Jump to content

Showing results for tags 'short application form'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The Consumer Forums: The Mall
    • Welcome to the Consumer Forums
    • FAQs
    • Forum Rules - Please read before posting
    • Consumer Forums website - Post Your Questions & Suggestions about this site
    • Helpful Organisations
    • The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
  • CAG Community centre
    • CAG Community Centre Subforums:-
  • Consumer TV/Radio Listings
    • Consumer TV and Radio Listings
  • CAG Library - Please register
    • CAG library Subforums
  • Banks, Loans & Credit
    • Bank and Finance Subforums:
    • Other Institutions
  • Retail and Non-retail Goods and Services
    • Non-Retail subforums
    • Retail Subforums
  • Work, Social and Community
    • Work, Social and Community Subforums:
  • Debt problems - including homes/ mortgages, PayDay Loans
    • Debt subforums:
    • PayDay loan and other Short Term Loans subforum:
  • Motoring
    • Motoring subforums
  • Legal Forums
    • Legal Issues subforums

Categories

  • Records

Categories

  • News from the National Consumer Service
  • News from the Web

Blogs

  • A Say in the Life of .....
  • Debt Diaries

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location

Found 1 result

  1. All, My request to a refund of PPI payments and interest going back to June 1999 has been rejected by Capital One. They have provided a copy of my postal application, a "Short Application Form", which has my name and address printed. The application has a section where it states: "Please enrol me in Capital One's Payment Protection scheme" with a Yes or No box. The Yes box has been ticked while the No box is completely blanked out; like it has been entirely filled in by marker. I suspect the application form has been amended after I submitted it. In addition, the ink and style of the tick in the Yes box appears to be different from the rest of the application (possibly a thiner pen). In their response to me they have not acknowledged that the No box had marker over it. They state: "The application form gives two opetions regarding the addition of the PPI policy. The boxes are clearly marked 'yes' or 'no'. Therefore, you had the choice to tick either box and the PPI was only added because you selected 'yes'. If you had ticked the box marked no or left this blank, the PPI would not have been applied to you account. We have never pre-populated or automatically completed tick boxes on our application forms and continue not to do so." They have also said that they send me a copy of the PPI policy after it was taken out. I do not recall this happening. I have uploaded an image of part of the application here: i47 . tinypic .com /wm0ze1.jpg (Sorry, less than 10 posts so I can't post the link or picture directly. Please delete the 4 spaces in the above link) Is it me or does something not look quite right with this? I do not recognise the signiture on the left, presumably it is the Capital One underwriter. I did note that it was a finer pen than I had used though, similar to the Yes tick. I intend to write back and point out the unusual No box. Any thoughts or advice would be gratefully recieved. Thanks Chris
×
×
  • Create New...