Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'summary judgement'.
Found 1 result
I have a summary Judgement Hearing to strike me out next week following a claim from Shoosmiths in respect of an debt to IDEM SERVICING and would welcome any advice. Should I try to strike the claim out? Can you tell me a if The documents below are all included by Shoosmiths in their trial bundle. (A) If the Claim is valid as it does not include an account number ?.. (B) is the agreement valid I am particularly interested in the rubber stamp signature that seems to have been randomly added at a later date.. . and does it have what it needs to make it a legal ? C) The reference number on the agreement does not tally with the account number they claim they have bought. The Default notice does not tally with the account number they have bought. How does this affect the case? D) They have provided no notice of assignment. I applied to idem for any documentation they had on me .. . The terms and conditions they supplied were not the same as those provided by shoosmiths. Idem only contacted me a couple of months ago .. before I was talking to Arden.. Is there a rule about masquerading? Thanks for any help you can offer. Will keep in touch and let the forum know the outcome