Showing results for tags 's43k'.
Found 1 result
-
Hi Everyone, I was an agency worker and I was sacked for making a protected disclosure. I have taken the company and my agency to the Tribunal The company has sent in their ET3 In it, they are claiming that they are not the one that "substantially" determines the terms in which I worked I have looked at the Law: section 43k of the employment rights act 1996 In particular 43k (1)(a)(ii) and sees that it should be could be either one of them or both of them. But also I have looked at Day v Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Health Education England UKEAT/0250/15/RN Where the Judge ruled that it must be one Meanwhile, in McTigue v University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0354/15/JOJ The Judge ruled that it could be both (see para 38 (i)) I think the difference in outcome is due to the word "substantial" So guys; what is the meaning of "substantial" in this context? Also, what does "terms" mean in 43k (1)(a)(ii). Thanks
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS