the charges OR copies of statements..... I was sent copies of statements as they say that they are unable to provide a schedule of charges only, and £10 is enough to cover this no matter how many years worth of information you are asking for. Hope this helps!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...