Showing results for tags 'mixed'.
-
I purchased a Diamond Engagement Ring from Vashi.com online and paid the full amount of £2,464.05 on 10th July 2015. I proposed to my partner with the diamond ring on a holiday to Barcelona. I went to great expense to get everything right,*which was very important to me. We stayed at a 5 Star hotel in Barcelona, I hired a table on a secluded veranda overlooking Barcelona, hired a Mariachi band who were playing a serenade where I proposed with the ring I had purchased from Vashi.com. Everything went and seemed perfect. On our return from Barcelona we asked Vashi.com to alter the size of the ring as it was too big and to upgrade to a different stting design, which we chose in person at the company’s London shop and paid a further £301. I received the amended ring at my home by registered post on 12th August 2015 and signed for it. The Engagement ring was given away to my fiancée as a gift at the blessing ceremony on the next day 13th August 2015. Vashi.com telephoned me on 18th August (7 days after I received the ring) checking if I have received the ring because their system showed that the ring is still in the depo and during their stock check they suspected an error. Upon my confirmation of receipt of the ring Vashi.com expressed the suspicion that I may have received an incorrect item and asked me to send our Engagement ring back. To cut a long story short we refuted their claims believing we had our ring we paid for. They then accused us of retaining a ring that did not belong to us saying that another customer wanted their ring back, giving us an ultimatum to return the ring or pay an additional £1000. Also the so called diamond certificate is not a certificate (has no number on the diamond) and is indeed their own appraisal. They have harassed my fiancee and I since and now have issued a claim in court against us! Any advice? surely this must be a breach of our consumer rights. We are in court on the 16th March 2016.
- 18 replies
-
- county court
- engagement
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hullo, I have just received a letter from a DCA (EOS Solutions) and needless to say, I'm a little irritated... When I moved in this flat, I was paying for an unmetered supply. However, a few months later, it emerged that the flat was actually on a water meter, & all my payments subsequently transferred. No problems there. However, a few weeks back, I received a tetchy letter from Southern to "The Occupier", asking for details regarding the current occupants in relation to an unmetered account. Rang them, and they said "Oh, just an automated mail run. Please disregard". Today, I received a letter from EOS Solutions enquiring as to the occupancy at my current address. Obviously I have no intention of getting in touch with them (I have no relationship with them - as far as I see it, this is an issue for Southern Water to resolve). Also, they don't have my name or any other details. But I thought it best to be safe rather than sorry and check with the experts on here... Would I be right in thinking my best way forward is to ignore the DCA letter entirely, and speak to Southern Water and point out they need to get their bloody affairs in order. Is there any chances of this being linked to my credit rating or anything like that? Any other advice? Thanks in advance all! EDIT: Just saw the DCA link. Letter seems mostly in order as they identify their customer as Southern Water. But they did address the letter to "The Occupier"...
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.